News Update

Cus - When there is nothing on record to show that appellant had connived with other three persons to import AA batteries under the guise of declaring goods as Calcium Carbonate, penalty imposed on appellant are set aside: HCCongress fields Rahul Gandhi from Rae Bareli and Kishori Lal Sharma from AmethiCus - The penalty imposed on assessee was set aside by Tribunal against which revenue is in appeal is far below the threshold limit fixed under Notification issued by CBDT, thus on the ground of monetary policy, revenue cannot proceed with this appeal: HCGST -Since both the SCNs and orders pertain to same tax period raising identical demand by two different officers of same jurisdiction, proceedings on SCNs are clubbed and shall be re-adjudicated by one proper officer: HCFormer Jharkhand HC Chief Justice, Justice Sanjaya Kumar Mishra appointed as President of GST TribunalSale of building constructed on leasehold land - GST implicationI-T - If assessee is not charging VAT paid on purchase of goods & services to its P&L account i.e., not claiming it as expenditure, there is no requirement to treat refund of such VAT as income: ITATBengal Governor restricts entry of State FM and local police into Raj BhawanI-T - Interest received u/s 28 of Land Acquisition Act 1894 awarded by Court is capital receipt being integral part of enhanced compensation and is exempt u/s 10(37): ITATCops flatten camps of protesting students at Columbia UnivI-T - No additions are permitted on account of bogus purchases, if evidence submitted on purchase going into export and further details provided of sellers remaining uncontroverted: ITATTurkey stops all trades with Israel over GazaI-T- Provisions of Section 56(2)(vii)(a) cannot be invoked, where a necessary condition of the money received without consideration by assessee, has not been fulfilled: ITATGirl students advised by Pak college to keep away from political eventsI-T- As per settled position in law, cooperative housing society can claim deduction u/s 80P, if interest is earned on deposit of own funds in nationalised banks: ITATApple reports lower revenue despite good start of the yearI-T- Since difference in valuation is minor, considering specific exclusion provision benefit is granted to assessee : ITATHome-grown tech of thermal camera transferred to IndustryI-T - Presumption u/s 292C would apply only to person proceeded u/s 153A and not for assessee u/s 153C: ITATECI asks parties to cease registering voters for beneficiary-oriented schemes under guise of surveys
 
I-T - Membership fee received for number of years was required to be considered as an advance, and was required to be taxed over period of time proportionately: HC

By TIOL News Service

AHEMDABAD, JUNE 15, 2017: THE ISSUE BEFORE THE COURT IS - Whether the membership fee received for number of years was required to be considered as an advance, and thereafter as and when the business commenced, the amount of liability was required to be taxed over a period of time proportionately. YES is the verdict.

Facts of the case:

The issue in the present apeal pertains to spreading over of the receipt of membership fee across a span of the membership duration on accrual basis. The AO was of the opinion that the amount having been received by the assessee in the year under consideration, the assessee had to surrender to the Tax in the said year itself. On appeal, the CIT(A) as well as the Tribunal reversed the decision of AO relying on earlier year considerations.

On appeal, the HC held that,

++ it is seen that the Division Bench of this Court in Tax Appeal No.1159 of 2016 and connected appeals has considered the similar question and decided the same against the revenue by observing that: "....The main dispute in all these appeals is with regard to the correctness of the method of accounting of the assessee company for recording the receipt by way of membership fee and the expenses by way of commission and insurance premium. The assessee company is following mercantile system of accounting but the dispute is when the assessee has issued the facility card for a number of years, whether the membership fee received for number of years accrues in the year in which the card is issued or whether it should be spread over to the number of years for which the card is issued....Under such circumstances, the amount received by way of membership fees was required to be considered as an advance and thereafter as and when the business commenced the amount of liability was required to be taxed over a period of time proportionately. The amount of membership fees would be considered as income from the year the business of the assessee commenced. The Tribunal has rightly considered that the method of accounting should be such from which the correct profit of each year can be deducted and that as per the method adopted by the Revenue, the profit in the year in which the card is issued would be more resulting in loss/less profit in the year in which the services will be rendered by the assesseee. We are of the opinion that when the services are rendered partially, revenue is to be shown proportionate to the degree of completion of the service and therefore the assessee was justified in spreading over the amount of membership fee and expenses...." In the result, the question is answered in favour of Assessee.

(See 2017-TIOL-1106-HC-AHM-IT)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.