News Update

Cus - When there is nothing on record to show that appellant had connived with other three persons to import AA batteries under the guise of declaring goods as Calcium Carbonate, penalty imposed on appellant are set aside: HCCongress fields Rahul Gandhi from Rae Bareli and Kishori Lal Sharma from AmethiCus - The penalty imposed on assessee was set aside by Tribunal against which revenue is in appeal is far below the threshold limit fixed under Notification issued by CBDT, thus on the ground of monetary policy, revenue cannot proceed with this appeal: HCGST -Since both the SCNs and orders pertain to same tax period raising identical demand by two different officers of same jurisdiction, proceedings on SCNs are clubbed and shall be re-adjudicated by one proper officer: HCFormer Jharkhand HC Chief Justice, Justice Sanjaya Kumar Mishra appointed as President of GST TribunalSale of building constructed on leasehold land - GST implicationI-T - If assessee is not charging VAT paid on purchase of goods & services to its P&L account i.e., not claiming it as expenditure, there is no requirement to treat refund of such VAT as income: ITATBengal Governor restricts entry of State FM and local police into Raj BhawanI-T - Interest received u/s 28 of Land Acquisition Act 1894 awarded by Court is capital receipt being integral part of enhanced compensation and is exempt u/s 10(37): ITATCops flatten camps of protesting students at Columbia UnivI-T - No additions are permitted on account of bogus purchases, if evidence submitted on purchase going into export and further details provided of sellers remaining uncontroverted: ITATTurkey stops all trades with Israel over GazaI-T- Provisions of Section 56(2)(vii)(a) cannot be invoked, where a necessary condition of the money received without consideration by assessee, has not been fulfilled: ITATGirl students advised by Pak college to keep away from political eventsI-T- As per settled position in law, cooperative housing society can claim deduction u/s 80P, if interest is earned on deposit of own funds in nationalised banks: ITATApple reports lower revenue despite good start of the yearI-T- Since difference in valuation is minor, considering specific exclusion provision benefit is granted to assessee : ITATHome-grown tech of thermal camera transferred to IndustryI-T - Presumption u/s 292C would apply only to person proceeded u/s 153A and not for assessee u/s 153C: ITATECI asks parties to cease registering voters for beneficiary-oriented schemes under guise of surveys
 
CX - 'Dummy' fan cleared for display at depot is no different from normal electric fan which are sold by valuing u/s 4A - no exemption under SWAM Act from affixing RSP - goods rightly valued u/s 4A: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, JAN 10, 2017: THE appellant is engaged in the manufacture and sale of electric fans through their depots. Valuation of these goods is done in terms of Section4A of CEA, 1944.

The appellants had also cleared some numbers of fans to their depots describing it as "dummy fans" in their invoice.

The department was of the view that the fans being a "dummy" fan, the valuation thereof should be in terms of Section 4 and not Section 4A of CEA, 1944.

A differential duty demand was confirmed by the adjudicating authority and the said order was upheld by the Commissioner (Appeals),leading to the present appeal.

The appellant submitted that the "dummy fans" were cleared for being displayed at the depots and after some time the same are sold in the same manner as other fans. Inasmuch as except the terminology "dummy" mentioned in the invoices, nature of the goods sold does not get altered. Therefore, the so-called "dummy" fans were rightly valued in terms of section 4A of CEA, 1944.

The AR reiterated the findings of the impugned order and submitted that since the dummy fans are not fans that are sold in the market in normal course, therefore, the valuation under Section 4A will not apply.

The Bench observed -

"4. …We find that the Revenue could not bring any material on records which shows that the electric fan cleared by the appellant to their depots by pre-fixing description 'dummy' fan is different from the normal electric fan which are valued under Section 4A. Further as per the submission of the appellant the "dummy" terms was given to certain quantity of fans only to give identity that same is for display purpose. However the same is subsequently sold in the same manner as other fans are sold. Therefore, as far as the manner of transaction of other fans and dummy fans there is no difference. We also find that there is no exemption under the Legal Metrology Act from affixing the retail sale price on such clearance. Therefore in our considered view, there is no reason why the electric fan cleared by appellant by prefixing dummy should be given different treatment for valuing under Section 4. In our considered view, the electric fans in question are also liable to be valued under Section 4A of Central Excise Act, 1944…"

The impugned order was set aside and the appeal was allowed.

(See 2017-TIOL-81-CESTAT-MUM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.