News Update

Call drops - Problem is mostly indoors, says DoTACES fails again; CBEC feels compelled to extend ST Return filing date to April 30PM reviews performance of key infrastructure sectorsCX/CUS/ST - To prefer an appeal before Tribunal, appellant needs to deposit 10% of amount of duty/penalty irrespective of amounts equivalent to 7.5% deposited by them before Commr.(A): LBFM clarifies Union Govt has no plan to levy income tax on agri incomeST - If contention of department is accepted that appellant cannot be treated as service provider then payment made should not be treated as that of service tax but as reversal of CENVAT credit availed - Appeals allowed: CESTATSwachh Bharat Bug Finally Catches Up With CBDTCBDT clarifies rent from letting out of space with amenities in SEZ to be treated as business incomeGujarat goes for massive bureaucratic reshuffle - 45 IAS officers transferredHigh Seas Sales in GST RegimeExpenditure tax - Composite charges collected by hotel can be quantified only upon conclusion of stay of guests: HCCus Appellants were bonafide transferee of DEPB scrip with no involvement in the forgery or fraud before DGFT no penalty imposable ROM allowed: CESTATST Maintenance of software cannot be taxed under 'Management, maintenance or repair service' prior to 01.06.2007: CESTATPension Regulator makes it online for retirement advisersCBI nabs several Plant Quarantine officials + CHAs & Shipping Agents in corruption casee-PRAN card launched for Atal Pension YojanaSitharaman to inaugurate Spices Farmers Producer CompaniesCyber Crime - INTERPOL detects 9000 C2 servers; websites infected with malware codeRental income from space equipped with ameniteis in SEZ to be treated as business incomeCBDT prescribes method for valuation of FMV of assets owned by Trusts / InstitutionsGovt eases PF rules to allow withdrawal for house purchaseIf Govt grants waiver of loan to farmers, it may cost 2% of GDP: Arvind SubramanianCX - Exemption - Sec 11C Notification - Court cannot direct Government to grant exemption - No violation of Article 14: SCGST Network to provide standard software for small tradersClearance of Gift and Personal Use parcels imported through Courier modeST - Tribunal ordering appellant to pay further sum is bereft of any rationale as substantial part of demand stood deposited: HCI-T - Special limitation imposed on EOU for claiming deductions, by way of insertion of Sec 80A(5) and Fourth proviso to Sec 10B(1), is not violative of Constitution of India: HCCX - Activity of assembling various computer components into working system not manufacture: CESTATMinto Road Govt Press to be 'reborn' at cost of Rs 339 Crore
 
CX -Tanker is not bulk pack, therefore, activity of unloading edible oil and converting into retail pack and labeling is not manufacture: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, FEB 17, 2017: THE case of the Department is that the activity of conversion of edible oil from tanker to retail pack and labeling amounts to manufacture u/s 2(f) of CEA, 1944 and accordingly, the repacked refined edible oil is liable to duty.

In appeal before the CESTAT, the appellant submitted that the issue is no more in dispute as in the appellant's own case decided by the Tribunal vide Order No. A/90742/16/EB dated 01.09.2016, it has been held that repacking of RBDP almolein Oil received in tanker in bulk and repacking them into smaller packs does not amount to manufacture. Reliance is also placed on the decisions in Anwar Oils - 2015-TIOL-2837-CESTAT-MUM, Amritlal Chemaux Ltd. - 2015-TIOL-130-SC-CX, Ammonia Supply Co. - 2011-TIOL-1400-CESTAT-MUM, Ruchi Health Foods Ltd. - 2006-TIOL-1948-CESTAT-MAD.

The AR submitted that the demand of duty has been correctly raised and confirmed in view of Chapter Note 4 to Chapter 15 of the CETA, 1985, which reads -

"4. In relation to products of sub-heading Nos. 1502.00, 1503.00, 1504.00 and 1508.90, labeling or relabeling of containers and packing from bulk packs to retails packs or the adoption of any other treatment to render the product marketable to consumer, shall amount to manufacture."

On the Chapter note referred by the AR, the Bench observed -

+ From the chapter note, it is seen that if the goods are repacked from bulk pack to retail packs and also labeled then the activity shall amount to manufacture.

+ In the facts of the present case, the edible oil received in the tanker was unloaded and then converted into retail pack and labeled. As per the judgments relied upon by the appellant, it has been consistently held that the conversion of the product from tanker to retail pack is not conversion of bulk packs to retail packs because the tanker in which goods are received is not bulk pack, therefore, one limb of the Chapter Note that packing from bulk pack to retail pack does not satisfy.

+ Though there is an activity of labeling but as per the Chapter Note 4 prevailing at the relevant time, the activity of repacking from bulk pack to retail pack and also labeling, both should be carried out in order to hold manufacture under Note 4 to the Chapter 15.

+ There is no activity of repacking from bulk packs to retail packs and only labeling alone is carried out, therefore, the activity does not amount to manufacture.

The impugned order was set aside and the appeals were allowed.

In passing: Interestingly, in the matter of the stay application filed by the appellant, the Bench had ordered a pre-deposit of Rs.1 lakh. See - 2006-TIOL-658-CESTAT-MUM

(See 2017-TIOL-499-CESTAT-MUM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS