News Update

Attack on Delhi Chief Secretary turning into street fights & legal battlesDAE Health Scheme notified for Sec 80D benefitsIssuance of Certificate of origin retroactively - period enhanced to twelve months from the date of shipment - Customs Tariff (Determination of Origin of Goods under the Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement between the Republic of India and Japan) Rules, 2011 amendedSummons in GST (See 'JEST GST on GST Home Page')I-T - When Revenue had accepted assessee as investor in previous year, it cannot change his status to trader merely because he made some profit on shares: ITATEmployee Benefits - An OverviewST - Transport of goods by air Tax payable during period 10.09.2004 to 16.09.2004 and 16.6.2005 to 14.07.2005 as there was no exemption from payment of such tax during said period: CESTATComposition scheme eligibility, process and benefitsCX - There is no provision under CCR, 2004 for denial of credit on ground that assessee has admittedly deployed inputs in excess of ideal for achieving desired output level: CESTATIAS Association condemns attack on Delhi Chief Secretary; demands immediate actionICAI removes name of O P Tulsyan from register of Members for five years in compliance with Allahabad HC orderST - Supreme Court agrees with Larger Bench CESTAT decision in Bhayana Builders - Revenue appeals dismissedCabinet clears bills on illicit deposit & chit funds regulations (See 'TIOLCorplaws')Cabinet nod for Tribunal on river disputeCabinet nod for bus bay near Indian Defence UniversityCabinet nod for coal mining methodologyCabinet okays Indo-Moroccan railway pactFive IRS officers appointed as CESTAT Members - Sanjiv Srivastava (Mumbai) + P Anjani Kr (Mumbai) + P Venkata Subba Rao (Hyderabad) + Bijay Kr (Delhi) + C L Mahar (Delhi)CBDT issues transfer order of four CITsI-T - Incriminating evidences obtained prior to date of search, cannot be roped in to make additions in case of unabated assessments: ITATPNB scam should pave road for financial transparencyBurdensome registration requirement under GST law be done away withST World Bank and International Finance Corporation are part of United Nations, therefore, there is no need to resort to definition of International Organization for extending benefit of notification 16/2002-ST: CESTATAnti Profiteering Application - An analysisCX - Merely on basis of statement given by one employee to police that raw materials worth Rs.2 crore were destroyed in fire, same cannot be taken as gospel truth: CESTATGovt keen to make agri schemes 'income-centric' rather than 'production-centric': MinisterKolkata DRI seizes 12.4 kg elephant tusk being smuggled from Assam to NepalDigital India successing becoz of people's pull: PMFish eats plastic & humans eat fish - serious health hazard: MinisterI-T - When assessee was only a licensee, not having exclusive rights over a property, vide unregistered document, it cannot claim to be owner of property for purpose of Sec 22: HCRailways relaxes upper age limit for Group C postsNo GST is leviable on goods sold/transferred while remaining in Customs bonded warehouseLeviability of IGST and as well as Compensation cess under Customs ActAG expresses concern over CBEC cases being dismissed by SC on ground of delayTime to shift focus from acronyms to gaps in performanceGST - Industry reports cumbersome procedures & high cost of compliance
GST fails exporters - needs overhaul

NOVEMBER 03, 2017

By Dinesh Kumar Agrawal, Executive Director, Khaitan & Co, Mumbai

RAPID growth of exports leads to higher economic growth and generate employment opportunities and, therefore, successive Indian governments have taken measures to promote export. One of the fundamental principles to promote export is "export goods but not the taxes", and, therefore, most of the exports are zero-rated.In the pre-GST regime of multi-layered multiple tax, it was difficult to accurately assess central, state and local taxes embedded in the exports. GST subsumed almost all indirect taxes under a single levy and, therefore, it was expected that under GST regime, exports would be "nearly" zero-rated. Nearly because electricity and petroleum fuels are still outside GST.

Export of goods and services are zero-rated under Section 16 of the IGST Act and the exporter can opt for any of the following methods for refund of taxes:

(a) Option-I: Supply goods or services under bond or Letter of Undertaking (LUT), without payment of integrated tax and claim refund of unutilised input tax credit (ITC); or

(b) Option-II: Supply goods or services on payment of integrated tax and claim refund of such tax paid thereon.

Zero-rating of tax paid on Capital goods:

Section 54 of the CGST Act provides for refund of unutilised ITC only if exports were made without payment of tax. A person can take credit of taxes paid on inward supplies of capital goods, inputs and input services. However, under GST Rule 89(4), only inputs and input services are considered for computation of refund amount. Thus, tax paid on capital goods is not zero-rated under first option, even if such capital goods has been exclusively used in processing of export goods. Under the second option, an exporter can export goods on payment of tax and seek refund thereof. Tax can be paid through electronic credit ledger without any restriction on credit taken on capital goods. Thus, tax paid on capital goods is zero-rated only under the second option.

Every exporter must invest in plant and machinery to manufacture and process goods or service for export. Such capital goods are subjected to GST. CVD exemptions given under EPCG Scheme and EOU scheme has been withdrawn under GST era. Thus, every exporter opting for the first option must bear the tax cost of capital goods which gets embedded in the exports. On the other hand, exporter opting for the second option can reclaim the tax paid on capital goods. Disparity between the two options is unwarranted and exporters must be allowed refund of tax paid on capital goods used in export.

Working capital blockage:

Initially Government had mandated for acceptance of LUT only for exporters with established export performance (status holder or export earnings of Rs.1 crore in the previous year) and others were mandated to execute bond with bank guarantee. As furnishing bank guarantee increased transaction cost and blockage of working capital, in a welcome move, the government relaxed the norms and permitted all exporters with unblemished records to furnish LUT.

However, to the dismay of exporters,refund process is yet to be enabled in the GSTN portal even after 4 months of GST rollout. It may be noted that Section 54 of the CGST Act permits immediate disbursement of 90% of the refund claim but it seems that lethargic implementation of system has taken its toll on the exporters.

To relieve exporters, recently Government has substantially reduced GST rate for penultimate supply of goods for export @0.1%. Similarly, supplies have been allowed to claim refund of tax paid on supply of goods to EOU, and against EPCG or advance authorisation. However, in view of the delay in disbursement of refund, suppliers are unlikely to accommodate exporters.


GST was supposed to encourage export but it has proved to be a big dampener. Exporters need higher working capital and forgo refund on capital goods. Government has asked Group to Ministers to suggest measures for exporters.

I believe that following measures will provide requisite relief to the exporters:

(i) Tax paid on capital goods should form part of zero-rating. Government may like to refund tax paid on capital goods in staggered manner and, therefore, may restrict amount of refund to the output tax payable on exports. Alternatively, credit attributable to a tax period on capital goods for zero-rating may be determined by applying GST Rule 43.

(ii) Ab-initio exemptions must be restored under EOU, EOU, EPCG and advance authorisation. Deemed export should also be zero-rated.

(iii) Government must provisionally disburse refund claim of ITC equal to old duty drawback amount and adjust the same at the time of regular ITC refund under Section 54 of the CGST Act.

(iv) Bond/LUT by the service exporters must be dispensed with.

(The views expressed are strictly personal.)

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site)


Sub: GST

Good article.

Posted by Samir Sinha