News Update

Musk defers India’s trip citing heavy Tesla obligationsIndia needs to design legislative pills to euthanise tax-induced expatriation!I-T- Exercise of jurisdiction u/s 263 is invalid if AO has taken particular view, which though, may not be only view, but certainly can be possible view : ITATTorrential rains cause havoc in Pakistan; 87 killedI-T- Additions framed on account of unexplained money upheld as assessee was unable to prove source of cash deposited in assessee's bank account : ITATUS imposes sanctions on 3 Chinese firms and one from Belarus for transfering missile tech to PakistanCX - Appellant has regularly filed statutory returns on monthly basis and the fact of clearance of goods and availment of credit was duly reflected in returns but same has not been examined by authorities below, impugned order is not sustainable: CESTATDubai terribly water-logged as it has no storm drainsST - When services are received from separate source & accounted separately in separate ledgers, there cannot be any question of clubbing them under one category: CESTATEU online content rules tightened against adult content firmsCus - The continuous suspension of license of Customs Broker without either conducting an inquiry or issuing a notice for revocation of license or imposition of penalty is bad in law and needs to be set aside: CESTATEV market cools off in US; Ford, GM eyeing gas-powered trucksApple China tosses out WhatsApp & Threads from App store after being orderedChina announces launch of new military cyber corpsRailways operates record number of additional Trains in Summer Season 2024GST - Assessing officer took into account the evidence placed on record and drew conclusions - Bench is, therefore, of the view that petitioner should present a statutory appeal: HC1st phase polling - Close to 60% voter turnout recordedMinistry of Law to organise Conference on Criminal Justice System tomorrowGST - To effectively contest the demand and provide an opportunity to petitioner to place all relevant documents, matter remanded but by protecting revenue interest: HCGovt appoints New Directors for 6 IITsNexus between Election Manifesto and Budget 2024 in July!Israel launches missile attack on IranEC holds Video-Conference with over 250 Observers of Phase 2 polls
 
CBDT clarifies rent from letting out of space with amenities in SEZ to be treated as business income

By TIOL News Service

NEW DELHI, APR 26, 2017: IN the latest clarification the CBDT has stated that in the case of an undertaking which develops, develops and operates or maintains and operates an industrial park/SEZ notified in accordance with the scheme framed and notified by the Government, the income from letting out of premises/ developed space along with other facilities in an industrial park/ SEZ is to be charged to tax under the head 'Profits and Gains of Business'. Accordingly, henceforth, appeals on the said issue may not be filed by the Department and those already filed may be withdrawn or not pressed upon.

The issue whether income arising from letting out of premises / developed space along with other amenities in an Industrial Park/SEZ is to be charged under head 'Profits and Gains of Business' or under the head 'Income from House Property' has been subject matter of litigation in recent years. Assessees claimed the letting out as business activity, the income arising from which to be charged to tax under the head 'Profits and Gains of Business', whereas the Assessing officers hold it to be chargeable under the head 'Income from House Property'.

The Board had considered the matter and observed that income from the Industrial Parks or SEZ established under various schemes framed and notified under section 80IA(4)(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (Act) is liable to be treated as income from business provided the conditions prescribed under the schemes are met. In the case of Velankani Information Systems Pvt Ltd, the Karnataka High Court observed that any other interpretation would defeat the object of section 80IA of the Act and government schemes for development of Industrial Parks in the country. SLPs filed in this case by the Department was dismissed by the Supreme Court.

In a subsequent judgement dated 30.04.2014 in ITA No.76 & 78/2012 in the case of CIT vs. Information Technology Park Ltd. 2014-TIOL-820-HC-KAR-IT, the Karnataka High Court has reaffirmed its earlier views. It has held that, since the assessee-company was engaged in the business of developing, operating and maintaining and Industrial Park and providing infrastructure facilities to different companies as its business, the lease rent received by the assessee from letting out buildings along with other amenities in a software technology park would be chargeable to tax under the head " Income from Business" and not under the head "Income from House Property". This judgement has been accepted by the Board.


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.




Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.