News Update

Jio turns world’s top telco in terms of data trafficIndia takes part in 'Institutionalization of SMART Government for Improving Service Delivery' in LondonGadkari faints during campaign; Heat takes toll on his health'Sunflowers were the first ones to know' - film by FTII student selected at CannesSARFAESI Act - Award of interest on auction money at rate applicable to fixed deposits is not a correct view and rate of interest deserves to be enhanced: SC (See 'TIOLCorplaws')ST - Chit Funds - Tax was not paid under mistake of law but upon demand by tax authorities - Refund not having been filed within time was rightly rejected: HCSC asks EC to submit more info on reliability of EVMsGST - Without considering reply on merits, proper officer has held that reply is unsatisfactory and, therefore, he is left with no alternative but to create demand - Order set aside: HCGST - Cancellation of registration retrospectively - Show Cause Notice and the impugned order are bereft of any details, accordingly the same cannot be sustained: HCGST - Registration could not have been cancelled retrospectively for the period for which returns were filed and taxpayer was compliant: HCGST - Notfn 11/2017-CTR amended by 03/2022 - Work contracts executed before 18 July 2022 - Petitioners should file refund claims before respondent agitating grievance and same be examined and orders passed within 4 months: HCItaly imposes USD 10 mn fine on Amazon for unfair business practicesGST - Entire tax liability has been realised by appropriating the amount from the petitioner's bank account, therefore, Revenue interest stands fully secured - Since tax proposal was confirmed without participation of petitioner, order set aside and matter remanded: HCCaste Census is my mission, says RahulRight to Sleep - A Legal lullabyUS warns Pak of punitive sanctions against trade deal with IranI-T- Income surrendered before approaching Settlement Commission not covered u/s 115BBE, where this provision did not exist during relevant AYs: HCChinese companies decry anti-subsidy probe by EUI-T- Entire interest expenditure is allowable as deduction if loan funds is not diverted for non-income earning activities/personal purposes : ITATUK to send military aid package worth USD 619 mn to UkraineUS regulator bans non-compete agreements by employeesAir India, Nippon Airways join hands for travel between India and JapanSC grills Baba Ramdev & Balkrishna in misleading ad case
 
Expenditure tax - Composite charges collected by hotel can be quantified only upon conclusion of stay of guests: HC

By TIOL News Service

CHENNAI, APRIL 26, 2017: THE issue is - Whether composite charges collected by a hotel can be quantified only upon conclusion of the stay of the guests, though a day to day account may have been maintained thereof. YES is the verdict.

Facts of the case:

The assessee is in the business of running Hotels. During the subject year, the returns of Expenditure Tax were filed and orders of Assessment in terms of Section 9(2) of Expenditure Tax Act 1987 were issued by the AO in respect of A.Ys 1995-96 and 1997-98 respectively. In the course of Assessment, the AO noted that the Assessee had offered to tax chargeable expenditure of an amount of Rs.31,35,18,224/- as against which a sum of Rs.3,28,82,659/- had been paid leaving a sum of Rs.26,02,331/- outstanding. A stand was taken by the assessee at the time of assessment to the effect that the outstanding amount represented expenditure that was yet to be 'incurred' by the guests who had stayed at the hotels and that, upon such incurrence by the guests and collection by the hotel, the same would be paid over to the Government. In advancing this argument, the Assessee interpreted the provisions of Section 5 that defines 'Chargeable Expenditure' to mean such expenditure incurred that had been paid by the guests and duly received by the hotel. The stand of the Assessee was rejected by the AO who was of the view that the mercantile system of accounting followed by the Assessee, necessitated all expenditure that had accrued, to be offered to tax. The AO was of the view that the Assessee was bound to pay tax on the entire expenditure, irrespective of whether the same had been collected from the customers. On appeal, the Tribunal was of the view that the incurrence of expenditure for the purpose of chargeability thereof, would arise as and when the amount due by the guests were quantified by the hotel and an invoice raised in that regard. The Tribunal observed that in the case of those guests that were in occupation of rooms/use of hotel services as on the closing day of the year, the incurrence of expenditure could not be quantified midstay and till the actual raising of the bill.

On appeal, the HC held that,

++ it is to be noted that Sub-section (1) of Section 5 addresses two situations, and refers to the 'incurrence of expenditure' or the 'payments made' in or to a hotel. The two references are akin to the mercantile and cash system of accounting respectively. There is no difficulty with respect to the second component, that is, payments actually made. The first component presents some scope for debate in so far as the expenditure can be incurred either on a day to day basis over the period of stay, which is the view of the Revenue, or upon conclusion of stay, at the time of check-out, which is the view of the assessee. The normal practice adopted by hotels in this regard would be of some relevance and bearing upon the issue. The expenditure incurred in a hotel is composite feature that takes into account the charges payable for accommodation, food, drink and other services that are offered along with the use of the room. Such composite charges can be quantified only upon conclusion of the stay of the guests though a day to day account may have been maintained thereof. We have noted earlier that the object of Section 5 r/w/s 3 would not extend to individual services provided at a hotel but a composite charge only. Thus, in a situation where at the close of the year a guest is still in occupation of a room in the hotel, the expenditure would not have been incurred and such event will only be triggered at the time of closure of stay by the guests in the hotel. In other words, it is the quantification of the expenditure at the time of raising of the composite bill that crystallizes and constitutes chargeable expenditure incurred for the levy of tax thereupon.

(See 2017-TIOL-797-HC-MAD-IT)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.