News Update

Musk defers India’s trip citing heavy Tesla obligationsIndia needs to design legislative pills to euthanise tax-induced expatriation!I-T- Exercise of jurisdiction u/s 263 is invalid if AO has taken particular view, which though, may not be only view, but certainly can be possible view : ITATTorrential rains cause havoc in Pakistan; 87 killedI-T- Additions framed on account of unexplained money upheld as assessee was unable to prove source of cash deposited in assessee's bank account : ITATUS imposes sanctions on 3 Chinese firms and one from Belarus for transfering missile tech to PakistanCX - Appellant has regularly filed statutory returns on monthly basis and the fact of clearance of goods and availment of credit was duly reflected in returns but same has not been examined by authorities below, impugned order is not sustainable: CESTATDubai terribly water-logged as it has no storm drainsST - When services are received from separate source & accounted separately in separate ledgers, there cannot be any question of clubbing them under one category: CESTATEU online content rules tightened against adult content firmsCus - The continuous suspension of license of Customs Broker without either conducting an inquiry or issuing a notice for revocation of license or imposition of penalty is bad in law and needs to be set aside: CESTATEV market cools off in US; Ford, GM eyeing gas-powered trucksApple China tosses out WhatsApp & Threads from App store after being orderedChina announces launch of new military cyber corpsRailways operates record number of additional Trains in Summer Season 2024GST - Assessing officer took into account the evidence placed on record and drew conclusions - Bench is, therefore, of the view that petitioner should present a statutory appeal: HC1st phase polling - Close to 60% voter turnout recordedMinistry of Law to organise Conference on Criminal Justice System tomorrowGST - To effectively contest the demand and provide an opportunity to petitioner to place all relevant documents, matter remanded but by protecting revenue interest: HCGovt appoints New Directors for 6 IITsNexus between Election Manifesto and Budget 2024 in July!Israel launches missile attack on IranEC holds Video-Conference with over 250 Observers of Phase 2 polls
 
Government dispels concerns over taxation of jewellery

DECEMBER 05, 2016

By Saraswathi Kasturirangan & Vijay Bharech

ERRANT taxpayers have been provided another opportunity to come clean via the Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan Yojana, 2016(PMGKY). This scheme envisages the disclosure of income in the form of deposits with specified entities during the period to be notified with taxes and penalty amounting to around 50%. The scheme also mandates the deposit of 25% of such undisclosed income in a 4 year interest free deposit scheme.

Continuing its crusade against black money, the Government has also proposed to enhance the applicable taxrate on unexplained credits/investments/money/expenditure, etc. from 30%to 60%. With an increased surcharge of 25% on such tax and 3% education cess, the total tax would amount to 77.25%. Where such income is not offered in the tax return and is determined by tax authorities, an additional penalty at 10% of taxes due (i.e. 6% of undisclosed income) would be levied bringing the total to 83.25% of undisclosed income. Detection based on search would attract significantly high penaltiesviz30% of undisclosed income where the income is admitted, returned and taxes are paid during search and 60% in other circumstances.

A snapshot of the various scenarios is provided below

Scenario

Implication

Comments

Disclose under PMGKY

Tax and penalty cost – 50%

Mandatory deposit of 25% of undisclosed income in 4 year interest free deposits

Disclosure only in respect of deposits made with specified entities viz RBI, Schedule banks etc.

Disclosure of assets such as Bullion, Jewellery etc not possible under this route.

Disclose as part of 2016-17 tax return

Tax cost – 77.25%

No penalty applicable

Disclosure of income invested in non-cash assets may be possible only under this route.

Not disclosed by taxpayer, but determined by tax authorities

Tax cost – 77.25%

Penalty – 6%

Applicable to non-search cases e.g. determination during scrutiny assessment

Determined by tax officer during search

Tax cost – 77.25 %

Penalty – 30% -60%

Would also cover jewellery and bullion purchased out of undisclosed income / income where the source cannot be substantiated and detected during search

Disclosure under the PMGKY scheme is only available in respect of cash deposited with specified entities. Undisclosed investments in other forms such as bullion, jewellery etc are not covered. Presumably, this has led to a speculation that all jewellery held would be subject to increased taxes and penalties. In order to dispel such concerns, the Government has clarified that no new provision has been introduced regarding taxability of jewellery.

The clarification emphasizes that jewellery/gold purchased out of disclosed or exempted income (e.g. agricultural income, reasonable household savings) or that which is legally inherited is not chargeable to tax. The enhanced tax rates and stringent penalties are applicable only to unexplained credits/investments/money/expenditure, etc. The intention is to severely penalise tax evaders who attempt to pass off their undisclosed income as business income or income from other sources in the return of income and this is detected by the tax officer.

The Government has also clarified that during searches no seizure of jewellery and ornaments shall be made to the extent of 500 grams per married lady, 250 grams per unmarried lady and 100 grams per male member of the family. It is important to note that this is merely a reiteration of existing instructions which have been prevalent since 1994. The instructions also provide an authority to the authorised officer to exclude a larger quantity of jewellery and ornaments from seizure based on the family status and the custom and practices of the community to which the family belongs. Such exclusions need to be reported to the Director of Income-tax/Commissioner authorising the search at the time of furnishing the search report. Further, a detailed inventory of the jewellery and ornaments found must be prepared to be used for assessment purposes in all cases of search.

With effect from FY 2015-16, individuals with taxable income exceeding Rs 50 lakhs are required to disclose specified assets and liabilities, including jewellery held as on 31 March 2016 as part of the tax return.  Till 2014-15, jewellery was subject to wealth tax and a wealth tax return was required to be filed by individuals owning wealth beyond the prescribed thresholds . Individuals having complied with these requirements should have no concerns. Individuals owning jewellery and other assets which have been purchased out of disclosed income have nothing to worry as legitimate holding of jewellery up to any extent is fully protected.

Where the jewellery is purchased out of undisclosed income, the tax officer may impose stringent penalties during search and seizure, which may range from 30 to 60 percent, over and above the tax rate of 77.25%.

Taxpayers who are able to substantiate legitimate source of income for the cash deposits made or jewellery and other assets held will not be impacted.

Other taxpayers are encouraged to voluntarily disclose income either via the PMGKY or through the tax returns to come clean and pay taxes.

(Ms. Saraswathi Kasturirangan is Partner; and Mr. Vijay Bharech is Manager with Deloitte Haskins and Sells LLP and the views expressed are strictly personal.)

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the sites)

POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.




Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.