News Update

India-Ghana Joint Trade Committee meeting held in AccraGhana agrees to activate UPI links in 6 monthsGST - Record does not reflect that any opportunity was given to petitioner to clarify its reply or furnish further documents/details - In such scenario, proper officer could not have formed an opinion - Matter remitted: HCED seizes about 20 kg gold from locker of a cyber scammer in HaryanaGST - Mapping of PAN number with GST number - No fault of petitioner - Respondent authorities directed to activate GST number within two weeks: HCGST - Circular 183/2022 - Petitioner to prove his case that he had received the supply and paid the tax to the supplier/dealer - Matter remitted: HCGST -Petitioner to produce all documents as required under summons -Petitioner to be heard by respondent and a decision to be taken, first on the preliminary issue raised with regard to applicability of CGST/SGST: HCGST - s.73 - Extension of time limit for issuance of order - Notifications 13/2022-CT and 09/2023-CT are not ultra vires s.168A of the Act, 2017: HCSun releases two solar storms - Earth has come in its wayRequisite Checks for Appeals - RespondentInheritance Tax row - A golden opportunity to end 32-years long Policy Paralysis on DTCThe Heat is on: Preserving Earth's Climate in the Face of Global WarmingVAT - Timeline for frefund must be followed mandatorily while recovering dues under Delhi VAT Act: SCIndia, Australia to work closely for collaborative projectsCX - All the information was available to department in 2003 itself, therefore, SCN issued four years after gathering information is not sustainable and is highly barred by limitation: HCPowerful voices of amazing women leaders resonated at UN Hqs75 International visitors from 23 countries arrive to watch world's largest elections unfoldCentre asks States to improve organ donation frequencyCus - Revenue involved in the appeal filed by Commissioner is far below the threshold monetary limit fixed by the CBEC, therefore, department cannot proceed with this appeal - Appeal stands disposed of: HCAdani Port to develop port in PhilippinesUS Nurse convicted of killing 17 patients - 700 yrs of jail-term awarded
 
Cus - Import of equipment - Department has no jurisdiction to question certificate issued by Sports Authority of India: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, SEPT 19, 2016: ALL India Tennis Association, New Delhi imported a consignment of Pulse Sprint Flat Bed Treadmill, Pulse Ascent Elevated Treadmill, Pursuit Cycle and Pace Stepper and claimed benefit of Notfn. No. 146/94-Cus. dt.13.07.1994; Notfn. No. 16/2000 dt.1.3.2000 Sr. No. 331 (Condition No. 76).

It was the contention of the department that these imported items do not fall under the exemption Entry No. 331 as these items are General Physical Exercise equipments used in gymnasium falling under CTH 9506.

On the objection of the department,the importers paid duty of Rs.3,53,419/- under protest and thereafter claimed refund of the same.

The adjudicating authority rejected the refund claim on the ground that the imported goods being general physical exercise equipment are not used in a National or International Championship or Competition to be held in India or abroad and hence the exemption claimed is not available.

Having failed before the Commissioner (Appeals), the appellant is before the CESTAT.

None appeared on behalf of the appellant.

The AR reiterated the stand taken by the department.

Notification No. 16/2000-Cus.exempts all goods of Chapter 94 which is required for games and sports, subject to compliance of condition No. 76 of the Notification that reads:

"If certified by the apex body in relation to the concerned game or sport (the highest organization, other than Government, by which the game or sport is controlled or regulated), that the requisites for games and sports are required to be used in a national or international championship or competition to be held in India or abroad."

The Bench, after noting the above, observed -

++ It is provided that the exemption is available on the condition that apex body certifies that the requisites for games and sports are required to be used in a national or international championship or competition to be held in India or abroad.

++ From the certificate (provided by appellant), it is clear that the Sports Authority of India has certified the specific imported goods that the said equipments are used for national or international tournaments.

++ As per the Condition 76 only certification from the apex body is required, so long that condition is complied with exemption is available to the imported goods. Moreover, for the purpose of national or international tournaments, the fitness of the player is the primary criteria for preparing to face the competition of national or international tournaments. Therefore, it cannot be said that these fitness equipments are not used by the appellant for national or international tournaments.

++ We are, therefore, of the considered view that on the basis of certificate dt. 14.6.2000 issued by Sport Authority of India addressed to the Assistant Commissioner of Customs, Bombay in respect of equipments imported by the appellant, exemption notification is clearly admissible to the appellant.

Holding that the department has no jurisdiction to question the certificate issued by Sports Authority of India, the impugned order was set aside and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief.

(See 2016-TIOL-2443-CESTAT-MUM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.