News Update

IGST Refund for July month - Rs 132 Cr sanctioned in 10 days out of Rs 753 Cr, says CBEC ChairpersonGST - Revenue Secretary favours overhauling of rate structureMumbai Customs clears pendency of over 1 lakh claims and disburses drawback payment of Rs 7500 CrorePM inaugurates RO-RO ferry service between Ghogha & Dahej in GujaratWorld Economic Forum says Indian economy is on ascendancySovereign Gold Bond - Issue price to be Rs 2971/- per gram for subscription period Oct 23-25RBI insists on bank accounts being linked to AadhaarNo proposal to change method of calculating ceiling prices of scheduled drugs: GovtGovt clarifies it fixes prices of only about 17% of total drugs being sold in marketSolicitor General Ranjit Kumar puts in his papersFormer President Pranab Mukherjee loses his 86-yr-old brother; to attend last rites at BolpurChidambaram raps EC for not announcing Gujarat election datesST - Errors in CESTAT order - Perplexing that instead of setting out paragraph from apex court order against assessee, Tribunal order in favour of assessee reproduced - non-application of mind: High CourtSuspension of Reverse Charge - Side EffectAnti-dumping duty on Soda Ash imported from China, Pakistan and Iran to continue till decision of Gujarat HC - Rescinding Notification to remain in suspensionImports and Exports to Democratic People’s Republic of Korea - Paragraph 2.17 of the FTP 2015-2020 updated to account for UNSC ResolutionsI-T - Rent received for permitting 'hoarding' inside vacant premises of a housing society, are equally eligible annual letting value, so as to claim Section 24 deduction: ITATST – Entire exercise is revenue neutral since service tax which was payable was available as a CENVAT Credit to the appellant themselves instantly after making the payment of service tax: CESTATCX - Soap noodles was sold by HLL to companies against form 'C' who manufactured branded soap - Rule 8 of CE Valuation Rules, 2000 can be resorted to only when transaction is not of sale: CESTATTaliban-sponsored suicide bombers kill 40 soldiers in Kandhar provinceGSTN makes available offline utility for GSTR-3BGST - 2.5% CGST rate notified for intra-State supply of food preparations in unit containers meant for free-distribution to weaker sections + notifies documents to be produced for deemed exports benefitsWhite House launches Signature Campaign to mobilise support for Trump-led tax reformGST - Is it going to be costly perestroika for BJP?Younger generations to face more inequality in old age than present retirees: OECDPower Exchange - Only 4% of about 3750 MU per day generation being tradedTIOL wishes All Netizens a very Happy DiwaliFrench Parliament passes controversial anti-terror law empowering authorities to shut places of worship and restrict freedom of movementGST - CBEC clarifies on movement of goods within State and from one to another on approval basis + also notifies officers empowered to accept or reject application for GST PractitionerLinking Aadhaar with UAN - EPFO launches service for speedy servicesPM interacts with 380 Directors & Dy Secretaries in Central Govt; advises them to break silos with innovative ways
 
Beneficial provisions related to job work in Budget 2016

MARCH 05, 2016

By Pratik Shah CA, Lucky Ahuja, CA & Anurag Hans, CA

AS a part of Government's ambitious initiative 'Ease of doing business in India', certain procedural reforms have been introduced for job-work process vide notification no. 13/2016-CE, with effect from 01 st day of April, 2016 which are as follows.

Extended Permission for goods sent out for job-work

As per the provisions of sub-rule 6 of rule 4 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, a manufacturer, desirous of sending inputs or partially processed inputs outside its factory for the purpose of job-work, is required to obtain permission from jurisdictional Deputy/Assistant Commissioner, which is valid for a financial year .

Now, validity of permission has been extended to three financial years with effect from April 01st, 2016 to done away with the hassles of frequent renewals.

Inclusion of 'Tools for CENVAT Credit, sent to job-worker  

A manufacturer, sending out jigs, fixtures, moulds and dies for the purpose of further manufacturing according to his specifications to another manufacturer; or a job worker, is allowed to take CENVAT credit as per clause (b) of sub-rule 5 of rule 4 of CENVAT credit Rules, 2004. However, no such credit was available for Tools.

With effect from April 01 st 2016, tools falling under Chapter 82 sent to another manufacturer/job-worker for the production of the goods would also be eligible for CENVAT Credit besides jigs, fixtures, moulds, and dies.

CENVAT Credit distribution by Input Service Distributor (ISD) to Job-worker

With effect from 01st April 2016, Input Service Distributor can distribute the input service credit to an outsourced manufacturing unit which is defined to mean either a job-worker or a manufacturer who manufactures goods for the Input Service Distributor under a contract and are required to pay duty on specified value as per Central Excise Act and rules made thereunder.

Earlier ISD could distribute credit of input services only to its manufacturing units or units providing output services. Rule 7 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 has been suitably substituted with the new rule to accommodate these changes.

With these procedural, yet important changes, Government's intention and thrust to bring the necessary reforms and provide the conducive environment for growth of business is quite visible. These little changes should certainly be seen as an attempt by the government to restore the faith and confidence of the business community.  

(The authors are from SKP Business Consulting LLP.)

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the sites)

 RECENT DISCUSSION(S) POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
Sub: Job work permission not reuired

The permission is required only in case where the finished goods manufactured on job work basis are to be cleared from factory of the job worker without bringing back to factory of the supplier. No permission is required to be obtained for sending inputs for processing and return. Please correct the article which is misleading.

Posted by suresh hanamshet