News Update

Govt scraps ban on export of onionFormer Delhi Congress chief Arvinder Singh Lovely joins BJP with three moreUS Nurse convicted of killing 17 patients - 700 yrs of jail-term awardedGST - Payment of pre-deposit through Form GST DRC-03 instead of the prescribed Form APL-01 - Petitioner attributes it to technical glitches - Respondent is the proper authority to decide the question of fact: HC2nd Session of India-Nigeria Joint Trade Committee held in AbujaGST - Since SCN is bereft of any details and suffers from infirmities that go to the root of the cause, SCN is quashed and set aside: HC1717 candidates to contest elections in phase 4 of Lok Sabha ElectionsGST - Once Appellate Authority comes to the conclusion that SCN was issued by an officer who was not competent; reply was also considered by an incompetent authority and the Competent Authority had not applied its independent mind, Appellate Authority could not have assumed original jurisdiction and proceeded further with the matter: HC7th India-Indonesia Joint Defence Cooperation Committee meeting held in New DelhiGST - Neither the Show Cause Notice nor the order spell out the reasons for retrospective cancellation of registration, therefore, the same cannot be sustained: HCMining sector registers record production in FY 2023-24GST - If the proper officer was of the view that the reply is unclear and unsatisfactory, he could have sought further details by providing such opportunity - Having failed to do so, order cannot be sustained - Matter remanded: HCAnother quake of 6.0 magnitude rocks Philippines; No damage reported so farI-T - Initial burden of proof rested on assessee to substantiate his claim of having incurred expenditure on improvement of property: ITATTrade ban: Israel hits back against Turkey with counter-measuresI-T - Agricultural income can be treated by ITO as undisclosed income in absence of any substantial / corroborative material to prove same: ITATCanada arrests three persons in alleged killing of Sikh separatistI-T - Income from sale of property has to be classified & characterised only in manner of computation as per section 45(2): ITATCus - When there is nothing on record to show that appellant had connived with other three persons to import AA batteries under the guise of declaring goods as Calcium Carbonate, penalty imposed on appellant are set aside: HCCongress fields Rahul Gandhi from Rae Bareli and Kishori Lal Sharma from AmethiGST -Since both the SCNs and orders pertain to same tax period raising identical demand by two different officers of same jurisdiction, proceedings on SCNs are clubbed and shall be re-adjudicated by one proper officer: HCFormer Jharkhand HC Chief Justice, Justice Sanjaya Kumar Mishra appointed as President of GST TribunalSale of building constructed on leasehold land - GST implicationI-T - Interest received u/s 28 of Land Acquisition Act 1894 awarded by Court is capital receipt being integral part of enhanced compensation and is exempt u/s 10(37): ITATGirl students advised by Pak college to keep away from political events
 
I-T - Whether disallowance can be made u/s 40(a)(ia) for non deduction of TDS on reimbursement of expenses, merely on the basis that the payments were routed through associate company - NO: HC

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, NOV 03, 2016: THE ISSUE IS - Whether disallowance can be made u/s 40(a)(ia) for non deduction of TDS on reimbursement of expenses, merely on the basis that the payments were routed through associate company. NO IS THE VERDICT.

Facts of the case:

The assessee is a company. During the year, assessee paid a sum of Rs.4.59 crores to its holding company M/s. IDFC Ltd. on account of reimbursement of expenses. During the assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer disallowed the entire amount of Rs.4.59 crores paid to its holding company as reimbursement of various expenses on account of its failure to deduct tax at source. This disallowance was made by the AO in terms of Section 40(a) (ia). On appeal, CIT(A) partly allowed assessee's appeal, restricting the disallowance to Rs.3.40 crores u/s 40(a)(ia). This after holding that the amount of Rs.1.19 cores has already been disallowed by AO as prior period expenses. Therefore, it could not again be subject of disallowance. On further appeal, Tribunal noted that the fact that it was neither disputed by the AO or by CIT(A) that the amount paid by assessee to its holding company was towards reimbursement of expenses incurred by holding company. Thus, Tribunal allowed the appeal of assessee holding that there was no requirement of deducting TDS in case of reimbursement of expenses.

High Court's holding:

1. It is found that the impugned order of the Tribunal records the fact that the AO as well as CIT(A) have not disputed the position that the amount paid to the holding company by the assessee was towards reimbursement of expenses. At the hearing, the Revenue also has not shown any submission to the contrary being made before the Tribunal or any observation in the orders of the Assessing Officer and/or the CIT(A) to the contrary.

2. In the above view, on facts, it is an undisputed position that the amount paid to the holding company was towards the reimbursement of expenses. It is also not disputed by Revenue's counsel that it is settled position in law in view of the decision of this Court in Siemens AG that a party is not obliged to deduct tax at source on reimbursement of expenses. Therefore, question as raised does not give rise to any substantial question of law.

(See 2016-TIOL-2699-HC-MUM-IT)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.