News Update

India-Ghana Joint Trade Committee meeting held in AccraGhana agrees to activate UPI links in 6 monthsGST - Record does not reflect that any opportunity was given to petitioner to clarify its reply or furnish further documents/details - In such scenario, proper officer could not have formed an opinion - Matter remitted: HCED seizes about 20 kg gold from locker of a cyber scammer in HaryanaGST - Mapping of PAN number with GST number - No fault of petitioner - Respondent authorities directed to activate GST number within two weeks: HCGST - Circular 183/2022 - Petitioner to prove his case that he had received the supply and paid the tax to the supplier/dealer - Matter remitted: HCGST -Petitioner to produce all documents as required under summons -Petitioner to be heard by respondent and a decision to be taken, first on the preliminary issue raised with regard to applicability of CGST/SGST: HCGST - s.73 - Extension of time limit for issuance of order - Notifications 13/2022-CT and 09/2023-CT are not ultra vires s.168A of the Act, 2017: HCSun releases two solar storms - Earth has come in its wayRequisite Checks for Appeals - RespondentInheritance Tax row - A golden opportunity to end 32-years long Policy Paralysis on DTCThe Heat is on: Preserving Earth's Climate in the Face of Global WarmingVAT - Timeline for frefund must be followed mandatorily while recovering dues under Delhi VAT Act: SCIndia, Australia to work closely for collaborative projectsCX - All the information was available to department in 2003 itself, therefore, SCN issued four years after gathering information is not sustainable and is highly barred by limitation: HCPowerful voices of amazing women leaders resonated at UN Hqs75 International visitors from 23 countries arrive to watch world's largest elections unfoldCentre asks States to improve organ donation frequencyCus - Revenue involved in the appeal filed by Commissioner is far below the threshold monetary limit fixed by the CBEC, therefore, department cannot proceed with this appeal - Appeal stands disposed of: HCAdani Port to develop port in PhilippinesUS Nurse convicted of killing 17 patients - 700 yrs of jail-term awarded
 
Cus – Appellant cannot be allowed to keep an advantage which he obtained by fraud : CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, JUNE 08, 2017: APPELLANT imported Pregnancy (HCQ) Test Strip and Pregnancy (HCQ) Test Cassette declaring that the goods are entitled to concessional rate of duty under Notification No. 21/2002-Cus.

Incidentally, the benefit was claimed without satisfying condition of the said notification and, therefore, in later proceedings the demand of customs duty was confirmed.

Before the CESTAT, the appellant submitted that Customs had examined the goods as well as the documents while clearing the same and, therefore, there should not be denial of exemption benefit.

The Bench inter alia placed reliance on a plethora of decisions of the apex court viz. Essar Oil Ltd. – 2004-TIOL-84-SC-CUS , S.P. Changalvaraya Naidu v. Jagannath [1994 (1) SCC 1], Ashok Leyland Ltd. v. State of T.N. and Another - 2004-TIOL-09-SC-CT , Gowrishankar v. Joshi Amha Shankar Family Trust , [1996 (3) SCC 310] and concluded that the appellant had committed an act of fraud on Revenue.

It was also observed -

"3. Appellant made Customs to believe that it is entitled to concessional rate of duty without having any evidence in that regard. Law is well settled that whoever makes the other to believe on the unbelievable, that is deception irrespective of the result of the belief. When the appellant claimed grant of exemption benefit in the Bill of Entry in terms of a notification without having any evidence to fulfill the conditions thereof, it should have restrained from making such claim.

x x x

6. When no evidence was led by appellant to claim the exemption, that established deliberate mis-declaration to Customs. Customs proved its case against the appellant. Appellant made attempt to be enriched at the cost of Revenue making deliberate mis-declaration. That made the goods liable to confiscation being smuggled goods under section 2(39) read with section 2(33) of the Customs Act, 1962. Questionable conduct and oblique motive of the appellant contributed to its implication to the charge."

The appeal was dismissed.

(See 2017-TIOL-1921-CESTAT-MUM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.