News Update

Indian Coast Guard intercepts Pakistani boat with 86 kg drugs worth Rs 600 CroreGold watch of richest Titanic pax auctioned for USD 1.46 millionIraq is latest to criminalise same-sex marriage with max 15 yrs of jail-termUndersea quake of 6.5 magnitude strikes Java; No tsunami alert issuedZelensky says Russia shelling oil facilities to choke supply to Europe20 army men killed in blasts at army base in Cambodia3 Indian women from Gujarat died in mega SUV accident in USJNU switches to NET in place of entrance test for PhD admissionsGST - fake invoice - Patanjali served Rs 27 Cr demand noticeI-T - Bonafide claim of deduction by assessee which was accepted in first round of proceedings does not tantamount to furnishing of inaccurate particulars, simply because it was disallowed later: ITATIndia-bound oil tanker struck by Houthiā€™s missiles in Red SeaSCO Defence Ministers' Meeting endorses 'One Earth, One Family, One Future'RBI issues draft rules on digital lendingI-T - In order to invoke revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263, twin conditions of error in order and also prejudice to interest of Revenue must be established independently: ITATCRPF senior official served notice of dismissal on charges of sexual harassmentIndian Air Force ushers in Digital Transformation with DigiLocker IntegrationColumbia faculty blames leadership for police action against protestersCX - When process undertaken by assessee does not amount to manufacture, even then CENVAT credit is admissible if such inputs are cleared on payment of duty which would amount to reversal of credit availed: CESTATGoogle to inject USD 3 bn investment in data centre in IndianaCus - The equipments are teaching accessories which enable students in a class to respond to queries and these equipments are used along with ADP machine, same merits classification under CTH 8471 60 29: CESTATUN says clearing Gaza mounds of rubble to take 14 yrsST - When issue is of interpretation, appellant should not be fastened with demand for extended period, the demand confirmed for extended period is set aside: CESTAT
 
I-T - When employer-employee relationship is not there, payments made to consultant doctors not liable to provisions of Sec 192: ITAT

By TIOL News Service

KOLKATA, OCT 06, 2017: THE issue before the Tribunal is - Whether payments made to consultant doctors engaged with a hospital, without any existing employee-employer relationship, are not salary and hence, no TDS liability u/s 192 is warranted on same. YES is the answer.

Facts of the case:

The Assessee-a domestic compnay, which operates a hospital viz., Apollo Gleneagles Hospital at Kolkata, is engaged in providing health care services. The Assessee filed its return for the relevant AY. During the assessment proceeding, the AO noticed that 116 doctors were engaged by the Assessee hospital as consultants and an aggregate of Rs.52,97,98,732/- was paid to these doctors as professional fees which was subjected to TDS u/s 194J. In course of the proceedings, the AR contended that the AO failed to appreciate the fact that there was no existence of employer-employee relationship between the Assessee hospital and the consultant doctor. However, the AO ignored the Assessee’s contention and hence, considered them as employees of the Assessee hospital and held that the payments made to those doctors should be taxed u/s 192. On appeal, the CIT(A) held that the consultant doctors did not enjoy an employee-employer relationship with the Assessee hospital and therefore the AO could not hold payments made to consultant doctors as salary payment within the meaning of the section 192.

Tribunal held that,

++ the issue involved in present appeal as to whether the payments made to consultant doctors attached to the hospital are salary so as to bring into effect of section 192 instead of section 194J, is squarely covered in favour of the Assessee by the decision of this Tribunal in Assessee’s own case in ITA No. 1456/Kol/2014 for AY 2011-12, wherein, the Tribunal held that "...the payments made to the consultants doctors are not salary, and, therefore, tax is not deductible u/s 192. Hence, the relief granted to the Assessee is sustained...". As the issue involved in the present appeal as well as the material facts are similar to its own case and no controverting material has been brought on record by the Revenue, the Assessee hospital is granted relief, by respectfully following the decision of the Tribunal.

(See 2017-TIOL-1376-ITAT-KOL)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.