News Update

Govt scraps ban on export of onionFormer Delhi Congress chief Arvinder Singh Lovely joins BJP with three moreUS Nurse convicted of killing 17 patients - 700 yrs of jail-term awardedGST - Payment of pre-deposit through Form GST DRC-03 instead of the prescribed Form APL-01 - Petitioner attributes it to technical glitches - Respondent is the proper authority to decide the question of fact: HC2nd Session of India-Nigeria Joint Trade Committee held in AbujaGST - Since SCN is bereft of any details and suffers from infirmities that go to the root of the cause, SCN is quashed and set aside: HC1717 candidates to contest elections in phase 4 of Lok Sabha ElectionsGST - Once Appellate Authority comes to the conclusion that SCN was issued by an officer who was not competent; reply was also considered by an incompetent authority and the Competent Authority had not applied its independent mind, Appellate Authority could not have assumed original jurisdiction and proceeded further with the matter: HC7th India-Indonesia Joint Defence Cooperation Committee meeting held in New DelhiGST - Neither the Show Cause Notice nor the order spell out the reasons for retrospective cancellation of registration, therefore, the same cannot be sustained: HCMining sector registers record production in FY 2023-24GST - If the proper officer was of the view that the reply is unclear and unsatisfactory, he could have sought further details by providing such opportunity - Having failed to do so, order cannot be sustained - Matter remanded: HCAnother quake of 6.0 magnitude rocks Philippines; No damage reported so farI-T - Initial burden of proof rested on assessee to substantiate his claim of having incurred expenditure on improvement of property: ITATTrade ban: Israel hits back against Turkey with counter-measuresI-T - Agricultural income can be treated by ITO as undisclosed income in absence of any substantial / corroborative material to prove same: ITATCanada arrests three persons in alleged killing of Sikh separatistI-T - Income from sale of property has to be classified & characterised only in manner of computation as per section 45(2): ITATCus - When there is nothing on record to show that appellant had connived with other three persons to import AA batteries under the guise of declaring goods as Calcium Carbonate, penalty imposed on appellant are set aside: HCCongress fields Rahul Gandhi from Rae Bareli and Kishori Lal Sharma from AmethiGST -Since both the SCNs and orders pertain to same tax period raising identical demand by two different officers of same jurisdiction, proceedings on SCNs are clubbed and shall be re-adjudicated by one proper officer: HCFormer Jharkhand HC Chief Justice, Justice Sanjaya Kumar Mishra appointed as President of GST TribunalSale of building constructed on leasehold land - GST implicationI-T - Interest received u/s 28 of Land Acquisition Act 1894 awarded by Court is capital receipt being integral part of enhanced compensation and is exempt u/s 10(37): ITATGirl students advised by Pak college to keep away from political events
 
Exemption from Ed Cess and SHE cess on clean energy cess under Notifications No 28/2010 CE and No.29/2010 CE cannot be made applicable to excise duty imposed on coal - Demand of Ed Cess and SHE Cess upheld: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

HYDERABAD, NOV 03, 2016: THE appellant is engaged in the mining and sale of coal. The Appellant has obtained Registration under the Clean Energy Cess Rules, 2010 with effect from July 01, 2010 and has been discharging Clean Energy Cess at the rate of Rs. 50/- per metric ton on the removal of Coal from their mine.

The Central Government issued Notification No. 28/2010-CE dated June 22, 2010 and Notification No. 29/2010-CE dated June 22, 2010 granting exemption from payment of Education Cess and Secondary and Higher Education Cess (hereinafter referred to S.H.E Cess) respectively to goods on which Clean Energy Cess is leviable - as specified in the Tenth Schedule of the Finance Act, 2010, which, inter alia includes Coal.

Coal was attracting Nil rate of duty upto Feb, 2011 in the First Schedule to CETA, 1985 with effect from March 01, 2011 the Finance Act, 2011 introduced Excise Duty on Coal, where under the manufacturer was granted an option of discharging Excise Duty either at the rate of 1% provided CENVAT credit of inputs, input services and capital goods used for production of coal is not availed or5% with the facility of CENVAT credit. The Appellant opted to remove Coal on payment of 5% Excise Duty.

