News Update

Unveil One Nation; One Debt Code; One Compliance Rule for Centre & StatesChina moves WTO against US tax subsidies for EVs & renewable energyMore on non-doms - The UK Spring Budget 2024 (See TII Edit)Notorious history-sheeter Mukhtar Ansari succumbs to cardiac arrest in UP jailTraining Program for Cambodian civil servants commences at MussoorieNY imposes USD 15 congestion taxCBIC revises tariff value of edible oils, gold & silver45 killed as bus races into ravine in South AfricaCBIC directs all Customs offices to remain open on Saturday & SundayBankman-Fried jailed for 25 yrs in FTX scamI-T- Once the citizen deposits the tax upon coming to know of his liability, it cannot be said that he has deliberately or willfully evaded the depositing of tax and interest in terms of Section 234A can be waived: HCHouthis attack continues in Red Sea; US military shoots down 4 dronesI-T- Secured creditor has priority charge over secured asset, over claims of I-T Department & other Departments; any excess amount recovered by Secured Creditor from auction of secured asset, over & above the dues payable to it, are to be remitted to the Departments: HCFederal Govt hands out USD 60 mn to rebuild collapsed bridge in BaltimoreI-T - Receipts of sale of scrap being part & parcel of activity and being proximate thereto would also be within ambit of gains derived from industrial undertaking for purpose of computing deduction u/s 80-IB: HCCanadian School Boards sue social media titans for 4 bn Canadian dollar in damagesI-T - Once assssee on year of reversal has paid taxes on excess provision and similar feature appeared in earlier years and assesee had payments for liquidated damages on delay of deliverables, no adverse inference can be drawn: HCFormer IPS officer Sanjiv Bhatt jailed for 20 yrs for planting drugs to frame lawyerST - Software development service & IT-enabled service provided by assessee was exempt from tax during relevant period, by virtue of CBEC's Notification & Circular; demands raised for such period not sustainable: CESTATUN says Households waste across world is now at least one billion meals a dayCus - Order rejecting exporter's request for conversion of Shipping Bills on grounds that the same has been made by exporter beyond period of three months from date of Let Export Order in terms of CBEC Circular No. 36/2010-Cus : CESTATIndia, China hold fresh dialogue for complete disengagement on Western borders: MEACus - No Cess is payable when Basic Customs Duty is found to be Nil: CESTATThakur says India is prepared for 2036 OlympicsCX - As per settled law, a right acquired as result of a statutory provision, cannot be taken away retrospectively unless said statutory provision so provides or by necessary implication has such effect: CESTAT
 
I-T - If assessee reports some bogus purchases in return but same goes unexamined, and later on re-assessment is initiated based on certain tangible materials received from Investigation wing, such action is not to be construed as change of opinion: HC

By TIOL News Service

AHMEDABAD, SEPT 21, 2017: THE issue before the Bench is - Whether if assessee reports some bogus purchases in its return but the same goes unexamined, and later on re-assessment is initiated based on certain tangible materials received from Investigation wing, such action is to be construed as change of opinion. NO is the verdict.

Facts of the case

The assessee company is engaged in trading activities of agro processing, maize processing, cotton spinning power plant and windmill. For the AY 2008-09, the assessee declared income of Rs.54.44 crores. After scrutiny, the AO passed an order under section 143(3) by making several additions. During the assessment, purchases made by the assessee from certain traders including one M/s. Vishal Traders came to be scrutinized. The Assessing Officer having held that such purchases were bogus made the additions. Upon further appeals by the assessee before the Appellate Commissioner and the Tribunal, the disallowances were limited to 5% of the purchases.

The AO issued notice for re-opening of assessment and made several additions and determined the total income at Rs.88.69 crores. Besides, the AO deemed certain purchases made by the assessee from certin traders, to be bogus.

On hearing the petition, the High Court held that,

++ a close examination of the reasons recorded for re-opening the assessment, there was sufficient material available with the AO to reopen the assessment, based on a belief that taxable income had escaped assessment. Serious infirmities were pointed out in the transactions of the assessee with a certain trader. Substantial amounts were received from various sources in the bank accounts which were withdrawn in cash shortly after receipt. Summons issued by the department were not responded. Even the entity was not found existing at the given address. The proprietor of the concern could not be served since he was not found at the address supplied and the rest of the members present refused to accept the summons. Genuine and repeated efforts were made by the department to serve the summons to the said entity to produce documents and information. No response was received from the trader. Independently of the non-service or non-response to the summons by the trader, there were other transactions which were prima facie dubious. The assessee had paid a sum of Rs.4.48 crores to the trader by way of purchases;

++ these transactions were not examined by the AO in the original assessment proceedings, though sufficient evidence was found, suggesting that not all purchases made by the assessee were genuine. In fact though the appellate authority and the Tribunal reduced the addition made by the AO on this count, in theory, the non-genuineness of some of the purchases was approved by the Tribunal also. So far as the assessee's purchases from the trader are concerned, they were not subject matter of the assessment proceedings and in that view of the matter the question of change of opinion would not arise. In any event, when fresh material was unearthed by the department through the investigation wing who had inquired into the transactions of trader, neither the question of change of opinion nor the concept of full disclosure may have a bearing. If the purchases of the assessee from the trader were bogus, sales and the entries were in the nature of accommodation entries, merely because the assessee disclosed such entries in the return filed and also showed such purchases in the books of accounts would hardly be sufficient to advance the arguments of full and true disclosure;

++ the question of sufficiency of material available with the AO to form a belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment must be seen in light of limited jurisdiction, review and the self restraint imposed by the courts at the threshold stage. In a writ petition, the court would be primarily concerned with the question whether the AO had information enabling the forming of a bona fide belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment. The court would not evaluate the evidence at that stage, nor is the AO expected to demonstrate with certainty that the addition will certainly be sustained in the reassessment proceedings. What is required at this stage to enable the AO to issue the notice for reopening the assessment is the tangible material on record upon consideration of which he can form a reasonable belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment. Such belief has to be one which is formed bona fide upon perusal of the materials at his command and unless it can be stated that the formation of the belief is perverse in the sense no reasonable person could on the available material on record form such a belief, the court would not interfere with the notice for reopening.

(See 2017-TIOL-1981-HC-AHM-IT)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

AR not Afar by SK Rahman

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri Shailendra Kumar, Trustee, TIOL Trust, giving welcome speech at TIOL Awards 2023




Shri M C Joshi, Former Chairman, CBDT




Address by Shri Buggana Rajendranath, Hon'ble Finance Minister of Andhra Pradesh at TIOL Awards 2023