News Update

ST - Amendment made to FA, 1994 on 14.05.2015 making service tax applicable retrospectively on chit-fund business is only prospective - Refund payable of tax paid between 01.07.2012 to 13.05.2015: HCST - SVLDRS, 2019 - Amnesty Scheme, being of the nature of an exemption from the requirement to pay the actual tax due to the government, have to be considered strictly in favour of the revenue: HCCX - Issue involved is valuation of goods u/r 10A of CE Valuation Rules, 2000 - Appeal lies before Supreme Court: HCCus - Smuggling - A person carrying any article on his belonging would be presumed to be aware of the contents of the articles being carried by him: HCCus - Penalty that could be imposed for smuggling 3.2 kg of gold was Rs.88.40 lakhs, being the value of gold, but what is imposed is Rs.10 lakhs - Penalty not at all disproportionate: HCCus - Keeping in mind the balance of convenience and irreparable injury which may be caused to Revenue, importer to continue indemnity bond of 115 crore and possession of confiscated diamonds to remain with department: HCCus - OIA was passed in October 2022 remanding the matter to adjudicating authority but matter not yet disposed of - Six weeks' time granted to dispose proceedings: HCI-T - High Court need not intervene in matter involving factual issues; petitioner may utilise option of appeal: HCChina asks Blinken to select between cooperation or confrontationI-T - Unexplained cash credit - additions u/s 68 unsustainable where based on conjecture & surmise alone: ITATHonda to set up USD 11 bn EV plant in CanadaI-T - Re-assessment is invalid where based only on a suspicion that income escaped assessment & where not based on concrete reasons to believe for commencing such proceedings : ITATImran Khan banned from flaying State InstitutionsI-T - Income from sale of flats cannot be computed in assessee's hands, where legal possession of flats had not been handed over to buyers in that particular AY: ITATPro-Palestine demonstration spreads across US universities; 100 arrestedI-T - Investment activities in venture capital which are not covered in negative list under Schedule III to SEBI Regulations, qualifies for deduction u/s 10(23FB): ITATNATO asks China to stop backing Russia if keen to forge close ties with WestCus - When Department has not complied with time limit, the order issued for revocation of licence or order issued for continuation of suspension licence cannot sustain: CESTATNY top court quashes conviction of Harvey Weinstein in rape caseWeather prediction normal for phase 2 poll dayIndiGo orders 30 Airbus A350s for long haulsST - Appellant is an 'authorised medical practitioner' providing 'healthcare services' - services exempted in terms of clause 2(i) of notification 25/2012-ST: Commr(A)RBI to issue fresh guidelines for banks to freeze suspected bank accounts being used for cyber crimesREC avails SACE-Covered Green Loan for 60.5 Billion Japanese YenStudy finds Coca-Cola accounts for 11% of branded plastic pollution worldwideCus - 'Small Form-factor Pluggable Optical Transceivers' are classifiable under CTH 8517 7090 and not under CTH 8517 62 90 - entitled for benefit of duty concession under 57/2017-Cus: CESTATDoNER discusses Development of Tourism in North EastCX - Appellant is eligible for exemption under Notfn 12/2012-CE upon fulfilling all conditions stipulated therein, thus sufficiently establishing that goods dealt with by Appellants qualify for exemption: CESTAT
 
Customs - LCD Panels are classifiable under CTH 90138010 as claimed by importer, but not under 85299090 as claimed by revenue: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

CHENNAI, MAY 27, 2016: THE Appellant company is engaged in the manufacture of computer monitor and registered with the Central Excise Department for manufacturing computer monitor. The Appellant imports LCD (Liquid Crystal Devices) Panels and classified under Tariff item 90138010 of the Customs Tariff Act. The appellant also claimed the benefit of BCD exemption under Sl.no.29 of Notification no.24/2005-Cus. However, the assessing officer was of the view that the LCD Panels were more appropriately classifiable under Tariff item 85299090 and not under Tariff item 90138010. There was no revenue implication as the goods classifiable under CTH 85299090 were eligible for benefits of BCD exemption vide sl.no.18 of the same Notification no.24/2005-cus.

The appellant contended that goods which are classifiable under Customs Tariff Heading (CTH) 8529 9090 are eligible for exemption from BCD under Sl.No. 18 of Notification 24/2005; that the goods are correctly classifiable under CTH 9013 8010 as liquid crystal devices which are subject to Nil rate of basic customs duty; that for disputes regarding classification, resort must be made to the general interpretative rules (GIR), in sequential order.

After hearing both sides, the Tribunal held:

+ The issue is no more res integra and is covered by the decision passed by the Delhi Bench of the Tribunal vide Final Order Nos. 52760 to 52780/2015 dated 10.6.2015 - 2015-TIOL-2277-CESTAT-DEL, in the appellants own case wherein the issue involved was identical and as to whether the classification of Imported LCD under chapter heading 9013 8010 vis-a-vis 8529 9090.

+ Apart from the Tribunal ruling, HSN has described LCD and from the fact that the wordings contained in CTH 9013 8010 are different from other entries dealing with LCD Technology. Tariff Heading 9013 covers LCD not constituting Article provided for more specifically in other headings. Explanatory Notes to the Heading 9013 also provide similarly and the panel under dispute are not described more specifically in any other heading. Therefore, the specific mention of LCD in Tariff Item 9013 8010 is more specific. This view is fortified in view of the exclusion of the Heading 9013 which would apply only to Articles which are more specifically provided for in other headings in the form of specific entries. It is therefore held that the LCD panel in the condition in which it is imported, are more specifically covered under 9013.

(See 2016-TIOL-1260-CESTAT-MAD)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.