News Update

World Energy Congress 2024: IREDA CMD highlights need for Innovative Financing SolutionsVoter turnout surpasses 50% by 4 PM in Phase 2 pollsST - Amendment made to FA, 1994 on 14.05.2015 making service tax applicable retrospectively on chit-fund business is only prospective - Refund payable of tax paid between 01.07.2012 to 13.05.2015: HCXI tells Blinken - China, US ought to be partners, not rivalsST - SVLDRS, 2019 - Amnesty Scheme, being of the nature of an exemption from the requirement to pay the actual tax due to the government, have to be considered strictly in favour of the revenue: HCCX - Issue involved is valuation of goods u/r 10A of CE Valuation Rules, 2000 - Appeal lies before Supreme Court: HCCus - Smuggling - A person carrying any article on his belonging would be presumed to be aware of the contents of the articles being carried by him: HCCus - Penalty that could be imposed for smuggling 3.2 kg of gold was Rs.88.40 lakhs, being the value of gold, but what is imposed is Rs.10 lakhs - Penalty not at all disproportionate: HCCus - Keeping in mind the balance of convenience and irreparable injury which may be caused to Revenue, importer to continue indemnity bond of 115 crore and possession of confiscated diamonds to remain with department: HCCus - OIA was passed in October 2022 remanding the matter to adjudicating authority but matter not yet disposed of - Six weeks' time granted to dispose proceedings: HCI-T - High Court need not intervene in matter involving factual issues; petitioner may utilise option of appeal: HCChina asks Blinken to select between cooperation or confrontationI-T - Unexplained cash credit - additions u/s 68 unsustainable where based on conjecture & surmise alone: ITATHonda to set up USD 11 bn EV plant in CanadaImran Khan banned from flaying State InstitutionsI-T - Income from sale of flats cannot be computed in assessee's hands, where legal possession of flats had not been handed over to buyers in that particular AY: ITATPro-Palestine demonstration spreads across US universities; 100 arrestedI-T - Investment activities in venture capital which are not covered in negative list under Schedule III to SEBI Regulations, qualifies for deduction u/s 10(23FB): ITATNATO asks China to stop backing Russia if keen to forge close ties with WestNY top court quashes conviction of Harvey Weinstein in rape case
 
CX - When the Ministry of Commerce treats Imported Paper Cone as packing material explicitly, CE department cannot treat same as 'raw material' - benefit of notfn. 8/97-CE is admissible to cotton yarn cleared into DTA: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, JUNE 30, 2016: THIS is a Revenue appeal filed in the year 2005 and the matter came up for hearing recently.

The issue involved is whether the respondent is eligible to avail the benefit of Notification 8/97-CE dated 1.3.1997 which inter alia grants exemption in the following manner -

…exempts the finished products, rejects and waste or scrap specified in the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 (5 of 1986) and produced or manufactured , in a hundred per cent export-oriented undertaking or a free trade zone wholly from the raw materials produced or manufactured in India , and allowed to be sold in India under and in accordance with the provisions of paragraphs 102 and 114 of the Export and Import Policy 1 April 1992 - 31 March 1997…

The facts are that the respondent is a 100% EOU manufacturing cotton yarn and used imported paper cones for winding of yarn. It is the case of the Revenue that the respondent having used imported paper cones for winding of yarn is ineligible for the benefit of exemption notification 8/97-CE on the ground that the imported paper cones are raw materials.

Whereas the Adjudicating authority held against the assessee, the Commissioner(A) reversed the decision and held that paper cones being packing materials , the benefits of notification 8/97-CE as claimed by the assessee are to be extended; accordingly allowed the appeal.

The AR spelt out the ground for denying the exemption as contained in the appeal.

The respondent assessee submitted that the Notification 8/97-CE only bars usage of "raw materials", however, paper cones are ‘packing materials' as evidenced by them.

The Bench observed that the Revenue has no case as -

++ Firstly, it is evidenced by the respondent that imported paper cones are packing materials by producing letter no. SEEPZ/Gov/187/96/02-03/305 dated 13.05.2003 that the paper cones are packing materials. When the Ministry of Commerce, another Ministry of Government of India, treats the paper cones as packing material explicitly, it cannot be said that they are "raw materials" as envisaged in notification 8/97.

++ Secondly, as correctly held by the first appellate authority, expression "raw materials" is a material used in manufacture of goods; in the case in hand wherein cotton yarn is manufactured paper cone cannot be held as "raw material" as it is undisputed that cotton yarn on completion of manufacture is wound on the paper cones.

++ Thirdly, the respondent as well as Ministry of the Government of India has understood that paper cones are packing materials, and were permitted to import the same as such without payment of duty.

++ Fourthly, the findings of the first appellate authority in paragraph 9 of the impugned order are not controverted by the Revenue effectively by any evidence.

The Revenue appeal was rejected.

(See 2016-TIOL-1578-CESTAT-MUM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.