News Update

Cus - When there is nothing on record to show that appellant had connived with other three persons to import AA batteries under the guise of declaring goods as Calcium Carbonate, penalty imposed on appellant are set aside: HCCongress fields Rahul Gandhi from Rae Bareli and Kishori Lal Sharma from AmethiCus - The penalty imposed on assessee was set aside by Tribunal against which revenue is in appeal is far below the threshold limit fixed under Notification issued by CBDT, thus on the ground of monetary policy, revenue cannot proceed with this appeal: HCGST -Since both the SCNs and orders pertain to same tax period raising identical demand by two different officers of same jurisdiction, proceedings on SCNs are clubbed and shall be re-adjudicated by one proper officer: HCFormer Jharkhand HC Chief Justice, Justice Sanjaya Kumar Mishra appointed as President of GST TribunalSale of building constructed on leasehold land - GST implicationI-T - If assessee is not charging VAT paid on purchase of goods & services to its P&L account i.e., not claiming it as expenditure, there is no requirement to treat refund of such VAT as income: ITATBengal Governor restricts entry of State FM and local police into Raj BhawanI-T - Interest received u/s 28 of Land Acquisition Act 1894 awarded by Court is capital receipt being integral part of enhanced compensation and is exempt u/s 10(37): ITATCops flatten camps of protesting students at Columbia UnivI-T - No additions are permitted on account of bogus purchases, if evidence submitted on purchase going into export and further details provided of sellers remaining uncontroverted: ITATTurkey stops all trades with Israel over GazaI-T- Provisions of Section 56(2)(vii)(a) cannot be invoked, where a necessary condition of the money received without consideration by assessee, has not been fulfilled: ITATGirl students advised by Pak college to keep away from political eventsI-T- As per settled position in law, cooperative housing society can claim deduction u/s 80P, if interest is earned on deposit of own funds in nationalised banks: ITATApple reports lower revenue despite good start of the yearI-T- Since difference in valuation is minor, considering specific exclusion provision benefit is granted to assessee : ITATHome-grown tech of thermal camera transferred to IndustryI-T - Presumption u/s 292C would apply only to person proceeded u/s 153A and not for assessee u/s 153C: ITATECI asks parties to cease registering voters for beneficiary-oriented schemes under guise of surveys
 
Cus - Capsule Endoscopy Diagnostic system is eligible for exemption under Notification No 21/2002 – Revenue's contention that word 'wireless' is not mentioned in Notification is not justified: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

CHENNAI, APR 15, 2016: THE respondents imported medical equipment declaring the goods as "M2A Capsule Endoscopy Given Diagnostic System (Wireless Endoscopy)" falling under Customs Tariff Heading 90189044 and CETH 901800 along with spares and accessories claiming the benefit of Customs Notification No.21/2002 under List 37 of S.No.363A of the Table vide Item No.82 and CE Notification No.6/2002 at Sl.No.267A. The adjudicating authority denied the benefit of the notification on the ground that the imported equipments M2A Capsule Endoscopy Given Diagnostic System (Wireless Endoscopy) is not covered under Item No.82 of the List. On appeal by the respondent, the Commissioner (Appeals) in her impugned order allowed the benefit of exemption notification. Aggrieved by this, Revenue filed appeal.

Revenue argued that the imported equipment is a Wireless Gastro Endoscopy functioning based on the capsule containing video camera which is tracked by wireless whereas the notification allows only for fibre optic.

After hearing both sides, the Tribunal held:

+ on perusal of the product catalogue, literature and the extracts of journals of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, it is seen that Video Capsule Endoscopy which is advanced Endoscopic System which provides visualization of gastrointestinal track by transmitting images wirelessly from a disposable capsule with data recorder which is worn by the patient in the form of belt which is again connected to computer system when compared to conventional fibre optic endoscopy which is connected to fibre optic cables.

+ the entry in the Notification covers both "Fibreoptic Flexible Oesophago Gastroscope" and also "Video Oesophago Gastroscope". The equipment which is imported by the respondent is fully automatic (wireless) used for gastro endoscopy from mouth to intestine. The description used in the entry is "Video Oesophago Gastroscope". Revenue's contention that the word "wireless" is not mentioned in the notification is not justified. What is allowed in the entry Sl.No.82 is "Video Oesophagus Gastroscope". As per the technical definition "Gastro Intestinal Video Endoscope", it is nothing but Gastroscope using Video technology. The present equipment is based on wireless capsule and which covers not only throat but also entire gastro intestinal tract. Therefore, the equipment in dispute is rightly covered under Sl.No.82 under the description "Video Oesophago Gastroscope" and there is no infirmity in the findings of the impugned order.

(See 2016-TIOL-896-CESTAT-MAD)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.