News Update

Attack on Delhi Chief Secretary turning into street fights & legal battlesDAE Health Scheme notified for Sec 80D benefitsIssuance of Certificate of origin retroactively - period enhanced to twelve months from the date of shipment - Customs Tariff (Determination of Origin of Goods under the Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement between the Republic of India and Japan) Rules, 2011 amendedSummons in GST (See 'JEST GST on GST Home Page')I-T - When Revenue had accepted assessee as investor in previous year, it cannot change his status to trader merely because he made some profit on shares: ITATEmployee Benefits - An OverviewST - Transport of goods by air Tax payable during period 10.09.2004 to 16.09.2004 and 16.6.2005 to 14.07.2005 as there was no exemption from payment of such tax during said period: CESTATComposition scheme eligibility, process and benefitsCX - There is no provision under CCR, 2004 for denial of credit on ground that assessee has admittedly deployed inputs in excess of ideal for achieving desired output level: CESTATIAS Association condemns attack on Delhi Chief Secretary; demands immediate actionICAI removes name of O P Tulsyan from register of Members for five years in compliance with Allahabad HC orderST - Supreme Court agrees with Larger Bench CESTAT decision in Bhayana Builders - Revenue appeals dismissedCabinet clears bills on illicit deposit & chit funds regulations (See 'TIOLCorplaws')Cabinet nod for Tribunal on river disputeCabinet nod for bus bay near Indian Defence UniversityCabinet nod for coal mining methodologyCabinet okays Indo-Moroccan railway pactFive IRS officers appointed as CESTAT Members - Sanjiv Srivastava (Mumbai) + P Anjani Kr (Mumbai) + P Venkata Subba Rao (Hyderabad) + Bijay Kr (Delhi) + C L Mahar (Delhi)CBDT issues transfer order of four CITsI-T - Incriminating evidences obtained prior to date of search, cannot be roped in to make additions in case of unabated assessments: ITATPNB scam should pave road for financial transparencyBurdensome registration requirement under GST law be done away withST World Bank and International Finance Corporation are part of United Nations, therefore, there is no need to resort to definition of International Organization for extending benefit of notification 16/2002-ST: CESTATAnti Profiteering Application - An analysisCX - Merely on basis of statement given by one employee to police that raw materials worth Rs.2 crore were destroyed in fire, same cannot be taken as gospel truth: CESTATGovt keen to make agri schemes 'income-centric' rather than 'production-centric': MinisterKolkata DRI seizes 12.4 kg elephant tusk being smuggled from Assam to NepalDigital India successing becoz of people's pull: PMFish eats plastic & humans eat fish - serious health hazard: MinisterI-T - When assessee was only a licensee, not having exclusive rights over a property, vide unregistered document, it cannot claim to be owner of property for purpose of Sec 22: HCRailways relaxes upper age limit for Group C postsNo GST is leviable on goods sold/transferred while remaining in Customs bonded warehouseLeviability of IGST and as well as Compensation cess under Customs ActAG expresses concern over CBEC cases being dismissed by SC on ground of delayTime to shift focus from acronyms to gaps in performanceGST - Industry reports cumbersome procedures & high cost of compliance
Policy makers in debt-stressed nations should act on IMF's recipe

OCTOBER 20, 2016

By TIOL Edit Team

A slew of International Monetary Fund (IMF) documents on record global debt should rattle all policy makers including the ones who frame tax policies.

Released during October 2016, the documents give valuable insight into challenges in resolving debt problem. The Finance Ministry, Reserve Bank of India and banks should benefit from this in rolling out a framework for sustainable debt.

The reports and working papers (WPs) should also help them undertake cost-benefit analysis of corporate debt restructuring (CDR) and in preventing recurrence of unsustainable debt in future.

IMF deserves applaud for focusing on this mother of all major economic woes in its latest bi-annual 'Fiscal Monitor' report. It is aptly titled 'Debt-Use It Wisely'.

The report shows that global debt at USD 152 trillion is at an all-time high, aggregating to 225 percent of world GDP. Of this, two-thirds (or USD 100 trillion) is the debt of the private sector with the balance being public debt.

