News Update

Linking of Aadhaar with PAN - About 40% linkage done so farNew Reward Scheme calls for grant of reward not in routine mannerGST - Revision of TRAN-1 last chance to correct wrong claim for transitional credit: GovtCX - Since principal manufacturer did not pay duty and did not follow procedure and conditions of notification 214/86-CE, job worker as manufacturer is liable to duty on job worked goods: LB CESTATSC asks Centre to explore connecting live videos of court proceedings with Judicial Data GridDoPT trying hard to clear backlog of promotions: Dr Jitendra SinghNovember records 10 lakh foreign tourist arrivals with over 14% growthBoard clarifies that since CVD leviable u/s 9 of the CTA is not taken into consideration while fixing AIR of Duty drawback, the drawback of such duty can be claimed under an application for Brand Rate under Drawback RulesCRS Disclosure - OECD seeks inputs on Model Disclosure RulesIT Sector urges FM to lower GST on telecom services to 12%NIC CERT launched to predict cyber attacksConnectivity with ASEAN is India's priority: GovtTreading GST Path - XXXIX - Tribunal at crossroadsST - Denial of CENVAT credit on ground of failure to deposit tax by service provider is not correct in equity when there is no express condition to that effect in CCR, 2004: CESTATI-T - Reopening of concluded assessment by invoking provision of section 147 will not fall under ambit of change of opinion where AO formed an opinion contrary to binding decision of Apex Court: ITATCus - A court is expected to make an overall assessment of fact situation and test same on touchstone of law to reach to its conclusion: CESTATVice President calls for ranking of legislatures & notifying disruptors on daily basisOnline exam portal of IAF launchedPre-Budget Meet - Economists ask FM to lower MAT & spell out roadmap for tax reformsNadda launches Operational Guidelines for HDUs & ICUsRahul Gandhi formally elected unopposed Congress President; PM congratulates him on his elevationCBDT Task Force for reviewing Income Tax Law to hold its first meeting on Dec 14, 2017Real Estate- ITC a double edged sword under GSTST - Service of taking repossession of vehicle from borrower is a part of 'security' service which is specifically included in definition of input service: CESTAT
CX - Dismissal of appeal on sole ground that adjudication of lis involving minor demand would not be productive is failure to exercise jurisdiction: HC

By TIOL News Service

CHENNAI, DEC 07, 2017: THE CESTAT, Chennai passed the following Final order dated 3/1/2017-

"Appeal pertains to duty demand of Rs.7,42,297/-. We do not consider it productive in this appeal to invest time by the Tribunal while there is huge pendency involving crores of rupees of Revenue. Therefore, appeal with a very minor demand of duty levied is dismissed."

The aforesaid order is assailed on the following substantial questions of law:-

a. Whether the second respondent is right in depriving the appellant the statutory right as provided under Section 35 (c) of the Central Excise Act, 1944?

b. Whether the second respondent is right in dismissing the appeal filed by the appellant by issuing an order mentioning that they do not consider it productive to invest time by the Tribunal while there is huge pendency involving crores of rupees and revenue and therefore, this appeal with minor demand of duty levied?

The appellant invited the attention of the Court to its decision in Roots Multiclean Ltd. =  2016-TIOL-324-HC-MAD-CX .

The High Court noted that on more than one occasion, the Supreme Court has held that reasons are the heartbeat of any decision and dismissal of the appeal without adverting to the facts, grounds of appeal is not appreciated [M/s.Steel Authority of India Ltd., v. STO, Rourkela-I Circle & Ors. =  2008-TIOL-133-SC-CT, Kranti Associates Private Limited and another vs Masood Ahamed Khan and Others) (2010) 9 SCC 496 relied upon].

The High Court further observed -

"9. Dismissal of the appeal, on the sole ground that there is a huge pendency involving crores of rupees of revenue and adjudication of lis involving a minor demand of duty of Rs.7,42,297/- would not be productive, in our opinion is a failure to exercise the jurisdiction conferred on CESTAT, Madras, both on facts and law. In terms of Section 35B of the Central Excise Act, the appellant is certainly an aggrieved person by the orders impugned before CESTAT, Madras."

The Civil Miscellaneous appeal was allowed by setting aside the Final order of the CESTAT. Substantial questions of law were answered in favour of the assessee.

Noting that the appeal was filed by the assessee in the year 2007, the Tribunal was directed to dispose of the same expeditiously within a period of two months.

(See 2017-TIOL-2523-HC-MAD-CX)