News Update

US Nurse convicted of killing 17 patients - 700 yrs of jail-term awardedGST - Payment of pre-deposit through Form GST DRC-03 instead of the prescribed Form APL-01 - Petitioner attributes it to technical glitches - Respondent is the proper authority to decide the question of fact: HC2nd Session of India-Nigeria Joint Trade Committee held in AbujaGST - Since SCN is bereft of any details and suffers from infirmities that go to the root of the cause, SCN is quashed and set aside: HC1717 candidates to contest elections in phase 4 of Lok Sabha ElectionsGST - Once Appellate Authority comes to the conclusion that SCN was issued by an officer who was not competent; reply was also considered by an incompetent authority and the Competent Authority had not applied its independent mind, Appellate Authority could not have assumed original jurisdiction and proceeded further with the matter: HC7th India-Indonesia Joint Defence Cooperation Committee meeting held in New DelhiGST - Neither the Show Cause Notice nor the order spell out the reasons for retrospective cancellation of registration, therefore, the same cannot be sustained: HCMining sector registers record production in FY 2023-24GST - If the proper officer was of the view that the reply is unclear and unsatisfactory, he could have sought further details by providing such opportunity - Having failed to do so, order cannot be sustained - Matter remanded: HCAnother quake of 6.0 magnitude rocks Philippines; No damage reported so farI-T - Initial burden of proof rested on assessee to substantiate his claim of having incurred expenditure on improvement of property: ITATTrade ban: Israel hits back against Turkey with counter-measuresI-T - Agricultural income can be treated by ITO as undisclosed income in absence of any substantial / corroborative material to prove same: ITATCanada arrests three persons in alleged killing of Sikh separatistI-T - Income from sale of property has to be classified & characterised only in manner of computation as per section 45(2): ITATCus - When there is nothing on record to show that appellant had connived with other three persons to import AA batteries under the guise of declaring goods as Calcium Carbonate, penalty imposed on appellant are set aside: HCCongress fields Rahul Gandhi from Rae Bareli and Kishori Lal Sharma from AmethiGST -Since both the SCNs and orders pertain to same tax period raising identical demand by two different officers of same jurisdiction, proceedings on SCNs are clubbed and shall be re-adjudicated by one proper officer: HCFormer Jharkhand HC Chief Justice, Justice Sanjaya Kumar Mishra appointed as President of GST TribunalSale of building constructed on leasehold land - GST implicationI-T - Interest received u/s 28 of Land Acquisition Act 1894 awarded by Court is capital receipt being integral part of enhanced compensation and is exempt u/s 10(37): ITATGirl students advised by Pak college to keep away from political events
 
ST - When the aim of CBEC is to improve taxpayer services, transparency, accountability and efficiency in indirect tax administration, Board should recognize online refund claim through amendment in law: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, DEC 26, 2017: THESE are appeals filed by the assessee against the orders passed by the Commissioner(A) rejecting the refund claims filed on the ground of their being time barred.

Inasmuch as the online refund claim filed by the appellant(s) was not recognized by the department.

Incidentally, in the Trade Notice No. 14/ST/2009-ST dated 17/9/2009 issued by Commissioner of Service Tax, Delhi, it was stated that using the software application called Automation of Central Excise and Service Tax (ACES) the user will be able to take registration on-line electronically, file statutory the returns, claims, intimation and permission/ refunds and request for provisional assessment and view and track the status of their documents online.

The Bench, therefore, issued Notice to the CBEC to show cause the reason why the procedure of online filing of refund application prescribed by CBEC Circular no. 14/ST/2009 (Commr. of ST, Delhi T.N) dated 17.09.2009 shall not be recognized to be the defined mode in the eyes of law, in absence of statutory recognition there of, when the aim of the Circular of the Board is to improve the taxpayer services, transparency, accountability and efficiency in the indirect tax administration.

The CESTAT explained that the notice is issued for the reason that non-recognition of the online refund claim filed by the appellant had caused hardship to the claimant. And it is high time for the Board to issue appropriate guidelines to the field to recognize the online refund claim through amendment to law to prevent unwarranted hardship of the claimants.

The Tribunal wished that the Board file its reply by 31.12.2017 to resolve the disputes which were pending on this count.

While mentioning that the Tribunal had taken a consistent view that the claim made on-line is tenable, the Bench also directed the jurisdictional Chief Commissioner to pursue the matter with the Board for an early resolution to the litigation.

In passing: Please also see 2017-TIOL-1542-CESTAT-DEL wherein the CESTAT held that the date of filing the refund claim electronically is to be taken as the date of filing refund claim and with reference to that date, the claim is not barred by time.

Thankfully, the GST law provides all this, well almost!

(See 2017-TIOL-4525-CESTAT-MUM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.