News Update

Indigenous Technology Cruise Missile successfully flight-tested by DRDO off the Odisha coastUS imposes fresh sanctions against Iranian drone productionIREDA's GIFT City office to boost Green Hydrogen and Renewable Energy Manufacturing ProjectsVoting for General Elections 2024 commences tomorrowGlobal warming up to 3 degrees to cost 10% of global GDP: StudyNexus between Election Manifesto and Budget 2024 in July!Clearing the Air: Airtel's SC Decision provides clarity on test of AgencyGST implications for Corporate Debtor under IBCI-T- Petitioner's CIBIL score lowered due to same PAN being issued to another assessee who defaulted on loan; I-T Deptt to inform CIBIL of remedial measures taken: HCBrazil’s proposal to tax super-rich globally finds many takers in G20 GroupI-T- Additions framed on account of unconfirmed cash loans upheld in part, where assessee is unable to discharge onus of proving source of cash deposits : ITATCPM manifesto promising annihilation of all weapons of mass destructions including nuclear, draws flak from Defence MinisterI-T- Registration of trust u/s 12A denied due to inadvertent error by assessee in filing Form 10AB but with wrong selection code; case remanded for reconsideration: ITATBiden favours higher steel tariff on ‘cheating’ China + may up tariff on dominant solar tech suppliersI-T- Enhancement of income is not sustainable if CIT (A) not follow sec 251 and no notice given to assessee of enhancement : ITATUS Poll: Biden trumps Trump in money race by USD 75 mnI-T- Assessee is entitled for depreciation on goodwill arising out of difference between cost of acquisition and net value of assets and liabilities as per book value of CAPL : ITATNetanyahu says Israel to decide how and when to respond to Iran’s aggressionI-T- There is no scope of extrapolation in search assessment based solely on assumptions and surmises in absence of any tangible material qua the relevant assessment year: ITATGoogle slays costs by laying off staffers & shifting roles outside USI-T- Re-assessment cannot be sustained where based on borrowed satisfaction & where conducted in a mechanical manner: ITATHeavy downpours drown Dubai; Airport issues travel advisoryCus - There cannot be an exercise of jurisdiction to injunct invocation of BG, as it is a settled principle of law that bank guarantee constitutes an independent contract between the bank and the party in whose favour BG is furnished: HCHM pledges to make India completely Maoist-freeGST - Except for holding that the taxpayer had availed ITC which is blocked credit u/s 17(5), no reasons are specified - Order set aside and matter remanded: HCMicrosoft to inject USD 1.5 bn in AI Group G42 of UAEGST - Injustice would be caused unless petitioner is provided another opportunity to contest tax demand on merits - Subject to deposit of 10% of demand, matter is remanded: HCCanadian budget proposes more taxes on higher income groups & tax credits for EVsWorld leaders appeal for quick ratification of UN Ocean Treaty
 
CBEC officers & other employees associations call for judicial scrutiny of cross-empowerment under IGST

By TIOL News Service

NEW DELHI, JAN 27, 2017: THE members of IRS Association, members of Supdts. Association, members of Inspector's Association and members of Ministerial Officer's Association of Central Excise held a joint meeting yesterday and resolved:

++ to emphasize that 'Strong CBEC - Strong G.S.T - Successful GST - Strong India.'

++ to work jointly for successful implementation of GST and betterment of career prospects.

++ the decision of dividing assessees and cross empowerment of IGST should face judicial scrutiny.

++ reiterates it's commitment for successful roll out of Goods & Services Tax (GST) in the country and for achieving the objective of: One Nation, One Tax & One Market. Officers of our service have made significant contribution to the GST process and continue to do the same. However, the decision dt. 16-01-2017 has caused widespread anguish and discontent in whole of central indirect tax administration consisting of Group A, B and C officers.

++ a decision has also been taken for cross empowerment under IGST. All the service members are highly disappointed and feeling cheated over the decision apparently taken under state officers' associations' pressure. The biggest tax reform of the century should have been in conformity with the principles of responsibility and authority going together and also in conformity with the constitutional design. The decision shall weaken the centre's ability to ensure its revenues. The decision will not only adversely affect the career of revenue officers but it is not in national interest. The Centre should review the inappropriate and incorrect decision.

++ The Centre's power to levy and collect any kind of duty within the territorial waters of the Country should be exclusive domain of centre and collection being the exclusive domain of CBEC. Accordingly, the State should not be given any power to levy and collect tax within the territorial waters. The area in sea (territorial waters) upto 12 nautical miles from the Coastline falls within the territory of India. As per the Constitutional provisions this area in territorial waters is not included in the territory of any State of India. The High Seas transaction are already subject to Customs clearances and other duties of Customs are levied in lieu of Excise and VAT then why State should tax such transactions again when Customs would already impose IGST. It would only give rise to harassment of EXIM trade. Therefore, the powers to tax transactions in the territorial waters upto 12 nautical miles should vest with the Union Government. Therefore the rights to collect IGST and CGST either in the boundary of the States or area in territorial waters upto 12 nautical miles from Coastline should constitutionally vest with the Centre, and should be exercised by CBEC officers only.

++ IGST is a destination based tax. Whatever IGST is collected will be going to the destination state. Under IGST Act, based on place of supply rules the supplier will be paying IGST to Government. If State governments are cross empowered to collect IGST, it will be the origin state which will collect IGST. Audit and Detailed Scrutiny of such IGST transactions will be done by origin state for taxes due to destination state. Again what incentive is there for State Govt officers to spend time in audit and detailed scrutiny of IGST transactions which don't generate any revenue for them. Cross empowering State Govts. will lead to complications about jurisdictions when state disputes whether something is inter-state transactions or not. In present proposal, CBEC officers will be the final authority to resolve the same. It is easier said than done. Trade will suffer delays / uncertainty in the whole handing off from state to central government officers which is detrimental to business. As per the constitution only government of India is empowered to levy and collect IGST. Accordingly we strongly opposes this move of weakening of centre by transferring of rights or allowing levy and collection of IGST to States.

++ Administrative structure should also take note of parity issues with regard to officers selected through UPSC and State PSCs, and amicably position them in administration hierarchy. Moreover Supdts., Inspectors and Ministerial Cadre suitably be placed on proper parity.

++ No Customs Day Celebration on 27th January at any place;

++ observe Black Day by wearing Black Badges on 30th January on Martyrs day.


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.




Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.