News Update

Sales Tax - 'sale price' apart from including consideration for sale, also includes value of any discount or rebate offered, which is to be deducted from sale price: SCGST - GoM on IT to review progress made by GSTN so far on SaturdayRailways inducts two digitally enabled LocomotivesADB loans USD 84 mn for improving water supply in Bhagalpur & GayaIAS Association delegation meets Dr Jitendra SinghFodder scam - Laloo pleads for bail; Jharkhand HC says NOIES officers to get new houses soonIndia successfully testifires N-capable ballistic missile ‘Dhanush’ from Naval Ship off Orissa coastIndian, Canadian PMs resolve to expedite BIPA & CEPA pactsCBDT notifies India-Kenya DTAA (See '')GST on 'Commission' Received in Convertible Foreign Exchange – Part-I (See 'TOG Insight' in Bond Scheme to open on Mar 1 for 10 daysNDMA organises workshop on action plan to deal with heat waveRailways organises suppliers' Samvad; Digital Challan launchedChanges in the business connection provision (See 'Edit' in '')I-T - Department has no right to re-examine entire issue from a different angle, if returned income of assessee is accepted barring minor adjustment of expenditure claim: HCGST Council meeting - pointers from Industry for considerationCus - CBLR, 2013 - Prohibition - Even orders passed under Regulation 23 are appealable u/s 129A of CA, 1962: HCCertain grey areas in Taxability of 'Bill to - Ship to' TransactionsST - Refund - Banking services and technical inspection & certification services are co-related with export; are Input services: HCGovt notifies Electoral Bonds; Political parties can encash bonds only through bankBig relief for Indian students joining MBBS abroad; Govt grants them exemption from qualifying NEETFinance Commission invites inputs for widening of tax baseCanada to aid India in research effortsCivil Services Day - Four priority programmes listed for PM's AwardsI-T - When assessee diverted sum received for procuring import licences for purchase of shares, such advance is to be construed as deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e): HCI-T - If Revenue initiates penalty proceedings after six months of receipt of adjudicatory order, such proceeding is beyond period of limitation imposed u/s 275: HCGST Council to meet on March 10 through video conferencing; likely to approve new GSTR design and many amendment in GST lawsPNB fraud - ED & Income Tax continue to seize luxury vehicles & assets of Nirav Modi & ChoksiBank Frauds - Taxpayers tired to pay for 'New Civilisation'!I-T - It is clear case of barking up wrong tree if Revenue records show no tax arrears against assessee: HCIntermediary services to foreign parties-inter-state or intra-state supply?
When assessment by Addl CIT as AO in absence of valid order u/s 120(4)(b) is quashed on legal issue, Tribunal's comment on invocation of powers u/s 263 is not necessary: ITAT

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, DEC 07, 2017: THE issue before the Bench is - Whether when the assessment order passed by the Addl CIT as AO in the absence of a valid order u/s 120(4)(b) is found to be without jurisdiction, then there is any need for the Tribunal to comment on the invocation of powers u/s 263. And the ITAT verdict is NO.

Facts of the case

The Assessee, a holding company of the Tata Group, preferred an appeal challenging the order passed by the CIT u/s 263.

Having heard the parties, the Tribunal held that,

++ the Supreme Court in the case of Shelly Products & Another clearly held that taxes paid by the Assessee on the returned income cannot be refunded. We, therefore, following the principle of judicial discipline hold that in the facts of the present case, the Additional CIT in the absence of a valid order u/s 120(4)(b) has well as section 127(1) would not have exercised power of a AO to pass the said assessment order. Accordingly, the same was passed is without jurisdiction would have no show and, therefore, quash the same;

++ the CIT has invoked his jurisdiction u/s 263 in respect of the order passed u/s 154 with respect to the assessment completed u/s 143(3) on 15.03.2005. We have already quashed the order passed by the AO u/s 143(3) therefore, the order passed by the AO u/s 154 with reference to the assessment order passed u/s 143(3) has also become infructuous and in consequence thereof the order passed by the CIT by invoking jurisdiction u/s 263 has become invalid. We, accordingly, quash the order passed u/s 263.

(See 2017-TIOL-1682-ITAT-MUM)