News Update

Cus - When there is nothing on record to show that appellant had connived with other three persons to import AA batteries under the guise of declaring goods as Calcium Carbonate, penalty imposed on appellant are set aside: HCCongress fields Rahul Gandhi from Rae Bareli and Kishori Lal Sharma from AmethiCus - The penalty imposed on assessee was set aside by Tribunal against which revenue is in appeal is far below the threshold limit fixed under Notification issued by CBDT, thus on the ground of monetary policy, revenue cannot proceed with this appeal: HCGST -Since both the SCNs and orders pertain to same tax period raising identical demand by two different officers of same jurisdiction, proceedings on SCNs are clubbed and shall be re-adjudicated by one proper officer: HCFormer Jharkhand HC Chief Justice, Justice Sanjaya Kumar Mishra appointed as President of GST TribunalSale of building constructed on leasehold land - GST implicationI-T - If assessee is not charging VAT paid on purchase of goods & services to its P&L account i.e., not claiming it as expenditure, there is no requirement to treat refund of such VAT as income: ITATBengal Governor restricts entry of State FM and local police into Raj BhawanI-T - Interest received u/s 28 of Land Acquisition Act 1894 awarded by Court is capital receipt being integral part of enhanced compensation and is exempt u/s 10(37): ITATCops flatten camps of protesting students at Columbia UnivI-T - No additions are permitted on account of bogus purchases, if evidence submitted on purchase going into export and further details provided of sellers remaining uncontroverted: ITATTurkey stops all trades with Israel over GazaI-T- Provisions of Section 56(2)(vii)(a) cannot be invoked, where a necessary condition of the money received without consideration by assessee, has not been fulfilled: ITATGirl students advised by Pak college to keep away from political eventsI-T- As per settled position in law, cooperative housing society can claim deduction u/s 80P, if interest is earned on deposit of own funds in nationalised banks: ITATApple reports lower revenue despite good start of the yearI-T- Since difference in valuation is minor, considering specific exclusion provision benefit is granted to assessee : ITATHome-grown tech of thermal camera transferred to IndustryI-T - Presumption u/s 292C would apply only to person proceeded u/s 153A and not for assessee u/s 153C: ITATECI asks parties to cease registering voters for beneficiary-oriented schemes under guise of surveys
 
Impact of larger bench order in GST regime

MAY 08, 2017

By LS Karthikeyan, Advocate, Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan

IN its order dated 20.04.2017 [2017-TIOL-1414-CESTAT-DEL-LB], Larger Bench of the Tribunal has held that 'both the appellate proceedings i.e. before the first appellate authority and before the Tribunal, if it is to be treated as independent provisions' and 'in order to prefer an appeal before the Tribunal, an assessee/appellant needs to deposit 10% of the amount of duty confirmed or the penalty... irrespective of the amounts equivalent to 7.5% deposited while preferring an appeal to the first appellate authority'.

The LB has not addressed the controversy whether an assessee/appellant who had paid the entire amount of duty / tax at the time of or earlier to filing the appeal (either during investigation / audit etc), but still contesting the demand is also required to deposit 7.5% or 10% at the time of filing the first or second appeal.

The answer to the question would have its impact under the GST regime also.

Section 107 of the CGST Act provides for 'Appeals to Appellate Authority'. Sub-section (6) thereunder states:

'No appeal shall be filed under sub-section (1), unless the Appellant has paid –

(a) In full, such part of the amount of tax, interest, fine, fee and penalty arising from the impugned order, as is admitted by him; and

(b) a sum equal to ten per cent, of the remaining amount of tax in dispute arising from the said order, in relation to which the appeal has been filed'.

Section 112 (Appeals to Appellate Tribunal) under sub-section (8) provides:

'No appeal shall be filed under sub-section (1), unless the Appellant has paid -

(a) In full, such part of the amount of tax, interest, fine, fee and penalty arising from the impugned order, as is admitted by him; and

(b) a sum equal to twenty per cent, of the remaining amount of tax in dispute, in addition to the amount paid under sub-section (6) of Section 107, arising from the said order, in relation to which the appeal has been filed'.

On a plain reading, the provision indicates that the undisputed tax amount with interest, fine, fee and penalty should be deposited for filing the appeal. In addition, 10% of the disputed tax amount has to be deposited for appeal before the Appellate authority; an additional 20% of the disputed tax amount is to be deposited (while the 10% deposited earlier would stay with the Government) for appeal before the Tribunal i.e. 30% of the disputed tax.

However, the provisions of even such a seemingly innocuous / direct provision can be given a twist.

It can be noted that 112(8)(b) requires payment in addition to amount paid under Section 107(6) and not clause (b) of 107(6) alone and can be interpreted to mean that while filing appeal before the Tribunal the Appellant should have paid:

- the admitted liability in full (again) - 112(8)(a); and

- 20% of the remaining amount of tax + (100% of the admitted liability + 10% of remaining amount of tax – already paid while filing appeal before the Appellate Authority) being the literal meaning of 112(8)(b).

Isn't that the interpretation of law laid down by the Larger Bench to Section 35F / 129E? Appeals to the Tribunal under GST Act(s) is not in the horizon as of now. But the point is worth contemplating now itself!!!!

(The views expressed are strictly personal.)

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site)

 


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.