News Update

India received foreign remittance of USD 111 bn in 2022, says UNPitroda resigns as Chairman of Indian Overseas Congress over racist remarkGovt hosts workshop on improving Ease of Doing Business in Mining sectorI-T - Anything made taxable by rule-making authority u/s 17(2)(viii) should be 'perquisite' in form of 'fringe benefits or amenity': SCCus - Drawback - Revenue contends that appeal of exporter ought to have been dismissed by Tribunal as not maintainable since correct remedy was filing a revision application with Central government - Appeal disposed of: HCCus - CHA - AA has clearly brought out the modus adopted by the appellant and how he was a party to the entire under valuation exercise - Factual finding affirmed by Tribunal - No question of law arises for consideration: HCGST - Proper officer has not applied his mind while passing the order; confirmed demand by opining that reply is not satisfactory - Proper Officer is directed to withdraw all punitive actions taken against petitioner pursuant to impugned order: HCGST - Proper Officer had to at least consider the reply on merits and then form an opinion - Non-application of mind - Order set aside and matter remitted for re-adjudication: HCGST - Cancellation of registration for non-filing of returns - Suspension/revocation of license would be counterproductive and works against the interest of revenue - Pragmatic view needs to be taken to permit petitioner to carry on his business: HC86 flights of AI Express cancelled as crew goes on mass sick leaveTax Refund Conundrum - Odyssey of Legal MisstepsI-T- AO not barred from issuing more than one SCN; Fresh SCN seeking information is not without jurisdiction, more so where HC itself directed re-doing of assessment: HCMurthy launches Capacity Building on Design and Entrepreneurship programCash, liquor & drugs worth Rs 110 Cr seized from Jharkhand ahead of pollsI-T- Appeal before CIT(A) (NFAC) is rightly dismissed where it has been delayed by over one year without just & reasonable cause: ITATPoll-induced stress: 2 Bihar officials die of heart attack at polling boothsSixth Edition of Commandants' Conclave held in PuneSome Gujarat villages keep away from polls over unfulfilled demands from governmentRoof-hugging inflation nudges Argentina to print first lot of 10,000 notes of pesoInvestigation finds presence of ‘boys club’ strands of culture at American bank regulatorUS cancels licence to some firms found exporting materials to Huawei
 
I-T - Whether compensation & interest awarded to an assessee in pursuance of acquisition of his land for public purposes under provisions of Land Acquisition Act, can be subjected to Income Tax - NO: HC

By TIOL News Service

AHEMDABAD, DEC 20, 2016: THE ISSUE IS - Whether compensation & interest awarded to an assessee in pursuence of acquisition of his land for public purposes under the provisions of Land Acquisition Act, can be subjected to Income Tax. NO IS THE VERDICT.

Facts of the case:

The assessee, in pursuence to an award passed by the Reference Court, Junagadh, was held to be entitled to a sum of Rs. 92,56,980/- towards additional compensation and a sum of Rs. 3,06,39,391/- towards interest on the additional amount of compensation. While disposing of the said amount by the Reference Court, the District Development Officer (DDO) ie., the acquiring body, deducted Rs. 10,48,885/- towards TDS, Surcharge and Education Cess under the Income-tax Act, in respect of an amount of additional compensation of Rs. 92,56,980/- as well as deducted a further sum of Rs. 34,71,442/- towards TDS, surcharge and cess under the I-T Act in respect of the total amount of interest ie., Rs. 3,06,39,391/- and the DDO deposited the aforesaid amount ie., Rs. 45,20,257/- to the office of the ITO. Accordingly, the assessee challenged the action of DDO in illegally deducting and depositing an amount of Rs. 45,20,257/= towards TDS from the total amount of compensation and interest.

On appeal, the HC held that,

++ It is noted that the land of assessee was acquired for public purpose and he received compensation of Rs. 92,56,980/-, being additional amount of additional compensation and Rs. 3,06,39,391/- towards interest under the provisions of Land Acquisition Act, the assessee was not liable to pay any tax on the aforesaid amount received by him. Once on the aforesaid amounts, the petitioner was not liable to pay tax and/or the aforesaid sum of amount was not subject to tax, there was no question of deducting any tax at source. Therefore, in view of the case of Movaliya Bhikhubhai Balabhai v. ITO, the impugned action of the DDO in deducting and depositing a sum of Rs. 45,20,257/- towards TDS on the amount of compensation and interest received thereon pursuant to judgment and award of the Land Acquisition Reference is hereby quashed and set-aside. The DDO is hereby directed to deposit the said amount with the Reference Court within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the present order, which shall thereafter disburse such amount to the assessee.

(See 2016-TIOL-3056-HC-AHM-IT)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.