News Update

India received foreign remittance of USD 111 bn in 2022, says UNPitroda resigns as Chairman of Indian Overseas Congress over racist remarkGovt hosts workshop on improving Ease of Doing Business in Mining sectorI-T - Anything made taxable by rule-making authority u/s 17(2)(viii) should be 'perquisite' in form of 'fringe benefits or amenity': SCCus - Drawback - Revenue contends that appeal of exporter ought to have been dismissed by Tribunal as not maintainable since correct remedy was filing a revision application with Central government - Appeal disposed of: HCCus - CHA - AA has clearly brought out the modus adopted by the appellant and how he was a party to the entire under valuation exercise - Factual finding affirmed by Tribunal - No question of law arises for consideration: HCGST - Proper officer has not applied his mind while passing the order; confirmed demand by opining that reply is not satisfactory - Proper Officer is directed to withdraw all punitive actions taken against petitioner pursuant to impugned order: HCGST - Proper Officer had to at least consider the reply on merits and then form an opinion - Non-application of mind - Order set aside and matter remitted for re-adjudication: HCGST - Cancellation of registration for non-filing of returns - Suspension/revocation of license would be counterproductive and works against the interest of revenue - Pragmatic view needs to be taken to permit petitioner to carry on his business: HC86 flights of AI Express cancelled as crew goes on mass sick leaveTax Refund Conundrum - Odyssey of Legal MisstepsI-T- AO not barred from issuing more than one SCN; Fresh SCN seeking information is not without jurisdiction, more so where HC itself directed re-doing of assessment: HCMurthy launches Capacity Building on Design and Entrepreneurship programCash, liquor & drugs worth Rs 110 Cr seized from Jharkhand ahead of pollsI-T- Appeal before CIT(A) (NFAC) is rightly dismissed where it has been delayed by over one year without just & reasonable cause: ITATPoll-induced stress: 2 Bihar officials die of heart attack at polling boothsSixth Edition of Commandants' Conclave held in PuneSome Gujarat villages keep away from polls over unfulfilled demands from governmentRoof-hugging inflation nudges Argentina to print first lot of 10,000 notes of pesoInvestigation finds presence of ‘boys club’ strands of culture at American bank regulatorUS cancels licence to some firms found exporting materials to Huawei
 
Cus - Notfn. 12/2012-Cus has been issued in public interest- Therefore, it is not correct on part of Revenue to state that since purpose of import of aircraft is in nature of personal use and not for public use the benefit should be denied: AAR

By TIOL News Service

NEW DELHI, AUG 30, 2016: APPLICANT is a public limited company proposing to import aircraft for providing non-scheduled (charter) service - they intend to charter the aircraft imported to related companies, primarily for use by the related company's top executives, directors, investors, promoters and their family members/friends, as revenue flights.

They seek ruling from the Authority on -

Whether the benefit of the Notification No. 12/2012-Cus is available to NSOP (Non-Schedule Operator's Permit) holder for the following categories of revenue flights proposed to be undertaken -

a) Use by the permit holder's employees/directors/investors and their family/friends, not necessarily for business purposes.

b) Charter the aircraft to group companies for use by their employees/directors/investors and their family/friends, not necessarily for business purposes

c) Lease the aircraft to group companies for use by their employees/directors/investors and their family/friends, not necessarily for business purposes.

Revenue submits -that the intended purpose of this aircraft is in the nature of personal use and not for public use; that the aircraft is intended to be used for the personal use of their employees/directors/investors and their family/friends, not necessarily for business purposes - exemption notification (Sr. No. 453 of Notification No. 12/2012-Cus) does not cover these situations to be eligible to claim the benefit of the said notification - As the public interest is always a guiding factor in exemption and as the applicant does not fall within the scope of the notification, the application made for advance ruling may be rejected.

Ruling by Advance Rulings Authority:

+ Both the conditions in condition 77 annexed to Notification 12/2012-Cus[Sr. No. 453] make it clear that approval of competent authority is required for import of aircraft for providing non-scheduled (passenger) services or non-scheduled (charter) services and importer is required to furnish undertaking to the Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Customs at the time of import to the effect that the aircraft shall be used only for providing non-scheduled (passenger) services or non-scheduled (charter) services, as the case may be.

+ Both these conditions have to be read in conjunction with Explanation 2 to the notification, which clarifies that the use of such imported aircraft by a non-scheduled (passenger) operator for non-scheduled (charter) services or by a non-scheduled (charter) operator for non-scheduled (passenger) services, shall not be construed to be a violation of the conditions of import at concessional rate of duty. It is noticed from the application filed by the applicant that the applicant is proposing to import aircraft for providing non-scheduled (charter) services; therefore, applicant may use the aircraft imported for providing non-scheduled (passenger) services or non-scheduled (charter) services.

+ Paragraph 2.5 of CAR issued in pursuance of Rule 133A of the Aircraft Rules, 1937 is regarding operation and use of aircraft and same is part of Explanation I (c) to Notification No. 12/2012-Cus. Therefore, the contention of Revenue that provisions of CAR 2.5 and 2.6 cannot be invoked to avail concessions/facility/ provisions, are not correct. It also noticed that the subject notification as well as contents of CAR does not debar the use of said aircraft for other than business purposes. In the absence of any such restriction, aircraft can be used for other than business purposes.

+ Notification No. 12/2012-Cus has been issued by the Central Govt. in public interest. As discussed, benefit of exemption notification has been extended to operators subject to fulfillment of conditions mentioned therein. Therefore, it is not correct on the part of the Revenue to state that the applicant does not fall within the scope of the notification.

Ruling on the application:

The benefit of the Notification No. 12/2012-Cus is available to NSOP (Non Schedule Operator's Permit) holder for the following categories of revenue flights (with published tariff) proposed to be undertaken;

a) Use by the permit holder's employees/directors and their family, not necessarily for business purposes.

b) Charter the aircraft to group companies for use by their employees/directors and their family, not necessarily for business purposes

c) Lease the aircraft to group companies for use by their employees/directors and their family, not necessarily for business purposes.

The application was allowed.

(See 2016-TIOL-23-ARA-CUS)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.