News Update

Former Jharkhand HC Chief Justice, Justice Sanjaya Kumar Mishra appointed as President of GST TribunalSale of building constructed on leasehold land - GST implicationI-T - If assessee is not charging VAT paid on purchase of goods & services to its P&L account i.e., not claiming it as expenditure, there is no requirement to treat refund of such VAT as income: ITATBengal Governor restricts entry of State FM and local police into Raj BhawanI-T - Interest received u/s 28 of Land Acquisition Act 1894 awarded by Court is capital receipt being integral part of enhanced compensation and is exempt u/s 10(37): ITATCops flatten camps of protesting students at Columbia UnivI-T - No additions are permitted on account of bogus purchases, if evidence submitted on purchase going into export and further details provided of sellers remaining uncontroverted: ITATTurkey stops all trades with Israel over GazaI-T- Provisions of Section 56(2)(vii)(a) cannot be invoked, where a necessary condition of the money received without consideration by assessee, has not been fulfilled: ITATGirl students advised by Pak college to keep away from political eventsI-T- As per settled position in law, cooperative housing society can claim deduction u/s 80P, if interest is earned on deposit of own funds in nationalised banks: ITATApple reports lower revenue despite good start of the yearI-T- Since difference in valuation is minor, considering specific exclusion provision benefit is granted to assessee : ITATHome-grown tech of thermal camera transferred to IndustryI-T - Presumption u/s 292C would apply only to person proceeded u/s 153A and not for assessee u/s 153C: ITATECI asks parties to cease registering voters for beneficiary-oriented schemes under guise of surveysST - Since Department itself admits that service carried out by appellant is that of 'Mining Services' w.e.f. 01.06.2007, thus demand for earlier period has been made only to fasten excess Service Tax demand on appellant which cannot sustain: CESTATICG rescues fisherman with head injury onboard IFB St. Francis off the Gujarat coastCX - When physical stock verification carried out by Officers was not fool proof and there were anomalies, benefit of doubt should be extended to assessee, duty demand confirmed on alleged clandestine removal is not sustainable: CESTAT
 
I-T - Lumpsum consideraton paid for acquiring technical knowhow for purpose of extension of existing business, is allowable deduction u/s 35AB: HC

By TIOL News Service

AHEMDABAD, JUNE 19, 2017: THE ISSUE BEFORE THE COURT IS - Whether expenditure incurred by way of lumpsum consideraton for acquiring technical knowhow for the purpose of extension of the existing business, is allowable deduction u/s 35AB. YES is the verdict.

Facts of the case:

The assessee is engaged in the business of manufacturing soaps. During the relevant period, the assessee company had expended certain amounts for acquiring technical knowhow for the purpose of setting up a new manufacturing unit of soda ash. 1/6th of such expenditure was claimed by way of deduction during this assessment year 1999-2000 in terms of section 35AB of the Income Tax Act. The AO disallowed the claim on the ground that the assessee had not yet started the soda ash project. In the opinion of the AO the business had not commenced and the assessee was, therefore, not entitled to the deduction. On appeal, the ITAT held that the fact that the business had not started was of no consequence. In the opinion of the Tribunal the essential requirements for applicability of Section 35AB were that the assessee should have paid amount by way of lumpsum for acquiring technical knowhow, that such technical knowhow should be capable of being used for the purpose of business of the assessee. If these requirements were satisfied the assessee could claim the deductions spread over six years from the year of initial expenditure.

On appeal, the HC held that,

++ the counsel pointed out that the setting up of soda ash factory by the assessee is considered to be extension of existing business of manufacturing soap. Contrary contention of the Revenue came to be rejected by this Court in case of Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Nirma Ltd. - 2014-TIOL-193-HC-AHM-IT. In any view of the matter, therefore, deduction u/s 35AB cannot be denied to the assessee. This Court had confirmed the decision of the Tribunal that the setting up of the manufacturing facility of soda ash was by way of an extension of the existing business of the assessee of manufacturing soap. That being the situation, deduction u/s 35AB cannot be denied. In plain terms, sub section (1) of section 35AB grants exemption to the extent of 1/6th of the expenditure incurred by the assessee by way of lumpsum payment towards consideration for acquiring technical knowhow for the use for the purpose of the business. These conditions are satisfied. The question is, therefore, answered in the negative.

(See 2017-TIOL-1128-HC-AHM-IT)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.