News Update

CBIC revises tariff value of edible oils, gold & silverFormer IPS officer Sanjiv Bhatt jailed for 20 yrs for planting drugs to frame lawyerCentre receives Rs 18.5 lakh crore tax revenue upto Feb monthUN says Households waste across world is now at least one billion meals a dayExpert Committee on developing GIFT IFSC as 'Global Finance and Accounting Hub' submits report to IFSCAIndia, China hold fresh dialogue for complete disengagement on Western borders: MEADefence Production issues notification for re-organisation of DGQAThakur says India is prepared for 2036 OlympicsCBDT substitutes Form in ITR-5EV Revolution: Lessons for India to learn from US and China!London court green-signals auction of luxury apartment of fugitive Nirav ModiGovt consults RBI; finalises borrowing plan for first half of FY 2024-25Gadkari says Farmers’ protest is politically-motivatedVP calls upon women entrepreneurs to be 'Vocal for Local'America offers USD 10 mn bounty for information on ‘Blackcat’ hackers after UnitedHealth gets hitI-T- The order of the ITSC can only be reopened in cases of fraud or misrepresentation: HC8 persons including Hezbollah militants killed in Israeli strike on LebanonMacron pillories EU-South Africa trade deal; calls it ‘really bad’ in BrazilThailand’s Lower House okays Bill to legitimise same-sex marriageYellen warns China against clean energy dumpingMilky Way’s central black hole - Twisted magnetic field observedCus - Assessee has not proved beyond reasonable doubt that goods in question imported under air way bills/bills of entry were in fact filed by him and hence the only natural corollary available to Revenue is confiscation of same: CESTATSmall investors help Trump Media’s valuation skyrocket to USD 13 billionJustice Ritu Raj Awasthi joins as Judicial member of Lokpal
 
CX - Even if small part of process is carried out with help of pedal operated machine, garments will remain as handicrafts – Benefit of notfn. 76/86-CE available: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, FEB 24, 2017: THE appellants are engaged in the manufacture of readymade garments [Ch. 62.01]. They surrendered their Central Excise Registration certification on 09.03.2004 stating that all their products were classifiable as handicraft and, therefore, they were exempted under Notification No. 76/1986-CE dated 10.2.1986.

Subsequently, appellant's premises was visited by the CE officers and stock of readymade garments valued at Rs.51,93,000/- was seized under the reasonable belief that the same cannot be categorized as handicrafts.

Inasmuch as per the statement of the Partner of the appellant, it was revealed that embroidery was done on the goods with the help of machine run on motor .

SCN came to be issued demanding CE duty by denying the exemption claimed and the same was confirmed by the lower authorities.

Before the CESTAT, the appellant submitted that major part of the garments such as embroidery, hand painting, crocheting, ornamentation etc. was done manually and only occasionally pedal operated machine was utilized during the process of manufacture; therefore, even if a small part of the process is carried out with the help of pedal operated machine, the garments will remain as handicrafts. Reliance is placed on the Circular No. 773/6/2004 dated 28.1.2004 and the decision of the Tribunal on an identical issue in Vira Enterprises - Order No. A/85089-85091/17/EB dated 01.09.2016. The appellant also drew support from the apex court decision in Louis Shoppe 2002-TIOL-126-SC-CX. Moreover, the Central Excise Registration was surrendered under bona fide belief that their product is covered under exemption Notification No. 76/1986 as handicrafts and, therefore, suppression of facts cannot be alleged.

The Bench considered the submissions and observed –

++ As per the statement of the appellant, occasionally the pedal operated machines were used, however, the hand process such as, embroidery, painting, crocheting and ornamentation was done. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Louis Shoppe (supra) has held that even if some machine is used in the process, the goods would still be treated as handicraft and that handmade readymade garments would be treated as handicraft and accordingly eligible for exemption under Notification No. 76/86.

++ We have gone through the Board's Circular No. 773/6/2004 -CX dated 28.1.2004, wherein it was clarified that classifying the goods as handicraft one or more the process such as hand painting or hand printing or handicrafts Tie and Dye or handicrafts Batik, embroidered or crocheted ornamentation, appliqué work of sequins, glass or wooden beads, shells, mirrors or Ornamental motifs of textiles and other materials, extra warp/wept ornamentation of cotton, silk, zari (metal thread in Gold /Silver/ wool or any other fibre yarn are carried out. In the facts of the present case, except the part of the embroidery process, which was carried through pedal operated machine, most of the processes such as painting/ornamentation was done manually. Hence the goods is correctly classifiable as handicrafts.

Extracting and relying upon the decision of the Tribunal in the case of Vira Enterprises , the Bench concluded that the captioned product in which even if a small part of the process was carried out by the machine, the garments would still fall under the category of handicrafts and product in question is entitled for the exemption under Notification No. 76/86-CE.

The impugned order was set aside and the appeals were allowed.

(See 2017-TIOL-580-CESTAT-MUM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

AR not Afar by SK Rahman

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri Shailendra Kumar, Trustee, TIOL Trust, giving welcome speech at TIOL Awards 2023




Shri M C Joshi, Former Chairman, CBDT




Address by Shri Buggana Rajendranath, Hon'ble Finance Minister of Andhra Pradesh at TIOL Awards 2023