News Update

Linking of Aadhaar with PAN - About 40% linkage done so farNew Reward Scheme calls for grant of reward not in routine mannerGST - Revision of TRAN-1 last chance to correct wrong claim for transitional credit: GovtCX - Since principal manufacturer did not pay duty and did not follow procedure and conditions of notification 214/86-CE, job worker as manufacturer is liable to duty on job worked goods: LB CESTATSC asks Centre to explore connecting live videos of court proceedings with Judicial Data GridDoPT trying hard to clear backlog of promotions: Dr Jitendra SinghNovember records 10 lakh foreign tourist arrivals with over 14% growthBoard clarifies that since CVD leviable u/s 9 of the CTA is not taken into consideration while fixing AIR of Duty drawback, the drawback of such duty can be claimed under an application for Brand Rate under Drawback RulesCRS Disclosure - OECD seeks inputs on Model Disclosure RulesIT Sector urges FM to lower GST on telecom services to 12%NIC CERT launched to predict cyber attacksConnectivity with ASEAN is India's priority: GovtTreading GST Path - XXXIX - Tribunal at crossroadsST - Denial of CENVAT credit on ground of failure to deposit tax by service provider is not correct in equity when there is no express condition to that effect in CCR, 2004: CESTATI-T - Reopening of concluded assessment by invoking provision of section 147 will not fall under ambit of change of opinion where AO formed an opinion contrary to binding decision of Apex Court: ITATCus - A court is expected to make an overall assessment of fact situation and test same on touchstone of law to reach to its conclusion: CESTATVice President calls for ranking of legislatures & notifying disruptors on daily basisOnline exam portal of IAF launchedPre-Budget Meet - Economists ask FM to lower MAT & spell out roadmap for tax reformsNadda launches Operational Guidelines for HDUs & ICUsRahul Gandhi formally elected unopposed Congress President; PM congratulates him on his elevationCBDT Task Force for reviewing Income Tax Law to hold its first meeting on Dec 14, 2017Real Estate- ITC a double edged sword under GSTST - Service of taking repossession of vehicle from borrower is a part of 'security' service which is specifically included in definition of input service: CESTAT
When assessment by Addl CIT as AO in absence of valid order u/s 120(4)(b) is quashed on legal issue, Tribunal's comment on invocation of powers u/s 263 is not necessary: ITAT

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, DEC 07, 2017: THE issue before the Bench is - Whether when the assessment order passed by the Addl CIT as AO in the absence of a valid order u/s 120(4)(b) is found to be without jurisdiction, then there is any need for the Tribunal to comment on the invocation of powers u/s 263. And the ITAT verdict is NO.

Facts of the case

The Assessee, a holding company of the Tata Group, preferred an appeal challenging the order passed by the CIT u/s 263.

Having heard the parties, the Tribunal held that,

++ the Supreme Court in the case of Shelly Products & Another clearly held that taxes paid by the Assessee on the returned income cannot be refunded. We, therefore, following the principle of judicial discipline hold that in the facts of the present case, the Additional CIT in the absence of a valid order u/s 120(4)(b) has well as section 127(1) would not have exercised power of a AO to pass the said assessment order. Accordingly, the same was passed is without jurisdiction would have no show and, therefore, quash the same;

++ the CIT has invoked his jurisdiction u/s 263 in respect of the order passed u/s 154 with respect to the assessment completed u/s 143(3) on 15.03.2005. We have already quashed the order passed by the AO u/s 143(3) therefore, the order passed by the AO u/s 154 with reference to the assessment order passed u/s 143(3) has also become infructuous and in consequence thereof the order passed by the CIT by invoking jurisdiction u/s 263 has become invalid. We, accordingly, quash the order passed u/s 263.

(See 2017-TIOL-1682-ITAT-MUM)