News Update

Cus - When there is nothing on record to show that appellant had connived with other three persons to import AA batteries under the guise of declaring goods as Calcium Carbonate, penalty imposed on appellant are set aside: HCCongress fields Rahul Gandhi from Rae Bareli and Kishori Lal Sharma from AmethiCus - The penalty imposed on assessee was set aside by Tribunal against which revenue is in appeal is far below the threshold limit fixed under Notification issued by CBDT, thus on the ground of monetary policy, revenue cannot proceed with this appeal: HCGST -Since both the SCNs and orders pertain to same tax period raising identical demand by two different officers of same jurisdiction, proceedings on SCNs are clubbed and shall be re-adjudicated by one proper officer: HCFormer Jharkhand HC Chief Justice, Justice Sanjaya Kumar Mishra appointed as President of GST TribunalSale of building constructed on leasehold land - GST implicationI-T - If assessee is not charging VAT paid on purchase of goods & services to its P&L account i.e., not claiming it as expenditure, there is no requirement to treat refund of such VAT as income: ITATBengal Governor restricts entry of State FM and local police into Raj BhawanI-T - Interest received u/s 28 of Land Acquisition Act 1894 awarded by Court is capital receipt being integral part of enhanced compensation and is exempt u/s 10(37): ITATCops flatten camps of protesting students at Columbia UnivI-T - No additions are permitted on account of bogus purchases, if evidence submitted on purchase going into export and further details provided of sellers remaining uncontroverted: ITATTurkey stops all trades with Israel over GazaI-T- Provisions of Section 56(2)(vii)(a) cannot be invoked, where a necessary condition of the money received without consideration by assessee, has not been fulfilled: ITATGirl students advised by Pak college to keep away from political eventsI-T- As per settled position in law, cooperative housing society can claim deduction u/s 80P, if interest is earned on deposit of own funds in nationalised banks: ITATApple reports lower revenue despite good start of the yearI-T- Since difference in valuation is minor, considering specific exclusion provision benefit is granted to assessee : ITATHome-grown tech of thermal camera transferred to IndustryI-T - Presumption u/s 292C would apply only to person proceeded u/s 153A and not for assessee u/s 153C: ITATECI asks parties to cease registering voters for beneficiary-oriented schemes under guise of surveys
 
Cus - Restitution of amounts deposited towards security is not covered by time limit specified in section 27 of Customs Act: High Court

By TIOL News Service

CHENNAI, JUNE 20, 2017: THE CESTAT had by its order dated 05.08.2004 - 2004-TIOL-732-CESTAT-DEL while allowing the appeals of the importer held that the time limit specified in Section 27 of the Customs Act is not applicable to the refund of the amount realized by the Government by enforcing the bank guarantee, as this does not represent any duty under the Customs Act.

Revenue is in appeal against this order before the Madras High Court.

After considering the submissions made by both sides, the High Court observed thus -

+ Argument (by the Revenue counsel) that the Bank Guarantees were encashed towards payment of duty, is, completely fallacious, as the moment EODCs were furnished, the said EODC would relate back to the date, when, the import was made . The EODC's and other import documents, when read together, even according to the appellant, would demonstrate that respondent No.2 had complied with the conditions of Notification No.110/95 and, was, therefore, entitled to avail of the benefit of concessional rate of duty.

+ In our view, there is no error, in the approach adopted by the Tribunal. The reliance by the Tribunal on the judgment of the Supreme Court rendered in Oswal Agro Mills Limited - 2002-TIOL-629-SC- CX is also in order.

+ According to us, the ratio of the judgment (Oswal Agro Mills Limited) is that the purpose for which a Bank Guarantee is furnished has to be examined keeping in mind the background facts and the reason, why it was furnished in the first place. If the Bank Guarantee is furnished, as in this case, in the form of a security, towards fulfillment of an obligation, then surely, provisions of Section 27 of the Act will not apply.

+ In our opinion, what has to be borne in mind, is as to the nature of the amount deposited in whichever form. If, the amount deposited, is, towards security, surely, once the Assessee succeeds, he is entitled to seek restitution. Restitution, in such like circumstances, is not covered by Section 27 of the Act.

Relying on the decisions in JRAJ Exports (P) Limited - 2007-TIOL-786-HC-MAD-CUS, Aristo Spinners Pvt. Ltd. - 2008-TIOL-87-HC-MAD-CUS and Vamadev Exports - 2015-TIOL-1959-HC-MAD-CUS, the High Court concluded that the questions of law framed in the matter have to be answered in favour of the Assessee and against the Revenue.

The Revenue appeals were dismissed.

(See 2017-TIOL-1137-HC-MAD-CUS)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.