News Update

Requisite Checks for Appeals - Court FeeI-T - Members of Settlement Commission appointed amongst persons of integrity & outstanding ability & having special knowledge in/experience of direct taxes; unfortunate that SETCOM's orders are challenged without establishing them to be contrary to law or lacking in jurisdiction: HCThe 'taxing' story of Malabar Parota, calories notwithstanding!I-T - Unless a case of bias, fraud or malice is alleged, then Department cannot assail SETCOM's order: HCCentre allows export of 99,150 MT onion to Bangladesh, UAE, Bhutan, Bahrain, Mauritius & LankaI-T- Re-assessment vide Faceless Assessment u/s 144 of I-T Act, is barred by Section 31 of IBC 2016, which is binding upon all creditors of corporate debtor: HCPension Portals of all Pension Disbursing Banks to be integratedI-T- Resolution Plan under IBC, once approved, nullifies any claims pertaining to a period prior to approval of said Plan: HC‘Flash Mob’ drive in London seeks support for PM ModiI-T - Once assessee has produced all supporting documents which includes profit & loss account, balance sheet and copy of ITR of creditors, then identity & creditworthiness is established: ITATTo deliver political message, Pak Sessions judge abducted and then released: KPKI-T - Assessee shall provide monthly figures to arrive at year-end average of deposits received from members, interest paid thereon & investments made in FDs from external funds, for calculating Sec 80P deduction: ITATMaersk to invest USD 600 mn in Nigerian seaport infraI-T - It shall not be necessary to issue authorization u/s 132 separately in name of each person where authorization has been issued mentioning thereon more than one person: ITATChile announces 3-day national mourning after three police officers killedI-T- Since facts have not yet been verified by AO, issue of CSR expenditure can be remanded back for reconsideration: ITATIndian Coast Guard intercepts Pakistani boat with 86 kg drugs worth Rs 600 CroreI-T - Failure to substantiate cash deposits by employer during festival will not automatically lead to additions u/s 68, in absence of any opportunity of hearing: ITATGold watch of richest Titanic pax auctioned for USD 1.46 millionGST - There is no material on record to show as to why the registration is sought to be cancelled retrospectively - Order cannot be sustained: HCIraq is latest to criminalise same-sex marriage with max 15 yrs of jail-termGST - SCN does not put the petitioner to notice that the registration is liable to be cancelled retrospectively, therefore, petitioner did not have any opportunity to object to the same - Order modified: HCUndersea quake of 6.5 magnitude strikes Java; No tsunami alert issuedGST - A taxpayer's registration can be cancelled with retrospective effect only where such consequences are intended and are warranted: HCZelensky says Russia shelling oil facilities to choke supply to EuropeGST - Rule 86A - Single Judge was correct in relegating appellant to his alternate remedy of replying to SCNs and getting matter adjudicated by adjudicating authority: HC20 army men killed in blasts at army base in CambodiaST -Simultaneous filing of refund applications by service provider/KSFE and the service recipients/petitioners for same amount - Applications ought not to be rejected on technical issue when applications filed in time: HC3 Indian women from Gujarat died in mega SUV accident in USST - Court cannot examine the issue, which is only a question of fact and evidence and not of the law - Petition dismissed: HCJNU switches to NET in place of entrance test for PhD admissionsCX - Department ought not to have waited for rebate proceedings to get finalized and ought to have issued SCN within normal period: CESTATGST - fake invoice - Patanjali served Rs 27 Cr demand noticeCus - As Section 149 prior to its amendment, does not prescribe any time limit, the Board vide Circular 36/2010 cannot impose a time limit so as to decline the request for amendment of shipping bill: CESTAT
 
CX - Switchgears sold in numbers, hence, even if weighing over 25 kg each not exempted under SWAM - S. 4A correctly applied: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

NEW DELHI, OCT 09, 2017: THE appellants manufacture switchgear [CH 85.36] which is notified u/s 4A of the CEA, 1944 for the purpose of assessment on the basis of MRP.

The dispute in the present case is in relation to the switchgears weighing more than 25 kg. each and cleared to their dealers. These switch gears have been assessed by the appellants under Section 4 ibid while the adjudicating authority held that these are liable to be assessed u/s 4A as they were not directly sold to the Industrial consumers.

Having so held, the adjudicating authority went ahead to determine the MRP (as none was printed) by adopting their list prices and adding sales tax and octroi etc.

The result was confirmation of differential CE duty demand of Rs.45,37,620/- for the period January to July, 2008 alongwith interest and penalty.

The assessee is before the CESTAT.

After considering the submissions made by both sides, the Bench extracted rule 2A of the SWAM (Rules), 1977 which reads -

"Rule 2A. Applicability of the Chapter -

The provisions of this Chapter shall not apply to-

(a) Packages of commodities containing quantity of more than 25 kg. or 25 litre excluding cement and fertilizer sold in bags up to 50 kg. and,

(b) Packaged commodities meant for industrial consumers or institutional consumers.

Explanation.- For the purpose of this rule,-“(a) Institutional consumer.- Means those consumers who buy packaged commodities directly from the manufacturers/ packers for service industry like transportation [including airways, railways], hotel or any other similar service industry.

(c) Industrial Consumer.- Means those consumers who buy packaged commodities directly from the manufacturers/ packers for using the product in their industry for production, etc .]”

The CESTAT, thereafter,observed -

++ The main contention of the appellant is that packages of switchgear weighing individually more than 25 kg. are exempt from affixing MRP. But switchgear manufactured by the appellant are evidently not being sold by weight or by measure but are sold in terms of numbers. Hence such goods even if weighing over 25 kg.each, which are duly packaged and sold to the dealers by the appellants, cannot be said to be covered under the exemption under Rule 2A(a) of the above rules.

++ From the pattern of sale adopted by the appellant it is also evident that the goods are sold through dealers and not directly sold to industrial or institutional customers in bulk.

++ We also note that the commodities manufactured by the appellant are not covered by the exemption contained in Rule 34 of the P.C. Rules, 1977.

++ The activity of packing/repacking, labelling etc. on the impugned goods in their factory amounts to manufacture and in the present case are liable to duty in terms of Section 4A.

Concluding that there is no reason to interfere with the impugned order, the same was upheld and the appeal was rejected.

(See 2017-TIOL-3625-CESTAT-DEL)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.