News Update

‘Flash Mob’ drive in London seeks support for PM ModiTo deliver political message, Pak Sessions judge abducted and then released: KPKMaersk to invest USD 600 mn in Nigerian seaport infraChile announces 3-day national mourning after three police officers killedIndian Coast Guard intercepts Pakistani boat with 86 kg drugs worth Rs 600 CroreGold watch of richest Titanic pax auctioned for USD 1.46 millionIraq is latest to criminalise same-sex marriage with max 15 yrs of jail-termUndersea quake of 6.5 magnitude strikes Java; No tsunami alert issuedZelensky says Russia shelling oil facilities to choke supply to Europe20 army men killed in blasts at army base in Cambodia3 Indian women from Gujarat died in mega SUV accident in USJNU switches to NET in place of entrance test for PhD admissionsGST - fake invoice - Patanjali served Rs 27 Cr demand noticeI-T - Bonafide claim of deduction by assessee which was accepted in first round of proceedings does not tantamount to furnishing of inaccurate particulars, simply because it was disallowed later: ITATIndia-bound oil tanker struck by Houthi’s missiles in Red SeaSCO Defence Ministers' Meeting endorses 'One Earth, One Family, One Future'RBI issues draft rules on digital lendingIndian Air Force ushers in Digital Transformation with DigiLocker IntegrationGoogle to inject USD 3 bn investment in data centre in IndianaST - When issue is of interpretation, appellant should not be fastened with demand for extended period, the demand confirmed for extended period is set aside: CESTAT
 
Cus - Maharashtra Police could not have invested huge public money for purchase of boat for pleasure without being used for patrolling purpose-Revenue's classification of Patrolling boats under CTH 8903 fails: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, NOV 27, 2017: AGAINST an order passed by the Commissioner of Customs (Import), the appellant is before the CESTAT.

They submit that the raw materials and parts were imported to manufacture two Patrolling Boats and to supply the same to Maharashtra Police.

The goods so imported were allowed to be warehoused for manufacture of war boat meant for use as patrolling boats by Maharashtra Police. To carry out such activity, central excise registration was not required in terms of Notification No. 36/2001-CE dated 26.6.2001.

Appellant submitted that warship falls under CTH 89.06 which reads -

89.06 Other vessels, including warships and lifeboats other than rowing boats.

8906.10 - Warships

8906.90 - Other

It is the Revenue contention that the boat cleared from the warehouse was high-speed motorboats essentially designed for pleasure or sports and classifiable under CTH 8903. Furthermore, the appellant did not file ex-bond bill of entry against the raw materials allowed to be warehoused for end-use in manufacture; that appellant had delivered the boats without following due process of law and committed breach thereof.

After considering the submissions, the Bench inter alia observed -

"8. Dispute on classification was raised by Revenue contending that the boat manufactured by appellant was of the nature dealt by CTH 8903. We do not understand why Maharashtra Police shall be investing huge public money for purchase of boat for pleasure without being used for the purpose of patrolling. When page 100 of the appeal folder is read, it is revealed that copy of a document appearing thereat was issued by Maharashtra Police explaining that the boat was fitted with arrangement to carry Arms and Ammunitions by Police patrolling parties in district Raigad & Sindhudurg for the purpose of coastal security. Revenue's plea fails accordingly to hold that such boats fall under CTH 8903.

9. There was breach of law for not informing the excise authorities as to the manufacture carried out in warehouse and also there was breach of law made by appellant without filing ex-bond of bill of entry. Maharashtra Police having clarified that the boats were meant for the purpose of security and patrolling, no penalty is imposable on the appellant in the fitness of the circumstances of the case since warship was exempt from duty."

The appeals were allowed.

(See 2017-TIOL-4152-CESTAT-MUM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.