News Update

India, China hold fresh dialogue for complete disengagement on Western borders: MEAThakur says India is prepared for 2036 OlympicsCBDT substitutes Form in ITR-5EV Revolution: Lessons for India to learn from US and China!London court green-signals auction of luxury apartment of fugitive Nirav ModiGovt consults RBI; finalises borrowing plan for first half of FY 2024-25Gadkari says Farmers’ protest is politically-motivatedVP calls upon women entrepreneurs to be 'Vocal for Local'America offers USD 10 mn bounty for information on ‘Blackcat’ hackers after UnitedHealth gets hitI-T- The order of the ITSC can only be reopened in cases of fraud or misrepresentation: HC8 persons including Hezbollah militants killed in Israeli strike on LebanonI-T - Income so surrendered on account of investment in excess stock during course of survey cannot be brought to tax under deeming provisions of section 69B: ITATMacron pillories EU-South Africa trade deal; calls it ‘really bad’ in BrazilI-T-Power of revision need not be exercised where facts do not reveal any lack of enquiry by AO into relevant issue & when twin requirements of order being erroneous as well as prejudicial to Revenue's interests, are not satisfied: ITATThailand’s Lower House okays Bill to legitimise same-sex marriageI-T -Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) cannot be imposed where an assessee claims deduction u/s 80P while being ineligible therefor, but being under the bona fide impression of being eligible for such benefit : ITATYellen warns China against clean energy dumpingCus - Enhancement of declared value of imported goods is not tenable, where Department adduces no material to show how the enhanced value was computed & where no cogent rationale is made out for rejecting declared value: CESTATMilky Way’s central black hole - Twisted magnetic field observedCus - Assessee has not proved beyond reasonable doubt that goods in question imported under air way bills/bills of entry were in fact filed by him and hence the only natural corollary available to Revenue is confiscation of same: CESTATSmall investors help Trump Media’s valuation skyrocket to USD 13 billionST - When the facts are in the knowledge of department subsequent SCN alleging suppression cannot be issued and entire demand was found beyond normal period of limitation: CESTATFM Nirmala Sitharaman declines to contest LS elections as she has no fundsST - Tripura State Rifles not required to pay Service Tax under heading of Security Services, as it is is not engaged in business of providing security services: CESTATJustice Ritu Raj Awasthi joins as Judicial member of LokpalCX - Clandestine removal alleged based on consumption of raw inputs and heightened electricity usage - Tax demands based on third party statements but without permitting cross examination of deponents; case remanded to allow this exercise: CESTAT
 
ST - Providing armed security guards to PSU u/s 13 of Police Act, 1861, is carrying out of statutory function and not liable to service tax: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

NEW DELHI, MAR 22, 2017: THE DIG of Police is in appeal against the O-in-O passed by CCE, Bhopal whereunder demand of service tax of Rs.1,33,19,821/- along with equivalent penalty has been confirmed.

The brief facts are that the appellant is a part of MP State Police force. They have statutory responsibility for maintenance and enforcement of public law and order. They are also providing arms, security guards to public sector banks/undertakings and government departments under Section 13 of Police Act, 1861 on collection of actual expenditure/cost , which has been called as 'consideration' under the contract.

The issue is whether providing armed security guards to public sector banks / undertakings and govt. departments is to be covered under the definition of 'security services' and collection of charges for the same will be liable to service tax under the Finance Act, 1994.

CBEC vide Circular No. 89/7/2006-ST dated 18.12.2006 has clarified that wherever the charges collected by any sovereign public authority are for carrying out any statutory function, the same is not liable to levy of service tax if following three conditions are satisfied:

(a) Sovereign/public authorities perform duties which are in the nature of statutory and mandatory obligation to be fulfilled in accordance with the law.

(b) The fee collected should be levied as per the provision of relevant law.

(c) The amount collected is to be deposited into government treasury.

After considering the submissions made, the Bench observed -

+ We are of the view that the appellant is performing statutory duties and the amount so collected is being deposited in the govt. treasury.

+ It is on record that the appellant is depositing the money collected on account of the subject services in the govt. treasury. It is also on record that the appellant is performing statutory function which is one of the three conditions of the CBEC Circular dated 18.12.2006 and it has also been claimed that the collection of the fee levied by the appellant is as per the provisions of relevant law.

The impugned order was set aside and the appeal was allowed.

(See 2017-TIOL-940-CESTAT-DEL)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

AR not Afar by SK Rahman

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri Shailendra Kumar, Trustee, TIOL Trust, giving welcome speech at TIOL Awards 2023




Shri M C Joshi, Former Chairman, CBDT




Address by Shri Buggana Rajendranath, Hon'ble Finance Minister of Andhra Pradesh at TIOL Awards 2023