News Update

Apple China tosses out WhatsApp & Threads from App store after being orderedChina announces launch of new military cyber corpsRailways operates record number of additional Trains in Summer Season 2024GST - Assessing officer took into account the evidence placed on record and drew conclusions - Bench is, therefore, of the view that petitioner should present a statutory appeal: HC1st phase polling - Close to 60% voter turnout recordedGST - Tax liability was imposed because petitioner replied without annexing documents - It is just and appropriate that an opportunity be provided to contest tax demand on merits, albeit by putting petitioner on terms: HCMinistry of Law to organise Conference on Criminal Justice System tomorrowGST - To effectively contest the demand and provide an opportunity to petitioner to place all relevant documents, matter remanded but by protecting revenue interest: HCGovt appoints New Directors for 6 IITsGST - Petitioner has failed to avail opportunities granted repeatedly - Court cannot entertain request for remand as there has been no procedural impropriety and infraction of any provision by assessing authority: HCNexus between Election Manifesto and Budget 2024 in July!GST - Classification - Matter which had stood examined by Principal Commissioner is being treated differently by Additional Commissioner - Prima facie , approach appears to be perverse: HCI-T- Denial of deduction u/s 80IC can create perception of genuine hardship, where claimant paid tax in excess of what was due; order denying deduction merits re-consideration: HCIsrael launches missile attack on IranEC holds Video-Conference with over 250 Observers of Phase 2 pollsGermany disfavours Brazil’s proposal to tax super-richI-T- If material found during search are not incriminating in nature AO can not made any addition u/s 153A in respect of unabated assessment: ITATGovt appoints Dinesh Tripathi as New Navy ChiefAFMS, IIT Kanpur to develop tech to address health problems of soldiersFBI sirens against Chinese hackers eyeing US infrastructureKenya’s top military commanders perish in copter crashCBIC notifies Customs exchange rates w.e.f. April 19, 2024Meta shares ‘Most Intelligent’ AI assistant built on Llama modelDengue cases soaring in US - Close to ‘Emergency situation’: UN Agency
 
Modified Taxation - PM Meets his Taxmen

DDT in Limca Book of Records - Third Time in a rowTIOL-DDT 2869
16 06 2016
Thursday

"WE need to look at the whole administrative system in the country, not just the IAS or the Revenue Service or any other service. We need to re-relate the system, each service in a particular manner according to our priorities. The priorities in hierarchy need not be priorities in emoluments and salaries. Certain technical areas will need to be looked at with special attention. We need to see that frustration does not develop in any service because they cannot rise above a particular point. This is a very big task."

That was Rajiv Gandhi addressing the All India Income Tax Commissioners Conference on 4th June 1987 - that was the last time around when a Prime Minister addressed the Taxmen's conference, but Rajiv Gandhi was also Finance Minister at that time and he addressed the conference in his capacity as the Finance Minister. So, Modi is not really the first Prime Minister to address the tax officers' conference.

Prime Minister Modi is meeting his Principal Commissioners (and above rank officers) today. The Prime Minister is scheduled to spend about 100 minutes with the senior taxmen. It is his private meeting with his officers and so Press Reporters are not allowed. After the PM leaves, the Finance Minister is to interact with the Press.

Notification 67/95-CE; Clearances to SEZ Eligible for Exemption - CBEC Sets right a long pending wrong

FROM TIOL-DDT 2697-05 10 2015

Notification No. 67/95-CE dated 16.03.1995 as amended provides exemption from payment of whole of the Central Excise duty on the specified inputs manufactured in a factory and captively consumed within the factory of production in or in relation to the manufacture of specified final products provided the final products are cleared on payment of duty. This means, duty is payable on the inputs/intermediate goods, which are captively consumed in the manufacture of final products, which are fully exempted from payment of duty or chargeable to 'Nil' rate of duty.

However, in the notification, exception is given to those goods, which are cleared:

(i) to a unit in Free Trade Zone, or

(ii) to a Hundred Percent Export Oriented Undertaking, or

(iii) to a unit in a Electronic Hardware Technology Park, or

(iv) to a unit in a Software Technology Park, or

(v) under Notification No. 108/95-CE dt. 28.08.1995, or

(vi) by the manufacturer of dutiable and exempted final products after discharging obligation prescribed in Rule 6 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004

The DG, Audit of the Department noticed that an assessee cleared certain quantities of Cement at "Nil" rate of duty to  SEZ units. The clearances to a unit in SEZ is not notified as exception under the Notification No. 67/95-CE dated 16.03.1995 and hence it appears that the assessees are liable to pay central excise duty on the intermediate goods viz., "Clinker" used in the manufacture of cement, cleared to SEZ units without payment of duty.

