News Update

India-Ghana Joint Trade Committee meeting held in AccraGhana agrees to activate UPI links in 6 monthsGST - Record does not reflect that any opportunity was given to petitioner to clarify its reply or furnish further documents/details - In such scenario, proper officer could not have formed an opinion - Matter remitted: HCED seizes about 20 kg gold from locker of a cyber scammer in HaryanaGST - Mapping of PAN number with GST number - No fault of petitioner - Respondent authorities directed to activate GST number within two weeks: HCGST - Circular 183/2022 - Petitioner to prove his case that he had received the supply and paid the tax to the supplier/dealer - Matter remitted: HCGST -Petitioner to produce all documents as required under summons -Petitioner to be heard by respondent and a decision to be taken, first on the preliminary issue raised with regard to applicability of CGST/SGST: HCGST - s.73 - Extension of time limit for issuance of order - Notifications 13/2022-CT and 09/2023-CT are not ultra vires s.168A of the Act, 2017: HCSun releases two solar storms - Earth has come in its wayRequisite Checks for Appeals - RespondentInheritance Tax row - A golden opportunity to end 32-years long Policy Paralysis on DTCThe Heat is on: Preserving Earth's Climate in the Face of Global WarmingVAT - Timeline for frefund must be followed mandatorily while recovering dues under Delhi VAT Act: SCIndia, Australia to work closely for collaborative projectsCX - All the information was available to department in 2003 itself, therefore, SCN issued four years after gathering information is not sustainable and is highly barred by limitation: HCPowerful voices of amazing women leaders resonated at UN Hqs75 International visitors from 23 countries arrive to watch world's largest elections unfoldCentre asks States to improve organ donation frequencyCus - Revenue involved in the appeal filed by Commissioner is far below the threshold monetary limit fixed by the CBEC, therefore, department cannot proceed with this appeal - Appeal stands disposed of: HCAdani Port to develop port in PhilippinesUS Nurse convicted of killing 17 patients - 700 yrs of jail-term awarded
 
I-T - Whether refundable security deposit is not akin to income and same cannot be taxed - YES: ITAT

By TIOL News Service

AHMEDABAD, APR 18, 2016: THE issue is - Whether refundable security deposit is aking to income and the same cannot be taxed. YES is the answer.

Facts of the case

The assessee is a Company having resorts and Hotels. It filed return for relevant AY. During assessment process, AO noted that assessee had received some refundable security deposit, which were to be repaid to its members after 25 years without interest. The AO while completing the assessment, held that 60% of the total security deposit be treated as income and added to the returned income of the assessee for the year under consideration. Aggrieved assessee filed an appeal before the CIT(A), who partly allowed the appeal holding that only 1/25th of the security deposit collected during the year would alone be liable for taxation during the relevant FY. Aggrieved assessee filed further appeal before the Tribunal. The Revenue filed cross appeal before Tribunal stating that whether the CIT(A) was right in holding that only 1/25th of the security deposit collected alone need to be treated as income for the relevant assessment year.

After hearing parties, Tribunal held that,

++ the Tribunal, under the identical facts and circumstances of the case, has held that the security deposit collected from its members which is refundable and does not partake the character of income. The relevant finding of the Tribunal contained in para-5 in assessee's own case passed for AY 2008-09 reads as follows:-

".......The Supreme Court in the case of Siddheshwar Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. has held that these deposits are akin to transaction of loan. They are clearly liable to be excluded from taxable income. Therefore, respectfully following the judgement of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Siddheshwar Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd., we are of the considered view that the security deposits as received by the assessee-club cannot be subjected to tax. Accordingly, we find no merit in this ground of the Revenue's appeal, same is rejected."

++ in view of the aforesaid decision of the Coordinate Bench, I hold that the refundable security deposit collected is not liable to be taxed income of the assessee. It is ordered accordingly. As a result, ground Nos.1 to 3 raised in the assessee's appeal are allowed;

++ this issue is also covered by the decision of the Coordinate Bench passed in ITA No.2337/Ahd/2011 (Revenue's appeal) and ITA No.2054/Ahd/2011 for AY 2008-09 (Assessee's own appeal), dated 30/11/2015, wherein the Tribunal has held that the refundable security deposit collected does not tantamount to income and the same cannot be taxed. In view of the finding of the Tribunal, I hold that the ground raised in Departmental appeal is to be dismissed.

(See 2016-TIOL-555-ITAT-AHM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.