News Update

Canara Bank and Dena Mark merger NOT on anvil: GovtPM calls for 'TB Mukth Bharat'; Govt to declare panchayat & blocks TB-freeFodder Scam - Laloo gets 14 years jail in 4th caseRoC registers more companies post-GST: MoSAadhaar is optional for drawing pension: MoS'Jan Suraksha' scheme: Govt launches new website for subscribersCBEC asks field formations to speed up recovery of Rs 11500 Crore arrearsGSTN takes several user-friendly stepsCbC Report - Mar 31 deadline not to apply to group entities u/s 286(4)Tariff war - China hits back at USA; imposes duty on goods worth USD 3 bnGST - January collections peak to Rs 89,000 CroreGovt amends e-waste management rules; New targets fixedOver 15 lakh e-insurance accounts opened till Mar 15, 2018E-Way Bill to come into force from April 1, Due dates prescribed for filing of GSTR-3B for April to June 2018Payment of CGST, IGST, UTGST under reverse charge exempted till 30.06.2018I-T - TDS certificate granting lower rate cannot abruptly be cancelled, based on Revenue's apprehensions that assessee may run into losses in future: HCMumbai Customs recovers 7 kg gold in three separate casesI-T - Failure of explicit communication of amended trust deed before Department, is no ground for withdrawal of its registration, till its charitable: ITATApex Court invokes contempt powers against advocate Nisha Priya Bhatia; Former AG Mukul Rohatgi appointed as amicus curiaeUGC grants Jindal Global Univ autonomous status, first private Univ in HaryanaSales tax - Kerosene returned back by RIL to BPCL after extracting N-Paraffin, will amount to 'fresh purchase' and not 'return stream', and hence taxable from prospective effect: HCAnti-dumping duty on 'Flat Base Steel Wheels' imported from China PR to continue till 25 March 2019Exemption from IGST and Compensation Cess under Advance Authorization Scheme and EPCG Scheme extended up to 01.10.2018FTP 2015-2020 - Advance Authorization - Self Ratification Scheme added in Handbook of ProceduresTaxing exports - An unintended missNational Advisory Council acts as 'Think Tank' on tourism: AlphonsCX - Allowing credit only to extent of tax paid by recipient assessee in respect of Manpower Supply service and denying credit of quantum of tax paid by service provider is not based on law: CESTATSmart India Hackathon 2018 - Grand Finale to be held simultaneously at 28 centers
Double GST on in-bond purchase: Is it intent of law?


DECEMBER 18, 2017

By Bipin K Verma

THIS article is in continuation of my earlier article hosted on this portal on the meaning and impact of Customs Circular 46/2017-Cus dated 24.11.2017 on the issue of levy of GST on sale of imported goods while lying in bonded warehouse. The need for writing about the same circular again arises from the fact that the circular has been updated on 6.12.2017.

In my earlier article, besides doubting the correctness of the view it was pointed out that various credit related issues may emerge on such transaction of in-bond sale/purchase of imported goods. Relevant part of my earlierarticle is extracted below for ready reference:

"Levy of GST separately on such in-bond sales, in line with the above circular would create following complications with regards to availing of credit which too require due attention:

- Who will avail the credit of IGST paid under Customs Tariff Act at the time of clearance from warehouse?

- How can such credit be utilized for payment of second GST on same goods?

- GST under IGST Act will become payable on in-bond sale even before IGST as customs duty is paid. No provision under GST allows refund of said credit even if the same is not utilizable.

It is desirable that CBEC should have addressed the above questions as well under the same circular to harmoniously settle the issue."

Now, surprisingly CBEC has responded or we may say acted on its own in this regard and this is a welcome gesture. The CBEC website now displays an updated version of the said circular. I am sure most of the readers would be unaware about the updated version as the same has been uploaded without any distinct announcement. The main body of the circular remains the same but the illustration part as annexure has been modified and expanded. It says "Illustrative charts A, B and C are attached to the circular to facilitate better understanding- Substituted on 06.12.2017."

Three charts A, B & C illustrate the GST incidence in three situations:

- Goods imported, bonded and sold while in the Bonded Warehouse and clearance thereof .

- Goods imported, bonded and cleared for home consumption and subsequent sale thereof

- Goods imported and cleared for home consumption and subsequent sale thereof

It shows that the gross GST incidence in all three situations would be the same. However, it ignores the fact that incidence of GST for the ultimate purchaser of imported goods would differ and would almost be double for such buyer in first situation (Chart A). In situations covered by Charts B and C the importer pays IGST on import, avails credit of the same and then pays GST on sale of said goods utilizing the credit of GST paid as Customs duty. Thus, the purchaser suffers the incidence once only. While in situation A, GST as part of customs duty may not be available for setting off GST liability arising on purchase of said goods. The updated version specifically illustrates that credit of both the GST paid, once as part of customs duty and second as GST on purchase, shall be available. However, if such purchaser is an ultimate consumer then the single transaction of purchase of goods bears the incidence of GST twice. Even if the said purchaser is a trader, input credit available to him would be more than his output GST liability. Thus, it would not be possible for him to utilize the credit of GST paid twice against the single transaction of sale of such goods unless he has some other business enabling utilization of accumulated credit of GST.

Thus, GST would become payable twice on the goods purchased by a person from an importer while such remain deposited in the bonded warehouse. I feel double incidence of GST on purchase of such imported goods cannot be justified in law and cannot be the intent of the Government too,especially when one of the proclaimed objectives of GST is avoidance of cascading effect. This point is, in itself,is sufficient to canvass the view that the law and its interpretation on the subject issue needs review for positive solution.

[The author is an Executive Partner, Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan, New Delhi and the views expressed in this article are strictly personal.]

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site)

Sub: Double GST on in-bond purchase

agreed fully

Posted by Navin Khandelwal
Sub: discussions

The more important question is whether the interpretation given by the customs on the valuation and clearance related provisions is correct? Certainly not. It is pathetic situation that even the top officials of the customs department do not know and understand the customs law and issue such arbitrary clarifications. It is to be noted that in the Kyoto convention to which India is a signatory, it was agreed that the goods in warehouse are as goods as kept beyond a customs territory. Hence the same from that place is to be considered as a high sea sale as the goods are sold before their clearance in domestic market.

Posted by subhash jain