News Update

MPLADS fund to promote startups in IndiaCBDT issues transfer orders for 87 Pr CITs of Income Tax grade officersCBEC promotes 124 officers as DCsC2B Transactions - whether liable to GST under RCM?Cus - S.129E did not defeat or render vested right of appeal illusory - condition of pre-deposit is a reasonable condition: HCGoyal calls for adding value to mineral wealth of India20 yrs of ITA Agreement - Membership grows to 82 WTO MembersI-T - Cost of interest on borrowed funds used for acquiring capital asset, can be taken as cost of acquisition of asset: ITATCX - Penalty u/s 11AC would follow, as night follows day, only if, finding is returned that there was an escapement of duty due to conscious and deliberate wrongdoing on part of the Assessee: HCOpposition grows against 12% GST rate on sanitary napkinsGST - CBEC notifies deemed registration rules + substitutes 'provisional ID' by 'GSTIN'GST - Union Govt notifies Composition Scheme for NINE Special Category States + Also under UTGSTUnion Minister launches Digital MSME Scheme; gives away awardsEU slaps USD 2.7 billion penalty on Google for manipulating search resultsCBEC wants speedy clearance of office space for CGST CommissioneratesCBDT notifies format for furnishing Aadhaar details made mandatory from July 1, 2017Action Plan to boost up Cruise Tourism, a growth driver for India: GadkariGST - Some initial problems are bound to be there; Real Estate may be roped in under GST by next year, says FM25 Ministries to turn into e-office by June-end: MinisterGovt issues guidelines on GST RegistrationDownpour throws life out of gear in MumbaiIndia, USA to strengthen defence relations; Guardian drones cleared for IndiaBoard assigns proper officer for Registration and Composition levy under CGST, 2017100 Tweets FAQ released by BoardN-E to benefit from GST: Dr Jitendra SinghST - Respondents not providing service to trainees but to central/state government - classifiable under BAS and exempted under 14/2004-ST: CESTATI-T - Reopening cannot be instituted on basis of DVO's report showing unaccounted cost of construction incurred by previous proprietor, when assessee firm has never even existed: HCCus - DGFT notification is a law and not an executive instruction - merely submitting a declaration of end use is not sufficient : HCUS Supreme Court upholds Trump's temporary travel ban on travelers from six Islamic countries
 
CX - Cutting and slitting of aluminium foils of jumbo size into smaller size is not taxable: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, MAR 20, 2017: THE appellant sare engaged in the activity of cutting and slitting of aluminum foils of jumbo size into smaller size. They are also engaged in some printing activity on the said foils as well.

A notice was issued to the appellant demanding CE duty on the activity of cutting, slitting and printing of rolls. The demands were confirmed and in appeal, the Tribunal remanded the matter for a decision in the light of the apex court decisions in LML Ltd. and Kores India Ltd . 2004-TIOL-92-SC-CX.

In de novo proceedings, again the demands were confirmed and thus the matter is before the CESTAT for the second time.

The appellant submitted that the issue of cutting and slitting of jumbo rolls of aluminum foil into smaller size has been examined by the Apex Court in SR Tissues Pvt. Ltd. 2005-TIOL-101-SC-CX and it has been held that the said activity does not amount to manufacture; in the case of GTC Industries Ltd. the Bombay High Court has held that the activity of embossing and cutting to shape the duty paid aluminium foil does not result in a distinct marketable commodity and is not an excisable activity. It is further stated that activity of printing was miniscule and within the exemption limit as can be seen from the annexure to the show-cause notice.

The AR submitted that in the case of Kores India Ltd - 2004-TIOL-92-SC-CX the Apex Court has held that cutting and spooling of typewriters/telex ribbons amounting to manufacture. Reliance is also placed on the decision in Sanjay Industrial Corporation & Others - 2015-TIOL-17-SC-CX.

The Bench while distinguishing the decisions cited by the AR observed that the facts involved in both the cases were different. However, the decision of the Apex Court in the case of SR Tissues Pvt. Ltd. (supra) squarely covers the instant case, the Bench added.

The CESTAT further noted - If the cutting and slitting of aluminium foil into roll is not taxable then the activity of printing done by the appellants falls within the SSI exemption limit.

The appeal was allowed.

(See 2017-TIOL-895-CESTAT-MUM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS