News Update

I-T- Denial of deduction u/s 80IC can create perception of genuine hardship, where claimant paid tax in excess of what was due; order denying deduction merits re-consideration: HCIsrael launches missile attack on IranEC holds Video-Conference with over 250 Observers of Phase 2 pollsGermany disfavours Brazil’s proposal to tax super-richI-T- If material found during search are not incriminating in nature AO can not made any addition u/s 153A in respect of unabated assessment: ITATGovt appoints Dinesh Tripathi as New Navy ChiefAFMS, IIT Kanpur to develop tech to address health problems of soldiersFBI sirens against Chinese hackers eyeing US infrastructureI-T - Interest earned on short term deposit out of borrowed funds during period prior to commencement of business, is totally foreign to business objects of assessee, and not eligible for set off: ITATKenya’s top military commanders perish in copter crashCBIC notifies Customs exchange rates w.e.f. April 19, 2024Meta shares ‘Most Intelligent’ AI assistant built on Llama modelST - Service Tax paid in respect of export of services and cannot be subject to levy of Service Tax under Notfn 18/2009-ST, denial of exemption on procedural lapses cannot be sustained: CESTATDengue cases soaring in US - Close to ‘Emergency situation’: UN AgencyNexus between Election Manifesto and Budget 2024 in July!Half of China’s major cities sinking, reveals StudyCX - The warranty service is eligible for credit though the same is provided after clearance of final products: CESTAT
 
ST - Sum charged by club to members for sale of items is not taxable if evidences like sale bills and P&L evidencing such sale are available: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, OCT 27, 2016: THIS is a Revenue appeal directed against the order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) wherein the demand of Rs.5,44,098/- in respect of catering services was upheld but the demand of Rs.35,11,614/- in respect of sale of liquor was set aside.

The Adjudicating authority had confirmed the demand on the ground that the appellant had not produced any documentary evidence to prove that there is sale of liquor in terms of para 10.5 of Board Circular B-1/6/2005-TRU dated 27/07/2005 which reads -

 

 

10.5 Taxable services are defined as services provided to members by clubs or associations in relation to provision of services, facilities or advantages for a subscription or any other amount. Facilities or advantages are provided to members in return for a subscription or other consideration. The scope of the term any other amount is the amount paid by members, apart from membership fee or recurring subscription fee, such as amounts paid for provisions of services to the guests of a member, amount paid for get-togethers and functions charged over and above the subscription amount. This will also be liable to service tax. However, amount charged by club to its members for sale of items such as food or beverages would not be taxable provided the documents evidencing such sale are available.

As mentioned, Revenue is unhappy with the dropping of demand to the extent of Rs.35,11,614/- and, therefore, is before the CESTAT.

The AR while reiterating the grounds of appeal submitted that ample opportunities were given to the appellant for producing the documentary evidences to establish the sale of liquor but since the same was not forth coming the demand was rightly confirmed by the original authority and the same ought to have been maintained by the Commissioner(A).

None represented the respondent despite notice.

The CESTAT extracted the findings from the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) and concluded thus -

"…From the above findings of the ld. Commissioner (Appeals), I observe that for dropping demand the Commissioner (Appeals) has considered sufficient evidences such as sale bills, balance sheet, CA certificate and VAT statements submitted to the Sales Tax Department, therefore, I am of the view that Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) has applied his mind rightly in dropping demand after establishing that there is sale of liquor and no service tax can be demanded on such sale…."

Holding that there is no infirmity in the impugned order, the same was upheld and the Revenue appeal was dismissed.

(See 2016-TIOL-2790-CESTAT-MUM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.




Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.