News Update

CBIC revises tariff value of edible oils, gold & silverFormer IPS officer Sanjiv Bhatt jailed for 20 yrs for planting drugs to frame lawyerCentre receives Rs 18.5 lakh crore tax revenue upto Feb monthUN says Households waste across world is now at least one billion meals a dayExpert Committee on developing GIFT IFSC as 'Global Finance and Accounting Hub' submits report to IFSCAIndia, China hold fresh dialogue for complete disengagement on Western borders: MEADefence Production issues notification for re-organisation of DGQAThakur says India is prepared for 2036 OlympicsCBDT substitutes Form in ITR-5EV Revolution: Lessons for India to learn from US and China!London court green-signals auction of luxury apartment of fugitive Nirav ModiGovt consults RBI; finalises borrowing plan for first half of FY 2024-25Gadkari says Farmers’ protest is politically-motivatedVP calls upon women entrepreneurs to be 'Vocal for Local'America offers USD 10 mn bounty for information on ‘Blackcat’ hackers after UnitedHealth gets hitI-T- The order of the ITSC can only be reopened in cases of fraud or misrepresentation: HC8 persons including Hezbollah militants killed in Israeli strike on LebanonMacron pillories EU-South Africa trade deal; calls it ‘really bad’ in BrazilThailand’s Lower House okays Bill to legitimise same-sex marriageYellen warns China against clean energy dumpingMilky Way’s central black hole - Twisted magnetic field observedCus - Assessee has not proved beyond reasonable doubt that goods in question imported under air way bills/bills of entry were in fact filed by him and hence the only natural corollary available to Revenue is confiscation of same: CESTATSmall investors help Trump Media’s valuation skyrocket to USD 13 billionJustice Ritu Raj Awasthi joins as Judicial member of Lokpal
 
CX - Mentioning part number on Air shaft/Air chucks and brand 'TIDLAND' on letterhead, invoices and catalogues does not amount to use of 'brand name' so as to be held ineligible for benefit of SSI exemption notification: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, JAN 23, 2017: THE appellant Assessee manufactures 'air shaft' and 'air chucks' under exclusive licence to manufacture and sell these products under arrangement with M/s Tidland Corporation, USA who, along with M/s Kohli Converting Machines Pvt. Ltd., are equal shareholders in the registered company.

Goods manufactured by assessee are sold to 'original equipment manufacturer's (OEMs) or buyers of equipment who require replacements, as these are tailor-made for the OEMs. The appellant had been availing benefits of SSI exemption under notification(s) 8/1998-CE, 8/1999-CE, 8/2000-CE, 8/2001-CE, 8/2002 and 8/2003-CE.

On the ground that the assessee has been using an ineligible brand on the products cleared by them, the benefit of SSI exemption was sought to be denied for the period March 1999 to September 2003.

The demand of CE duty of Rs.28,34,832/- was confirmed by the CCE along with imposition of an equivalent penalty on the assessee and also a penalty of Rs.3 lakhs on the Director.

Before the CESTAT, the appellant submitted that the brand 'TIDLAND' was not affixed on any of the products cleared by them and that the name was to be found only on letterheads, clearance invoices and catalogues which is not a restriction in the said notifications. The plea of the demand being hit by limitation is also taken by the appellant.

The Bench adverted to the conclusion by the adjudicating authority that for custom-made products, mere printing of brand name on document is sufficient to deny eligibility under the notifications and that the use of the 'part number' on the finished product is intended to establish the origin of the product and remarked that these conclusions do not appear to have any basis in the content of statutory instrument whose application has been denied by the impugned order.

Inasmuch as they appeared to be philosophical musings on the nature and purpose of the restriction in the exemption notifications without a forthright conclusion to the effect that this interpretation must, unerringly, lead to denial of exemption, the CESTAT added.

Coming down heavily on the reliance placed on the contents of the 'support' menu in the website of the overseas collaborator and the inferences drawn there from, the CESTAT observed -

"6. These, undoubtedly, are admirable sentiments and could well be a manifesto for action in particular context. As background note for a strategic recommendation, it may well be deserving of encomiums. However, adjudicating of tax disputes are intolerant of such intellectual forays and, most often, recall us to the path of strict adherence where an exemption notification is the cause of action. We are, therefore, compelled to swerve from the enjoyable perusal of a literary ramble and return to the uncompromising legalese of the exemption notification."

After extracting paragraph 4 of the SSI notification(s) and referring to the decision in Otto Blitz (India) Pvt. Ltd. - 2015-TIOL-217-SC-CX, the Bench further observed -

++ It is amply clear that it is the goods that must be affixed with the ineligible brand name for the exclusion to take effect. There is no allegation that this is so.

++ It would not be in accord with the intent of the notification if the part/serial number were to be considered as 'brand name' as the definition of "brand name" cannot, by any stretch, be intended to encompass what, at best, can be described as an aid to manufacture or assembly.

++ We also take note that the agreement confers exclusive rights to the appellant-assessee to use the 'trademark' and, from this, it would appear that the impugned mark is no longer that of the overseas collaborator for the purpose of the specified territory but is that of the appellant-assessee.

The impugned order was set aside and the appeals were allowed.

(See 2017-TIOL-201-CESTAT-MUM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

AR not Afar by SK Rahman

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri Shailendra Kumar, Trustee, TIOL Trust, giving welcome speech at TIOL Awards 2023




Shri M C Joshi, Former Chairman, CBDT




Address by Shri Buggana Rajendranath, Hon'ble Finance Minister of Andhra Pradesh at TIOL Awards 2023