News Update

Indian Coast Guard on prowl; seizes 173 kg drugs from Indian fishing boat; 2 arrestedCus - High Courts are barred from hearing appeals involving issues of valuation of imported goods; appeals dismissed as not maintainable: HCIBC - When one party owes debt to another and creditor is claiming under written agreement providing for rendering 'service', debt is operational debt if claim of debt has some connection with service : SC (See 'TIOLCorplaws')SC stays HC order directing CBI to probe against WB officials’ role in teachers’ recruitment scamICG seizes 86 kg narcotics worth Rs 600 crore9 killed as two vehicles ram into each other in ChhattisgarhChief of Defence Staff Gen Anil Chauhan concludes his official visit to FranceConsumer court orders Swiggy to compensate for failure to deliver Ice CreamRequisite Checks for Appeals - Court FeeThe 'taxing' story of Malabar Parota, calories notwithstanding!I-T - Unless a case of bias, fraud or malice is alleged, then Department cannot assail SETCOM's order: HCCentre allows export of 99,150 MT onion to Bangladesh, UAE, Bhutan, Bahrain, Mauritius & LankaPension Portals of all Pension Disbursing Banks to be integratedI-T- Resolution Plan under IBC, once approved, nullifies any claims pertaining to a period prior to approval of said Plan: HC‘Flash Mob’ drive in London seeks support for PM ModiTo deliver political message, Pak Sessions judge abducted and then released: KPKChile announces 3-day national mourning after three police officers killed
 
CX – If one person hears and other decides, then personal hearing becomes an empty formality - Matter remanded: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, JUNE 02, 2017: APPEALS have been filed against the order dated 30.04.2007 passed by the CCE, Belapur.

The appeals were heard recently by the CESTAT.

On perusal of paragraph 31 of the adjudication order, the Bench remarked that the adjudicating authority had followed the findings of his predecessor and passed the order without examining the matter before him objectively .

It was further observed –

"Law being well settled in the case of Gullapalli Nageshwar Rao vs. Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation – AIR 1958 SC 308 that a decision must be of the same person who has heard the matter and applied his mind. Therefore, if one person hears and other decides, then the personal hearing becomes an empty formality. This ground alone is enough to remand the matter back to the learned adjudicating authority to grant a fresh hearing to the appellant on all issues which were subject matter of the show cause notice…"

The appeals were remanded to the adjudicating authority.

Reference in passing:

1053/02/2017-CX, Dated: March 10, 2017 [ Master Circular on Show Cause Notice, Adjudication and Recovery]

16.  Transfer of adjudicating authority:  Adjudicating officers are expected to issue order-in-original before being relieved in cases where personal hearing has been completed. The successor in office cannot issue any order on the basis of personal hearing conducted by the predecessor. The successor in office should offer a fresh hearing to the noticee before deciding the case and issuing adjudication order/formal order.

(See 2017-TIOL-1841-CESTAT-MUM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.