News Update

Delhi HC orders DGCA to deregister GO First’s aircraftIndia successfully tests SMART anti-submarine missile-assisted torpedo systemKiller heatwave kills hundreds of thousands of fish in Southern VietnamHong Kong struck by close to 1000 lightningColumbia Univ campus turns into ‘American Gaza’ - Pro-Palestinian students & counter-protesters clashViksit Bharat @2047: Taxes form the BedrockGST - April month collections go past Rs 2 lakh crore threshold - peak to Rs 2.1 lakh croreCX - Alleged clandestine removal - Not replying to SCN on the ground that letter is not furnished by department is only a ruse as reliance is not placed on the same by the respondent authority for adjudicating the SCNs: SCGST - Proper officer observes that the reply filed is not satisfactory and since the assessee has nothing more to say, demand is confirmed - Officer has not applied his mind - Matter remitted: HCGST - Petitioner had no opportunity to even object to the retrospective cancellation of registration - Petitioner does not seek to continue his business and has sought cancellation of registration - Order modified accordingly: HCGST - Seizing the outward movement of funds from petitioner's bank account - Life of an order of provisional attachment u/s 83(2) is only one year - HDFC Bank, henceforth, cannot restrain operation of bank account: HCTax - on Death and ContemplationDelhi, Noida schools receive bomb threats; Children sent back homeI-T- Writ court is not required to interfere with assessment order, where assessee also has available option of statutory appeal: HCED seizes Rs 90 Cr stored in crypto in Gaming App scamI-T-Transfer of assessment is sustained, where assessee does not reply to any notice issued in this regard & where valid reasons exist for transferring assessment: HCHM appeals Naxalism will be erased in 2 yrs if Modi voted back to powerAmerica softens offence related to use of marijuanaI-T - Rule 11UA does not mentions pre-condition of approval of balance sheet by Annual General Meeting: ITATAfter US & UK India comes third in terms of 79 mn cyber attacks in 2023: StudyCBIC revises tariff value of gold, silver & edible oils
 
Cus - Judicial Discipline demands that if Bench of Tribunal does not agree with decision of another Bench, correct course of action would have been to seek views of larger Bench: Supreme Court

By TIOL News Service

NEW DELHI, APRIL 13, 2017: THIS appeal arises out of the final order dated 29.10.2014 reported AS - 2015-TIOL-66-CESTAT-MUM passed by the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, West Zonal Bench, Mumbai.

The issue before the Tribunal was with regard to classification of Imaging Plates, IP Cassettes and FCR Capsula .

There was an order dated 20.02.2013 of the same Tribunal in the case of M/s. Jindal Photo India Pvt. Ltd. Reported in - 2013-TIOL-2200-CESTAT-MUM holding that Imaging Plates and IP Cassettes to be classifiable under Chapter 90 CTH 90189099 and, therefore, entitled to the benefit of notification No.21 /2002 dated 01.03.2002.

In the impugned order, the Tribunal did not accept the decision of the coordinate Bench in Jindal Photo India Pvt. Ltd. and took the view that the two items were more appropriately classifiable under Chapter 37 CTH 370110.

As benefit under the notification No.21 /2002-Cus dated 01.03.2002 was allowable in respect of Imaging Plates and IP Cassettes even if the same is to be classified under Chapter 37, the Tribunal, by the impugned order, held that the said two items will be eligible to the benefit of notification No.21 /2002 dated 01.03.2002.

The Supreme Court observed,

If the learned Tribunal was not in a position to accept the correctness of the decision of a coordinate Bench of the Tribunal, the correct course of action would have been to seek the views of a larger Bench. Judicial discipline demanded the quasi judicial authority i.e. the learned Tribunal to act in such a manner. That apart, the learned Tribunal seems to have found a case which was not even urged by any of the parties before it, namely, that Imaging Plates and IP Cassettes merit classification under Chapter 37.

The order of the Tribunal is set aside and the appeal is allowed by way of remand.

The Tribunal is requested to decide the matter as expeditiously as possible. All contentions available to the parties are left open.

(See 2017-TIOL-167-SC-CUS)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.