News Update

WTO Meet in Buenos Aires - India hopeful of support on food security issueOver 15 mn girls aged between 15 to 19 experienced forced sex: UNICEFCentre to take a view on blending of methanol in petrol soon: GadkariCBDT issues refunds worth over Rs one lakh crore by Nov-endDRI nabs 3 persons with demonetised notes worth Rs 49 CroreIndia's fish production goes up to 11.4 mn tonneIncome tax collections reach Rs 4.8 lakh crore, 49% of target, by Nov-endUN observes International Anti-Corruption Day on Dec 9India needs to build institutional arbitration mechanism to woo investment: CJIGujarat Polls - 68% voting recorded in first phase, says Dy ECExport of software & ITes Services - UK alone accounts for total exports to Europe: RBICBEC Board approves song 'GST ka Swagatam' composed by JC Hemant Kumar TantiaGovt notifies IBBI Grievance & Complaint Handling Regulations, 2017 (See '')EU, Japan finalise legal text to create largest free trade zoneJNPT logs 5.7% growth in container handlingEPF Scheme has now presence in 461 districts: GangwarGovt decides to take over Unitech Management; NCLT clears move to appoint 10 New DirectorsUK, EU thrash out scheme for BrexitSmart reuse and wastewater projects - 33 cities issue tendersTDS - Premium paid by tourist operator, seperately to RMCs for purchase of foreign currency, cannot be treated as commission payment requiring TDS deduction u/s 194H: ITATCX - 'Acetyl Salicylic Acid Tablets IP 50 MG (ASA)' is not a brand name but generic name, therefore, it does not fall under the definition of P & P medicament: CESTATCustoms - CBEC further eases guidelines for taking surety or securityGSTR 6: GSTN activates functionality for ISD ReturnE-Courts Project milestones reviewed; E-Filing facility for district courts launchedGST - Law Review Committee to examine recommendations of Advisory Group on Law ReviewStates, UTs pass Resolution for Future Roadmap to reform Power SectorCBDT suspends DCIT for allegedly harassing taxpayerCBDT Chairman not happy with 'Run Rate'CBDT extends due date for linking Aadhaar with PAN to March 31, 2018Govt to link about 140 services to Aadhaar; Deadline for linking to be extended to March 31, 2017CBEC notifies new Customs exchange ratesGSTN activates functionality to Revise TRAN-1Pre-Budget Meet - Industry seeks MAT exemption on write-back of notional income from IBC Plan
Invoke Cooperative Federalism to Check Tax Uncertainty

DECEMBER 02, 2016

By TIOL Edit Team

INDIA'S growing tax revenue uncertainty is cause for deep worry for three major reasons – 1) Demonetization 2) Its dark shadow over introduction of long-delayed Goods and Service Tax (GST) on 1st April 2017 & 3) Adverse impact of Centre's unilateral macro-economic decisions on State finances.

Amidst the growing Tsunami of reduced GDP estimates worked by different entities post demonetization, one conclusion is unmistakable: Both Central and State tax revenues would get dented due to cash shortage-driven slump in demand & economic activities.

The spurt in payment of pending tax dues such as property tax with demonetized Rs. 500 & 1000 notes created irrational exuberance among demonetization votaries. This trend would peter out by December-end.

As it is, decline in VAT receipts in certain States has rattled revenue authorities. Telangana has tentatively projected demonetization-triggered reduction in its tax receipts at Rs. 3,000 crore for the balance period of 2016-17. It is monitoring tax collections on daily basis.

Kerala says it is struggling to fund its expenditure on various activities. It has reportedly suffered revenue loss of more than Rs. 2,000 crore, which is expected to increase in the next four months.

Uttarakhand has formed a high-level committee to study impact of demonetization on its tax receipts. Its Chief Minister Harish Rawat has already written a letter to Union Finance Minister Arun Jaitley, seeking help to tide over the impact of demonentisation on tourism, agriculture and overall tax receipts.

Mr. Rawat reportedly wrote: "Demonetisation is weighing heavy on a state already battling the losses caused by the recommendations of the 14th Finance Commission."

Karnataka too has raised concern over tax revenue uncertainty. The final stamp on States' concern on this count has been emphatically delivered by Amit Mitra, West Bengal Finance Minister and Chairman of Empowered Committee of State Finance Ministers.

In an interview to a TV channel, he reportedly stated that post-demonetization, GST has become a "double whammy" for states. Mr. Mitra said he would consult his counterparts in other States to reconsider GST roll-out timing.

Mr. Mitra pointed out that states are losing more money post demonetization, which is expected to reduce GDP growth by 2%. Noting that all leading economist have disapproved demonetization, he said: "The government needs to redo its arithmetic."

Yes, every stakeholder in the economy right from daily wage earner to mighty MNCs and all-mighty Union Government are already assessing the impact of demonetization.

The Union Government ought to be more transparent and pragmatic in taking into confidence not only States but the entire nation on its strategy to minimize the impact on economy.

The Union Finance Ministry should get into damage-control mode. And the first step it should take in this regard is to set up a joint Committee of Centre and States to assess all revenue losses. The Committee should recommend measures to cushion the impact of demonetization on different sectors, central and State schemes and the public.

The Committee should also suggest the quantum of Central compensation for revenue loss suffered by each State Government. It should also work out revised date for GST roll-out. The Centre must realize that introduction of GST in economy disrupted by severe cash crunch is fraught with grave risks.

The Centre should realize that it has already pushed weaker States to the brink of financial crisis by unilaterally implementing award of Pay Commission, whose formation has been repeatedly opposed by Finance Commission.

Ideally, the Centre should provide grants or soft loans to the States to enable them to implement wage hike for their respective staff keeping in view Pay Commission award as they have done in the past.

It is here pertinent to recollect that NDA-I/Vajpayee Government constituted in 2002 a committee under the Chairmanship of Union Finance Minister to assess the impact of pay revision on States' finances and make suitable recommendations. It took this step "in the spirit of cooperative federalism," as it stated in Parliament at that time.

The sooner the Centre constitutes a Committee to study the impact of demonetization and Pay Commission award on States, the better it is for tax certainty including minimizing delay in launch of GST. Reduction of tax uncertainty in particular and economic uncertainty in general would also improve investment climate.

It is high time the union ministers confine political rhetoric over benefits of demonetization to electoral arena and concentrate on minimizing its negative effects on the economy.

As put by National Institute of Public Finance and Policy (NIPFP), "The demonetisation undertaken by the government is a large shock to the economy. The impact of the shock in the medium term is a function of how much of the currency will be replaced at the end of the replacement process and the extent to which currency in circulation is extinguished."

In a Working Paper captioned 'Demonetisation: Impact on the Economy' issued on 14th November, NIPFP concludes: "While it has been argued that the cash that would be extinguished would be 'black money' and hence, should be rightfully extinguished to set right the perverse incentive structure in the economy, this argument is based on impressions rather than on facts. While the facts are not available to anybody, it would be foolhardy to argue that this is the only possibility."