Private credit has grown sharply in certain emerging market economies (EMEs) such as China. The report cautions: "The speed of the increase dangerously resembles that in advanced economies in the run-up to the global financial crisis."

The report is packed with empirical evidence that affirm the premise that financial crises tend to be associated with excessive private debt levels in both advanced and EMEs. The resulting recession is acute and prolonged in countries with weak fiscal health.

The implications of analysis made in the report are eye-opener. As put by the Report, "Financial recessions in emerging market economies result in output losses that are almost double those in advanced economies after five years. These results underscore the importance of having the prudential and regulatory frameworks necessary to keep private debt in check as well as the value of prudent fiscal policy."

Pitching for growth-friendly fiscal policy, the Report has favoured targeted fiscal interventions to clean balance-sheets of both debtors and creditors. The interventions can be grouped into two categories - 1) Initiatives such as subsidies for creditors to lengthen maturities, guarantees, and direct lending to aid voluntary restructuring of private debt. 2) Steps such as capital infusion in banks and setting up of asset management companies that facilitate cleanup of banks' balance sheets.

The Report has preferred targeted subsidies, fund transfers and loans to tax incentives for cleaning up private balance sheets. It believes that tax incentives can be exploited by companies for tax avoidance and add complexity to a country's tax system.

Another IMF document captioned 'The Managing Director's Global Policy Agenda-Getting Growth Right', has disclosed that IMF staff will analyze how some tax systems magnify macroeconomic stability risks by favouring debt finance.

We hope Indian budget-makers would take this as a lead to study whether tax incentives have contributed to unsustainable debt in the corporate sector.

Similarly, they as well as bankers should draw lessons from IMF's WP captioned 'Benefits and Costs of Corporate Debt Restructuring: An Estimation for Korea'.

WP says: "Benchmark results for Korea suggest 5.5-7.5 percent of GDP creditor losses and a 0.4-0.9 percent of the labour force employment impact from the debt restructuring. These are compensated by a permanent 0.4-0.9 percentage points increase in future GDP growth thanks to higher corporate investment and 0.05-0.1 percent of labour force higher hiring in the subsequent years. The key qualitative result is that corporate debt restructurings 'pay off' in the medium term: their economic cost is recouped over about 10 years."

No global discourse on CDR is complete without taking a hard looking situation in China, which is one of the major drivers of global economic growth.

Another WP titled "Resolving China's Corporate Debt Problem' notes that corporate credit growth in China has been excessive in recent years. This credit boom is related to the large increase in investment after the global financial crisis. Investment efficiency has fallen and the financial performance of corporates has deteriorated steadily, affecting asset quality in financial institutions."

Pitching for urgent formulation of a comprehensive debt resolution problem, WP says: "Potential 'debt-at-risk' is estimated to be about 15½ percent of the total corporate loan portfolio as of end-2015, which could yield estimated potential losses of about 7 percent of GDP."

As regards public debt, it is worthwhile to draw attention to a WP titled 'The Blind Side of Public Debt Spikes'. It has concluded that debt spikes are not rare events and their probability increases with time. The Paper arrived at this finding after studying 179 debt spike episodes from 1945 to 2014 across advanced and developing countries.

It has concluded that large debt spikes are typically driven by large stock-flow adjustments (SFAs), rather than primary deficits or declines in output.

According to IMF, SFAs refers to change in the gross debt explained by factors other than the overall fiscal balance (for example, valuation changes). SFAs explain the difference between the change in government debt and the government deficit/surplus for a given period.

WP notes that SFAs are often linked to an accumulation of illiquid assets that are difficult to offload for reducing debt. The consequences of large SFAs can be long-lasting.

As put by the Paper, "Better forecasting will help countries get a proper understanding of their debt vulnerabilities and build fiscal buffers that could cushion them against unexpected shocks. This awareness will also help with instituting policies and measures necessary to meet their objectives for debt to GDP in the medium to long run."

The common message of IMF studies is that policy-makers have to be vigilant about gradual build-up of debt crisis and should prevent it through timely interventions.