News Update

CLAT 2024 exams to be held on Dec 1NCGG commences Programme for officials of TanzaniaGST - Appellate Authority has not noticed the provisions of Section 12 of the Limitation Act, 1963 which mandates that the day on which the judgment complained of was pronounced, is also to be excluded: HCDefence Secretary commends BRO for playing major role in country's securityGST - If the Proper Officer was of the view that the reply filed was insufficient, he could have sought more clarification - Without providing any such opportunity, impugned order could not have been passed - Matter remanded: HCSC holds influencers, celebrities equally accountable for misleading adsGST - Notice requiring petitioner to furnish additional information/clarification does not mention that petitioner had to appear for personal hearing - Since no opportunity of personal hearing was given, order is unsustainable: HCIndian Naval ships arrive at Singapore; to head towards South China SeaGST - For the purposes of DNB and FNB courses, petitioner clearly falls within the scope of an educational institution imparting education to students enrolled with it as a part of a curriculum - Services exempted: HCIndia's MEDTECH industry holds immense potential: Dr Arunish ChawlaKejriwal’s judicial custody extended till May 20GST - Candidates appearing for the screening tests are not students of the petitioner - Petitioner's claim of exemption on such examination fees is unmerited: HCBrisk voting reported from all 96 LS seats; PM casts vote in AhmedabadGST - NEET examinations are in the nature of an entrance examination - Petitioner would be entitled to the benefit of an exemption by virtue of Serial No.66(aa) of the 2017 Notification, which came into effect on 25.01.2018: HCIndia calls back half of troops stationed at MaldivesIndia-Australia DTAA: Economic Statecraft through TaxRBI alerts against misuse of banking channels for facilitating illegal forex tradingTime Limit to file Appeal in GST Appellate TribunalEC censures Jagan Reddy & Chandrababu Naidu for MCC violationsFrance tells Xi Jinping EU needs protection from China’s cheap importsI-T- Addition cannot be made merely for reason that assessee got property transferred through registered sale without making payment to vendor: ITATI-T- Addition which is not based on the reasons for reopening is un-sustainable sans notice u/s 148 of the ACT: ITATOxygen valve malfunction delays launch of Boeing’s first crewed spacecraftFM administers Oath to Justice Sanjaya Kumar Mishra as first President of GST TribunalGhana agrees to activate UPI links in 6 monthsED seizes about 20 kg gold from locker of a cyber scammer in Haryana
 
I-T - No late fee u/s 234E can be levied for belated filing of TDS statements, if TDS returns were already filed & processed by CPC before June 01, 2015: ITAT

By TIOL News Service

VIZAG, MAR 08, 2017: THE issue is - Whether AO can levy late fee u/s 234E for belated filing of TDS statements u/s 200(3), if the TDS returns has been filed and processed by the Central Processing Unit before June 01, 2015. NO is the answer.

Facts of the case:

The assessee filed quarterly e-TDS returns in prescribed forms for the respective quarters in respect of tax deducted at source under various TDS provisions of the Act. These quarterly returns were filed belatedly after the due date specified u/s 200(3) of the Act and Rule 31A of the Income Tax Rules, 1962. These quarterly returns were processed by the TDS, CPC and intimation u/s 200A was issued demanding late filing fee payable u/s 234E. On appeal, the CIT(A) held that the provisions of section 234E being the machinery section are applicable for levy of late fee for belated filing of TDS statements even before insertion of sub-clause (c) in section 200A of the Act, by the Finance Act 2015, w.e.f. 1.6.2015.

On appeal, the ITAT held that,

++ there is no enabling provision in section 200A of the Act, before insertion of subclause (c) into section 200A of the Act, by the Finance Act, 2015 w.e.f. 1.6.2015 and hence, no adjustments can be made towards late fee payable u/s 234E of the Act, for belated filing of TDS statements u/s 200(3) of the Act, while issuing intimation u/s 200A of the Act, for processing TDS statements filed and processed for the assessment years prior to 1.6.2015. Admittedly all the TDS returns has been filed and processed by the TDS, CPC before 1.6.2015. Therefore, fee payable u/s 234E of the Act, cannot be levied while processing TDS statements u/s 200A of the Act. CIT(A), without appreciating the facts simply upheld the action of the A.O. in levying late fee u/s 234E of the Act. Hence, A.O. directed to delete additions made towards late fee u/s 234E of the Act.

(See 2017-TIOL-263-ITAT-VIZAG)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.