News Update

India received foreign remittance of USD 111 bn in 2022, says UNPitroda resigns as Chairman of Indian Overseas Congress over racist remarkGovt hosts workshop on improving Ease of Doing Business in Mining sectorI-T - Anything made taxable by rule-making authority u/s 17(2)(viii) should be 'perquisite' in form of 'fringe benefits or amenity': SCCus - Drawback - Revenue contends that appeal of exporter ought to have been dismissed by Tribunal as not maintainable since correct remedy was filing a revision application with Central government - Appeal disposed of: HCCus - CHA - AA has clearly brought out the modus adopted by the appellant and how he was a party to the entire under valuation exercise - Factual finding affirmed by Tribunal - No question of law arises for consideration: HCGST - Proper officer has not applied his mind while passing the order; confirmed demand by opining that reply is not satisfactory - Proper Officer is directed to withdraw all punitive actions taken against petitioner pursuant to impugned order: HCGST - Proper Officer had to at least consider the reply on merits and then form an opinion - Non-application of mind - Order set aside and matter remitted for re-adjudication: HCGST - Cancellation of registration for non-filing of returns - Suspension/revocation of license would be counterproductive and works against the interest of revenue - Pragmatic view needs to be taken to permit petitioner to carry on his business: HC86 flights of AI Express cancelled as crew goes on mass sick leaveTax Refund Conundrum - Odyssey of Legal MisstepsI-T- AO not barred from issuing more than one SCN; Fresh SCN seeking information is not without jurisdiction, more so where HC itself directed re-doing of assessment: HCMurthy launches Capacity Building on Design and Entrepreneurship programCash, liquor & drugs worth Rs 110 Cr seized from Jharkhand ahead of pollsI-T- Appeal before CIT(A) (NFAC) is rightly dismissed where it has been delayed by over one year without just & reasonable cause: ITATPoll-induced stress: 2 Bihar officials die of heart attack at polling boothsSixth Edition of Commandants' Conclave held in PuneSome Gujarat villages keep away from polls over unfulfilled demands from governmentRoof-hugging inflation nudges Argentina to print first lot of 10,000 notes of pesoInvestigation finds presence of ‘boys club’ strands of culture at American bank regulatorUS cancels licence to some firms found exporting materials to Huawei
 
Central Excise - Appeal to Commissioner (Appeals) - Limitation to be counted from date of corrigendum: HC

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, DEC 14, 2016: APPEALS in Central Excise, Customs and Service Tax are to be filed with the Commissioner (Appeals) within sixty days from the date of the communication of the decision or order of the lower authority and the Commissioner (Appeals) can extend it by another thirty days. If no appeal is filed within this extended period pf 90 days, the Commissioner (Appeals) has no power to condone the delay.

In the instant writ before the High Court, the Commissioner (Appeals) had dismissed the appeal on the ground that the same is not filed within limitation and the Commissioner has no power to condone the delay. But the catch here is - there was a corrigendum to the Order In Original.

The order in original was passed on 31.10.2012 and the appeal was filed on 27.02.2013. After the order was passed on 31.10.2012, some mistake in the order was noticed. Corrigendum was issued on 31.12.2012 for correcting the amount of penalty.

The High Court observed,

Naturally the appeal period will have to be computed from the corrected date of the order as that is the order that would be executable. The said aspect is also considered by the Division Bench of Jharkhand High Court in the case of Fast Track Tour and Travels Vs. Union of India, wherein it is held that the limitation would be counted from the date of corrigendum.

There cannot be any dispute with the proposition that the Commissioner (Apples) does not have any power to condone the delay beyond 30 days. However, if the Corrigendum is considered, then naturally the appeal would be within limitation.

Considering the above, the impugned order is quashed and set aside. The commissioner (Appeals) shall consider the appeal filed by the petitioner on merits.

(See 2016-TIOL-3002-HC-MUM-CX)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.