A simple application of mind by the officers in the field would have saved the time and money of both department and the assessee. It is strange to know that the officers holding highest position in the department are not aware that the clearances to SEZ are neither 'exempted' nor chargeable to 'Nil' rate, but are 'exports' allowed to be cleared without payment of duty. Such clearances to SEZ are even eligible for sanction of rebate on par with exports. The exemption under captive consumption notification is not available only in cases where final products are 'exempted' or 'chargeable to Nil rate' and clearances to SEZ do not fall under these categories.

The word FTZ  is being continued in the notification No. 67/95-CE as a vestige of the past horrors, as there are no FTZs functioning in the country after enactment of SEZ Act.

But, who can put these simple facts into the minds of adjudication officers, when they have decided not to apply mind at the time of issuance of demands. All these notices are routinely confirmed for fear of review.

We had suggested in 2012 that references to "free trade zone" have to be removed and 'Special Economic Zones' inserted in all statutes, but Board allows such confusion in the statute to continue and then allows the Commissioners to create havoc in the field. Can you imagine several Commissioners actually held that the exception in Notification 67/95 is applicable for the non-existing FTZ and not the existing SEZ? Where has reason fled? Gurudev Tagore did not visualize IRS officers when he wrote about the clear stream of reason.

Recently the Chennai Bench of the CESTAT emphatically held that the assessees are eligible for exemption under Notification 67/95-CE on clinker captively consumed for manufacture of cement cleared to SEZ units/developers without payment of duty.

This was one of the issues discussed in the Central Excise Tariff Conference organised by the CBEC on 28th and 29th October, 2015.

The Conference recommended to the Board that notification no 67/95-C.E. should be amended to avoid litigation on the issue.

And it took the Board eight months to implement this. Now they have amended notification no 67/95-C.E to substitute "Special Economic Zone" for "Free Trade Zone". Though we suggested this four years ago, we are gratified that it has finally happened - just before the meeting with the PM.

A similar amendment is also made in Notification No. 214/86-CE (the job work exemption notification)

Notification No 24/2016-Central Excise, Dated: June 14, 2016

Notification No 25/2016-Central Excise, Dated: June 14, 2016

Customs - Imports - Applicability of CE Exemption Notification for CVD

THE Madras High Court has recently delivered a landmark judgement which will have serious impact on the subject. The judgement virtually overrules the Supreme Court decision on the subject.

The High Court held:

(i) In cases where the exemption Notifications are absolute and they do not make the benefit available only upon the fulfillment of any condition, even the importer would be entitled to the benefit of exemption.

(ii) In cases where the Notifications for exemption stipulate only one condition namely that the inputs used in the manufacture of the exempted goods should have suffered a duty, then the benefit of the Notification will not be available to any of the importers, since he could have never paid any duty of excise on the inputs used in their manufacture by the foreign manufacturer. This proposition is based upon the premise that the object of such Notifications is only to grant exemption to those final products, on which, some duty has been paid (in India) at the stage of inputs. In other words, Notifications of this nature, are not merely conditional, but also restrictive in nature, as they confer benefit not upon all manufacturers of exempted goods, even if they are domestic manufacturers, but only upon those, who use inputs that had suffered duty.

(iii) In cases where the exemption Notification stipulates only one condition namely that no CENVAT credit ought to have been availed on the inputs, the benefit of the Notification will be available only to those, who satisfy two conditions namely that the inputs used by them suffered a duty and that they did not seek CENVAT credit. Since an importer can never satisfy the first condition, the second condition becomes inapplicable to him and he cannot be heard to contend that the inapplicability of the condition by itself would make him eligible for the grant of the benefit.

(iv) In cases where the exemption Notification stipulates two conditions, namely that the inputs should have suffered duty and that no CENVAT credit should have been availed, then the benefit of the Notification will be available only if both conditions are satisfied. An importer will never be able to satisfy both these conditions and hence, he cannot claim the benefit.

