News Update

Elected Women of PRIs to Participate in CPD57 in New YorkIndia, New Zealand to have deeper collaboration in Pharma, Agriculture and Food ProcessingIndia’s manufacturing PMI marginally slides to 58.8 in April monthDefence Secretary & Secretary General of MoD, Indonesia to co-chair 7th Joint Committee meetingAbove 7000 Yoga enthusiasts practised Common Yoga Protocol in SuratManeka Gandhi declares assets worth Rs 97 Cr and files nomination papers from SultanpurGlobal Debt & Fiscal Silhouette rising! Do Elections contribute to fiscal slippages?ISRO study reveals possibility of water ice in polar cratersGST - Statutory requirement to carry the necessary documents should not be made redundant - Mistake committed by appellant is not extending e-way bill after the expiry, despite such liberty being granted under the Rules attracts penalty: HCBiden says migration has been good for US economyGST - Tax paid under wrong head of IGST instead of CGST/SGST - 'Relevant Date' for refund would be the date when tax is paid under the correct head: HCUS says NO to Rafah operation unless humanitarian plan is in place + Colombia snaps off ties with IsraelGST - Petitioner was given no opportunity to object to retrospective cancellation of registration - Order is also bereft of any details: HCMay Day protests in Paris & Istanbul; hundreds arrestedGST - Proper officer should have at least considered the reply on merits before forming an opinion - Ex facie, proper officer has not applied his mind: HCSaudi fitness instructor jailed for social media post - Amnesty International seeks releaseGST - A Rs.17.90 crores demand confirmed on Kendriya Bhandar by observing that reply is insufficient - Non-application of mind is clearly written all over the order: HCDelhi HC orders DGCA to deregister GO First’s aircraftGST - Neither the SCN nor the order spell the reasons for retrospective cancellation of registration, therefore, they are set aside: HCIndia successfully tests SMART anti-submarine missile-assisted torpedo systemKiller heatwave kills hundreds of thousands of fish in Southern VietnamHong Kong struck by close to 1000 lightningColumbia Univ campus turns into ‘American Gaza’ - Pro-Palestinian students & counter-protesters clashMissile-Assisted Release of Torpedo system successfully flight-tested by DRDO
 
I-T - Any transfer from Share holder's A/c to Policy holder's A/c shown as part of surplus from insurance business in 'actuarial valuation', cannot be taxed u/s 44: ITAT

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, AUG 08, 2017: THE ISSUE BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL IS - Whether any transfer from Share holder's A/c to Policy holder's A/c shown as part of 'surplus from insurance business' in the 'actuarial valuation', can be taxed u/s 44 of I-T Act. NO is the answer.

Facts of the case:

The Assessee i.e., M/s. Future Generali India Life Insurance Co. Ltd. filed its return declaring total loss of Rs. 300,45,37,430. Subsequently, the same was revised disclosing total loss of Rs. 320,16,20,117 following the judgement of Bombay High Court in the case of CIT vs. Life Insurance Corporation of India Ltd. - 2011-TIOL-483-HC-MUM-IT in respect of loss from pension business u/s 10(23AAB). The AO however made an addition of Rs. 5,83,46,630/- representing the surplus as disclosed in Form – 1. On appeal, the CIT(A) held that the working of actuarial surplus / deficit was in accordance with the relevant regulations as per IRDA guidelines and the loss disclosed in the computation of income was according to the corresponding provisions of Section 44 r/w Rule 2 of the First Schedule of the Act. Therefore, the CIT(A) directed the AO to delete the addition of Rs. 583,46,630/- on account of actuarial surplus.

On appeal, the ITAT held that,

++ it is found that Bombay High Court in the case of ICICI Prudential Insurance Co. Ltd. has held that "where assessee was carrying on life insurance business and Tribunal following a decision of Supreme Court, while determining assessee's income u/s 44, had taken into consideration total surplus as arrived at by actuarial valuation and further held that income from shareholders account was also to be taxed as a part of life insurance business, there was no substantial question of law arising for consideration". Reference was made to the decision in LIC of India vs. CIT, wherein the Supreme Court has held that the AO has no power to modify the account after actuarial valuation is done. Respectfully following the same, this Tribunal holds that transfer from Share Holders Account to Policy Holder's Account and shown as part of 'surplus' in the 'actuarial valuation' was only transfer of capital asset and not taxable u/s 44 of the I-T Act r/w Rule 2 of the first schedule;

(See 2017-TIOL-1106-ITAT-MUM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.