News Update

ICG seizes 86 kg narcotics worth Rs 600 croreChief of Defence Staff Gen Anil Chauhan concludes his official visit to France9 killed as two vehicles ram into each other in ChhattisgarhConsumer court orders Swiggy to compensate for failure to deliver Ice CreamRequisite Checks for Appeals - Court FeeI-T - Members of Settlement Commission appointed amongst persons of integrity & outstanding ability & having special knowledge in/experience of direct taxes; unfortunate that SETCOM's orders are challenged without establishing them to be contrary to law or lacking in jurisdiction: HCThe 'taxing' story of Malabar Parota, calories notwithstanding!I-T - Unless a case of bias, fraud or malice is alleged, then Department cannot assail SETCOM's order: HCCentre allows export of 99,150 MT onion to Bangladesh, UAE, Bhutan, Bahrain, Mauritius & LankaI-T- Re-assessment vide Faceless Assessment u/s 144 of I-T Act, is barred by Section 31 of IBC 2016, which is binding upon all creditors of corporate debtor: HCPension Portals of all Pension Disbursing Banks to be integratedI-T- Resolution Plan under IBC, once approved, nullifies any claims pertaining to a period prior to approval of said Plan: HC‘Flash Mob’ drive in London seeks support for PM ModiI-T - Once assessee has produced all supporting documents which includes profit & loss account, balance sheet and copy of ITR of creditors, then identity & creditworthiness is established: ITATTo deliver political message, Pak Sessions judge abducted and then released: KPKI-T - Assessee shall provide monthly figures to arrive at year-end average of deposits received from members, interest paid thereon & investments made in FDs from external funds, for calculating Sec 80P deduction: ITATMaersk to invest USD 600 mn in Nigerian seaport infraI-T - It shall not be necessary to issue authorization u/s 132 separately in name of each person where authorization has been issued mentioning thereon more than one person: ITATChile announces 3-day national mourning after three police officers killedI-T- Since facts have not yet been verified by AO, issue of CSR expenditure can be remanded back for reconsideration: ITATIndian Coast Guard intercepts Pakistani boat with 86 kg drugs worth Rs 600 CroreI-T - Failure to substantiate cash deposits by employer during festival will not automatically lead to additions u/s 68, in absence of any opportunity of hearing: ITATGold watch of richest Titanic pax auctioned for USD 1.46 millionGST - There is no material on record to show as to why the registration is sought to be cancelled retrospectively - Order cannot be sustained: HCIraq is latest to criminalise same-sex marriage with max 15 yrs of jail-termST - Court cannot examine the issue, which is only a question of fact and evidence and not of the law - Petition dismissed: HCGST - fake invoice - Patanjali served Rs 27 Cr demand notice
 
Cus - 'Act II Microwave Popcorn' - Appellant manufactures very same product in India and classifies same under 20081190 and discharges appropriate CE duty, which has been accepted by department, then there is no reason for not extending said classification under Customs Tariff for the imported goods: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, APRIL 26, 2016: THIS is an appeal filed by the importer in the year 2005.

The facts are that the appellant imported "Act II Microwave Popcorn" under bill of entry dated 25.08.2004 and claimed classification under Customs Tariff Heading No. 20058000. Lower authorities were of the view that this Heading may not be appropriate as the same is applicable only for sweet corn while the imported goods are a variety of Popcorn which would fall under CTH 2106 90 99 and held so.

The appellant is before the CESTAT and submits that the correct classification would be under 2008 and not 2005 although it was claimed thus before the lower authorities. It is further submitted that imported goods are ready to use Popcorn mixed with butter and needs to be only Micro waved and consumed directly. Moreover, identical issue had come before the US Customs ruling court and it was held that the goods are classifiable under Chapter Heading No. 2008.

The AR adverted to the HSN Explanatory note of Chapter 21 and submitted that the imported goods are correctly classifiable under Chapter Heading no. 2106 as food preparations not elsewhere specified or included.

The entries are –

2008 Fruits, nuts and other edible parts of plants, otherwise prepared or preserved whether or not containing added sugar or other sweetening matter or spirit, not elsewhere specified or included

2088 99 99 ---- Other Kg. 30%

2106 Food preparation not elsewhere specified or included

2106 90 99 ----- Other Kg. 150%

The Bench referred to the competing entries and observed –

"…It can be seen from above reproduced Chapter Heading Numbers that the revenue's claim of classification of the product under 2106 seems to be without any basis as the said Chapter Heading 2106 talks about food preparation is not elsewhere specified or included. To our mind the said entry of 2106 is a general residual entry which would cover the classification of the product if it cannot be classified anywhere else. We find that the imported goods are prepared or preserved or used for making of Popcorn. It cannot be disputed that the goods are edible part of the plant. In our view, if it has to be accepted as edible part of the plant, the correct classification would be under Chapter Heading No. 2008. We find that even the HSN Explanatory notes of Chapter 21 as well as the Customs Tariff in respect of Chapter Heading No. 21, talks primarily about the products which are generally preparation not else were specified or included the Chapter Heading No. 2106, in our view this would apply in respect of Namkeens or other items, which are not classifiable under any other Heading. We also find that evidence from records, that importer appellant is a manufacturer of very same product in India and classified the same on Central Excise Tariff under Heading No. 20081190 and discharging appropriate rate of duty, which has been accepted by the Central Excise department. If the Central Excise department who are accepting the classification of said product under 20.08 and also accepting the duty payment, of the same product, we do not find any reason not to extend the said classification under Customs Tariff to the imported goods…."

Holding that the imported goods are correctly classifiable under Chapter Heading No. 20081190, the impugned order was set aside and the appeal was allowed.

(See 2016-TIOL-985-CESTAT-MUM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.