Please see Breaking News for more details

Customs -Merger of Accredited Client Programme (ACP) and Authorized Economic Operator (AEO) programme - Board issues Draft Guidelines

CBEC has decided to merge the two facilitation schemes namely Accredited Client Programme (ACP) and Authorized Economic Operator (AEO) into a combined three-tier AEO programme, and also enhance the scope of these programmes so as to provide further benefits to the entities who have demonstrated strong internal control system and willingness to comply with the laws administered by the Central Board of Excise and Customs. The prominent features of the new programme are:

i. Inclusion of Direct Port Delivery of imports to ensure just-in-time inventory management by manufacturers - clearance from wharf to warehouse

ii. Inclusion of Direct Port Entry for factory stuffed containers meant for export by manufacturers or star trading houses recognized by Commerce Ministry

iii. Special focus on small and medium scale entities - any entity handling 25 import or export documents annually can become part of this programme

iv. Provision of Deferred Payment of duties - delinking duty payment and Customs clearance

v. Extension of facilitation to exports in addition to imports

vi. Faster disbursal of drawback amount

vii. Fast tracking of refunds and adjudications

viii. Self-certified copies of FTA/PTA origin related or any other certificates required for clearance would be accepted

ix. Request based on-site inspection/examination

x. Paperless declarations with no supporting documents

xi. Recognition by Partner Government Agencies and other Stakeholders as part of this programme

xii. Mutual Recognition Agreements with other Customs Administrations.

Board has issued a draft Circular and has asked for suggestions

CBEC Draft Circular

Increase in Tariff Values of Gold within a day

IT was only yesterday that DDT reported the revised tariff value rates by Notification No. 86/2016-CUSTOMS (N.T.), dated 14th June 2016 and the Government revised the rates again yesterday.

Gold sees a small hike while Silver has a 31 dollar hike. All the oils except crude soyabean will now have reduced tariff values and so will brass scrap. There is a small hike in arecanuts while poppy seeds remain static.

Table 1
S. No. Chapter/ heading/ sub-heading/tariff item Description of goods Tariff value USD (Per Metric Tonne) as on 14.06.2016 Tariff value USD (Per Metric Tonne) from 15.06.2016
(1)
(2)
(3)
(5)
(6)
1 1511 10 00 Crude Palm Oil 715 710
2 1511 90 10 RBD Palm Oil 729 716
3 1511 90 90 Others - Palm Oil 722 713
4 1511 10 00 Crude Palmolein 746 724
5 1511 90 20 RBD Palmolein 749 727
6 1511 90 90 Others - Palmolein 748 726
7 1507 10 00 Crude Soyabean Oil 782 800
8 7404 00 22 Brass Scrap (all grades) 2970 2933
9 1207 91 00 Poppy seeds 2533 2533
Table 2
S. No. Chapter/ heading/ sub-heading/tariff item Description of goods Tariff value USD from 14.06.2016 Tariff value USD from 15.06.2016
1 71 or 98 Gold, in any form in respect of which the benefit of entries at serial number 321 and 323 of the Notification No. 12/2012-Customs dated 17.03.2012 is availed. 416 per 10 grams 418 per 10 grams
2 71 or 98 Silver, in any form in respect of which the benefit of entries at serial number 322 and 324 of the Notification No. 12/2012-Customs dated 17.03.2012 is availed. 531 per kilogram 562 per kilogram
Table 3
S. No. Chapter/ heading/ sub-heading/tariff item Description of goods Tariff value USD (Per Metric Tons) from 14.06.2016 Tariff value USD (Per Metric Tons) from 15.06.2016
1 080280 Arecanuts 2617 2630

Notification No. 86/2016-CUSTOMS (N.T.)., Dated: June 15, 2016

Until Tomorrow with more DDT

Have a nice day.

Mail your comments to vijaywrite@tiol.in


 RECENT DISCUSSION(S) POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
Sub: Unique Warehousing Code, as per Customs Circular No 19_2016 Dt 20th May 2016

Dear Sir,
Mandatory Unique Warehousing Code for Customs Warehouses from 20th June (Monday)is applicable for EOUs,

Will it be a show stopper

Posted by
 

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.




Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.