News Update

US Nurse convicted of killing 17 patients - 700 yrs of jail-term awardedGST - Payment of pre-deposit through Form GST DRC-03 instead of the prescribed Form APL-01 - Petitioner attributes it to technical glitches - Respondent is the proper authority to decide the question of fact: HC2nd Session of India-Nigeria Joint Trade Committee held in AbujaGST - Since SCN is bereft of any details and suffers from infirmities that go to the root of the cause, SCN is quashed and set aside: HC1717 candidates to contest elections in phase 4 of Lok Sabha ElectionsGST - Once Appellate Authority comes to the conclusion that SCN was issued by an officer who was not competent; reply was also considered by an incompetent authority and the Competent Authority had not applied its independent mind, Appellate Authority could not have assumed original jurisdiction and proceeded further with the matter: HC7th India-Indonesia Joint Defence Cooperation Committee meeting held in New DelhiGST - Neither the Show Cause Notice nor the order spell out the reasons for retrospective cancellation of registration, therefore, the same cannot be sustained: HCMining sector registers record production in FY 2023-24GST - If the proper officer was of the view that the reply is unclear and unsatisfactory, he could have sought further details by providing such opportunity - Having failed to do so, order cannot be sustained - Matter remanded: HCAnother quake of 6.0 magnitude rocks Philippines; No damage reported so farI-T - Initial burden of proof rested on assessee to substantiate his claim of having incurred expenditure on improvement of property: ITATTrade ban: Israel hits back against Turkey with counter-measuresI-T - Agricultural income can be treated by ITO as undisclosed income in absence of any substantial / corroborative material to prove same: ITATCanada arrests three persons in alleged killing of Sikh separatistI-T - Income from sale of property has to be classified & characterised only in manner of computation as per section 45(2): ITATCus - When there is nothing on record to show that appellant had connived with other three persons to import AA batteries under the guise of declaring goods as Calcium Carbonate, penalty imposed on appellant are set aside: HCCongress fields Rahul Gandhi from Rae Bareli and Kishori Lal Sharma from AmethiGST -Since both the SCNs and orders pertain to same tax period raising identical demand by two different officers of same jurisdiction, proceedings on SCNs are clubbed and shall be re-adjudicated by one proper officer: HCFormer Jharkhand HC Chief Justice, Justice Sanjaya Kumar Mishra appointed as President of GST TribunalSale of building constructed on leasehold land - GST implicationI-T - Interest received u/s 28 of Land Acquisition Act 1894 awarded by Court is capital receipt being integral part of enhanced compensation and is exempt u/s 10(37): ITATGirl students advised by Pak college to keep away from political events
 
I-T - When depreciation amount eligible for deduction u/s 80IA is more than income, assessee is not entitled to deduct same on gross receipt: HC

By TIOL News Service

NEW DELHI, DEC 29, 2017: THE issue is - Whether when the depreciation amount eligible for deduction u/s 80-IA is higher than the assessee's income, assessee is still entitled to deduct the same on gross receipt. NO is the answer.

Facts of the case

The Assessee-company, engaged in the business of consultancy and professional services for sale and installation of wind electricity generators. The Assessee had filed its return for the relevant AY. During the assessment proceeding, the ITO noted that the Assessee had entered into an agrrement with their principal company and manufacturer, namely, M/s Vestas Danish Wind Technology, A/s, Denmark. The power generated from the wind generators was sold to Tamil Nadu State Electricity Board and the Assessee had earned money out of the same. Further, the ITO noted that the Assessee had net profit from consultancy and was entitled to depreciation on the wind mills erected and commissioned. Accordingly, the said depreciation was reduced from income earned from generation of power and as the resultant figure was in negative therefore, the Assessee was not entitled to any deduction u/s 80-IA.

On Assessee's appeal, the CIT(A) held that the wind mills was used for more than one activity and, therefore, it does not follow that depreciation would be allowed only against income of one activity and not other. On further appeal, the Tribuhnal accepted the Revenue's contentions and held that the AO was justified in treating depreciation on wind turbines as a deduction from the income of power generation and therefore, there was no income from the eligible business on which deduction u/s 80-IA was to be allowed. Therefore, the Revenue's appeal was allowed and the order of the CIT(A) was reversed and restored the AO's order.

On appeal, the High Court held that,

++ the depreciation, which was to be allowed and given on the wind mills was almost fifteen times the income earned by the Assessee from generation of electricity, which was eligible for deduction u/s 80-IA. The Assessee would not be entitled to deduction on the gross receipt without reducing depreciation u/s 80-IA regardless of whatever interpretation they want to place on the provisions of Section 80IA. The view we have taken is in consonance and in conformity with the view expressed by this Court Dabur India Ltd., where it was held that deduction u/s 80-IA is on the net amount earned by the eligible undertaking, i.e., after computing the income of the eligible undertaking in terms of Chapter IV of the Act, which includes Section 32 relating to depreciation;

++ the question of bifurcation of depreciation in view of the two lines of business, etc. wanes, as the amount of depreciation, even on bifurcation, which would be reduced from the gross receipts of the undertaking eligible for deduction u/s 80IA, would be significantly higher. Therefore, we do not find any good ground or reason to interfere with the order passed by the Tribunal.

(See 2017-TIOL-2657-HC-DEL-IT)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.