On introduction of Excise Duty, the Appellant was advised that Education Cess and Secondary and Higher Education Cess is not payable on removal of Coal in view of the exemption granted under Notification No. 28/2010-CE dated June 22, 2010 and Notification No. 29/2010-CE dated June 22, 2010.The department issued show cause notices proposing to recover Education Cess and Secondary and Higher Education Cess on the quantity of Coal removed during periods under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 along with applicable interest and penalty.On adjudication the lower authority confirmed the proposals in the notices along with interest. Hence these appeals.

The appellant contended that the exemption under Notification No. 28/2010-CE dated June 22, 2010 and Notification No. 29/2010-CE dated June 22, 2010 is applicable not only to clean energy cess, but also to excise duty levied under the First Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985.

After hearing both sides, the Tribunal upheld the demand by holding inter alia that:

+ Section 83(5) of Finance Act, 2010 clearly lays down that Clean Energy Cess shall be in addition to any Cess or Duty leviable on the goods specified in the Tenth Schedule or under any other law for the time being in force, which shows that Clean Energy Cess is only one of the duties of Excise leviable on coal, limited to the said Tenth Schedule. Hence, an exemption from E. Cess and S.H.E. Cess on Clean Energy Cess does not mean exemption from E. Cess and S.H.E. Cess on Central Excise Duty. Since the Basic Excise Duty on coal was introduced only w.e.f 2011, it is incongruous that a notification issued in 2010 can exempt E. Cess and S.H.E. Cess on Basic Excise Duty, because E. Cess and S.H.E. Cess has to be calculated on the aggregate of Central Excise Duty.

+ It is also noted that vide the Finance Bill, 2015 which subsequently was passed in Parliament and received the assent of the President, inter alia, Education Cess and Secondary & Higher Education Cess leviable on all excisable goods were fully exempted. However, the Government, with the approval of the legislature, considered it necessary to issue separate notifications for rescinding the 2010 notification which exempted Clean Energy Cess from E. Cess and S.H.E. Cess. The very fact that the Government found it necessary to issue a separate Notification No. 17/2015-CE to rescind erstwhile Notification No. 28 and 29/2010-CE vindicates the conclusion that the impugned exemption from E. Cess and S.H.E. Cess was initially available only to Clean Energy Cess, w.e.f. 22.06.2010, and that E. Cess and S.H.E. Cess was very much imposable on Central Excise Duty till the amending Notification 14 & 15/2015-CE dated 01.03.2015.

+ Even the CBEC had clarified vide Circular 354/42/2014-TRU 22ndSeptember, 2015 that the exemption from Education Cess and S.H.E. Cess under Notifications No. 28/2010-CE and 29/2010-CE both dated 22.06.2010 (prior to 01.03.2015), is applicable only in respect of Clean Energy Cess leviable on Coal under Tenth schedule to Finance Act, 2010, hence Education Cess and S.H.E. Cess shall be leviable on Excise Duty on Coal.

+ The above discussions will put the final nail on the argument that exemption of E. Cess and S.H.E. Cess vide Notifications No.28/2010-Central Excise and No. 29/2010-Central Excise, both dated 22nd June, 2010, also meant that the Notification simultaneously exempted E. Cess and S.H.E. Cess on duty of excise. If this was the case, there would have been no need for the Government to issue, after four years, Notification No.15/2015-Central Excise dated 1stMarch, 2015 specifically exempting duty of excise from E. Cess and S.H.E. Cess, on all excisable goods. Only because all excisable goods now stood exempted from E. Cess and S.H.E. Cess w.e.f 1st March 2015, there arose the necessity for the Government to issue Notification No.17/2015-Central Excise dated 1stMarch, 2015 rescinding Notifications No. 28/2010-Central Excise and No. 29/2010-Central Excise, which had already exempted the levy of Education Cess and Secondary & Higher Education Cess on the Clean Energy Cess leviable on coal much earlier on 22nd June, 2010.

+ In view of foregoing discussions, there is no difficulty in concluding that exemption from E. Cess and S.H.E. Cess under Notifications No. 28 and 29/2010 both dated 22.06.2010 is applicable only with respect to Clean Energy Cess levied under the Finance Act, 2010, but will not be applicable with respect to Central Excise duty levied on coal w.e.f 01.03.2011. The issue is answered in favor of Revenue. The appeals are dismissed.

(See 2016-TIOL-2858-CESTAT-HYD)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.