News Update

Indian Coast Guard on prowl; seizes 173 kg drugs from Indian fishing boat; 2 arrestedCus - High Courts are barred from hearing appeals involving issues of valuation of imported goods; appeals dismissed as not maintainable: HCIBC - When one party owes debt to another and creditor is claiming under written agreement providing for rendering 'service', debt is operational debt if claim of debt has some connection with service : SC (See 'TIOLCorplaws')SC stays HC order directing CBI to probe against WB officials’ role in teachers’ recruitment scamICG seizes 86 kg narcotics worth Rs 600 crore9 killed as two vehicles ram into each other in ChhattisgarhChief of Defence Staff Gen Anil Chauhan concludes his official visit to FranceConsumer court orders Swiggy to compensate for failure to deliver Ice CreamRequisite Checks for Appeals - Court FeeThe 'taxing' story of Malabar Parota, calories notwithstanding!I-T - Unless a case of bias, fraud or malice is alleged, then Department cannot assail SETCOM's order: HCCentre allows export of 99,150 MT onion to Bangladesh, UAE, Bhutan, Bahrain, Mauritius & LankaPension Portals of all Pension Disbursing Banks to be integratedI-T- Resolution Plan under IBC, once approved, nullifies any claims pertaining to a period prior to approval of said Plan: HC‘Flash Mob’ drive in London seeks support for PM ModiTo deliver political message, Pak Sessions judge abducted and then released: KPKChile announces 3-day national mourning after three police officers killed
 
No interest under Ss 234B & 234C to be charged on failure to pay advance tax in respect of income determined u/s 115J: HC

By TIOL News Service

AHEMDABAD, SEPTEMBER 26, 2017: THE ISSUE BEFORE THIS COURT IS - Whether interest u/s 234B and 234C could be charged on failure to pay advance tax, if the total income was assessed to tax u/s 115J of Income Tax Act. NO is the verdict.

Facts of the case:

The Revenue Department had preferred present appeal challenging the order, whereby the Tribunal had held that interest u/s 234B and 234C would not be chargeable, if the total income was assessed to tax u/s 115J of Income Tax Act.

High Court held that,

++ it is seen that at one stage, the appeal was disposed of by judgment of the Division Bench in favour of the Revenue, by relying upon the judgment of the Supreme Court in case of Joint Commissioner of Incometax v. Rolta India Ltd - 2011-TIOL-02-SC-IT-LB. The assessee thereupon filed Misc. Civil Application for review, mainly on the ground that the decision of Supreme Court in case of Rolta India Ltd was rendered in context of provisions contained in sections 115JA and 115JB, whereas judgment of Karnataka High Court in case of Kwality Biscuits Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income tax - 2003-TIOL-157-HC-KAR-IT, was in context of section 115J which was confirmed by the Supreme Court;

++ a perusal of the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Rolta India Limited makes it evident that the same was rendered in the context of the provisions of sections 115JA and 115JB of the Act, whereas the facts of the present case relate to the provisions of section 115J of the Act. The Apex Court in its decision has held that interest u/s 234B & 234C shall be payable on failure to pay advance tax in respect of tax payable under those sections, and such interest cannot be charged, where the total income is determined u/s 115J of the Act. We therefore, adopt the reasonings and answer the question in favour of the assessee.

(See 2017-TIOL-2002-HC-AHM-IT)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.