News Update

Indian Coast Guard intercepts Pakistani boat with 86 kg drugs worth Rs 600 CroreGold watch of richest Titanic pax auctioned for USD 1.46 millionIraq is latest to criminalise same-sex marriage with max 15 yrs of jail-termUndersea quake of 6.5 magnitude strikes Java; No tsunami alert issuedZelensky says Russia shelling oil facilities to choke supply to Europe20 army men killed in blasts at army base in Cambodia3 Indian women from Gujarat died in mega SUV accident in USJNU switches to NET in place of entrance test for PhD admissionsGST - fake invoice - Patanjali served Rs 27 Cr demand noticeI-T - Bonafide claim of deduction by assessee which was accepted in first round of proceedings does not tantamount to furnishing of inaccurate particulars, simply because it was disallowed later: ITATIndia-bound oil tanker struck by Houthiā€™s missiles in Red SeaSCO Defence Ministers' Meeting endorses 'One Earth, One Family, One Future'RBI issues draft rules on digital lendingI-T - In order to invoke revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263, twin conditions of error in order and also prejudice to interest of Revenue must be established independently: ITATCRPF senior official served notice of dismissal on charges of sexual harassmentIndian Air Force ushers in Digital Transformation with DigiLocker IntegrationColumbia faculty blames leadership for police action against protestersCX - When process undertaken by assessee does not amount to manufacture, even then CENVAT credit is admissible if such inputs are cleared on payment of duty which would amount to reversal of credit availed: CESTATGoogle to inject USD 3 bn investment in data centre in IndianaCus - The equipments are teaching accessories which enable students in a class to respond to queries and these equipments are used along with ADP machine, same merits classification under CTH 8471 60 29: CESTATUN says clearing Gaza mounds of rubble to take 14 yrsST - When issue is of interpretation, appellant should not be fastened with demand for extended period, the demand confirmed for extended period is set aside: CESTAT
 
CX - Goods cleared for export but since bond expired, Dept. asked appellant to pay duty - refund is covered under rebate provisions, not maintainable: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, MAR 16, 2017: THE matter is listed before the CESTAT to decide the maintainability of the appeal.

The fact is that the goods were cleared under bond and the bond period had expired. On pointing out by the department, the duty was paid on the export clearances, thereafter, the refund was claimed. The appellant contends that in view of the above facts, the matter is a case of refund of duty and not a rebate claim.

The AR submitted that the goods were cleared though under bond but at the time of clearance there was no valid bond. Therefore, the export clearances were to be made on payment of duty under claim for rebate. Therefore, whatever duty was paid, the same is refundable under the rebate provisions as provided under Rule 18 of the CER, 2002. Inasmuch as since the case involving rebate of duty is excluded from appeal remedy before Tribunal as per provisions of Section 35B clause (b) of CEA, 1944, the present appeal is not maintainable.

After considering the submissions, the Bench observed –

"4. …We find that the goods were cleared though mentioning under bond but since the bond was expired, no bond was available, the goods has to be cleared on payment of duty under claim for rebate. Therefore, whatever duty was paid by the appellant and the same is refundable under rebate provisions under rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. Therefore, the present case is for rebate of duty paid on the export clearance, as provided under Section 35B (1)(b) of Central Excise Act, 1944, the case involving rebate of duty in respect of export clearance are excluded. Accordingly, the appeal in such case is not maintainable before this Tribunal whereas the remedy of revision application before the Joint Secretary, Revisionary Authority to Government of India is available to the assessee. It is also noticed that the appellant had already filed revision application before the appropriate authority. As per our above discussion, the appeal is not maintainable…"

In fine, the appeal was dismissed as non-maintainable.

(See 2017-TIOL-842-CESTAT-MUM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.