News Update

I-T- Exercise of jurisdiction u/s 263 is invalid if AO has taken particular view, which though, may not be only view, but certainly can be possible view : ITATTorrential rains cause havoc in Pakistan; 87 killedI-T- Additions framed on account of unexplained money upheld as assessee was unable to prove source of cash deposited in assessee's bank account : ITATUS imposes sanctions on 3 Chinese firms and one from Belarus for transfering missile tech to PakistanCX - Appellant has regularly filed statutory returns on monthly basis and the fact of clearance of goods and availment of credit was duly reflected in returns but same has not been examined by authorities below, impugned order is not sustainable: CESTATDubai terribly water-logged as it has no storm drainsST - When services are received from separate source & accounted separately in separate ledgers, there cannot be any question of clubbing them under one category: CESTATEU online content rules tightened against adult content firmsCus - The continuous suspension of license of Customs Broker without either conducting an inquiry or issuing a notice for revocation of license or imposition of penalty is bad in law and needs to be set aside: CESTATEV market cools off in US; Ford, GM eyeing gas-powered trucksApple China tosses out WhatsApp & Threads from App store after being orderedChina announces launch of new military cyber corpsRailways operates record number of additional Trains in Summer Season 2024GST - Assessing officer took into account the evidence placed on record and drew conclusions - Bench is, therefore, of the view that petitioner should present a statutory appeal: HC1st phase polling - Close to 60% voter turnout recordedMinistry of Law to organise Conference on Criminal Justice System tomorrowGST - To effectively contest the demand and provide an opportunity to petitioner to place all relevant documents, matter remanded but by protecting revenue interest: HCGovt appoints New Directors for 6 IITsNexus between Election Manifesto and Budget 2024 in July!GST - Classification - Matter which had stood examined by Principal Commissioner is being treated differently by Additional Commissioner - Prima facie , approach appears to be perverse: HCIsrael launches missile attack on IranEC holds Video-Conference with over 250 Observers of Phase 2 polls
 
Competition Act - Whether exclusive arrangement between Govt and Air India with respect to all air travelling purposes under LTC scheme amounts to anti-competitive practices - NO: CCI

BY TIOL News Service

NEW DELHI, FEB 04, 2016: THE issue is: Whether the exclusive arrangement between Government of India and Air India with respect to all air travelling purposes under the Leave Travel Concession scheme amounts to anti-competitive practices. NO is the answer.

Facts of the case

The informant is an Individual. He was a consultant with different ministries to the Government of India. He filed complaint against Air India (OP 1), the Union of India and other airlines u/s 19(1)(a) of Act. The allegation was that Indian Government, through its policy directives/ office orders, force Government servants to avail the air travel services offered by Air India at a price which was much higher than those offered by its competitors in the market. The Government through its policy initiatives, ensure that OP 1 enjoys the benefits of having a captive customer base comprising of the government employees together with their dependants who undertake air travel under Leave Travel Concession ('LTC') Scheme, the government employees on official tour, and the private individuals traveling on government invitation. According to the Informant, support of the Union of India in the aforesaid manner had placed OP 1 in a dominant position, who engage itself in an unfair and discriminatory practice by charging a higher price for the tickets booked under LTC Scheme. The Informant further alleged that despite being conscious of the above said anti-competitive practices, other airlines remained silent because of the fear of a regulatory backlash from Union of India. It was alleged that compelling the government employees to avail the air travel services provided by OP 1 had been violation of the fundamental rights guaranteed under the Constitution of India.

Reasoning

Similar allegations had been examined by the Commission in the case of Travel Agents Association of India v. Balmer Lawries & Co. Ltd. & Anr., wherein the Commission held that the Government of India was the consumer of air ticketing services and a consumer is free to make a choice as far as selection of goods or services are concerned. Moreover, Ministries of Government of India are not an enterprise under the provisions of section 2(h) of the Act. Going by the same logic, the Commission in the present case held that Government of India is the consumer of air travel services as the tickets purchased under the LTC Scheme are funded by it. As a consumer of air travel services, it enjoys the liberty to exercise its choice even if such exercise of choice causes a favourable treatment for some Airline over the others.

Editor's Note: The reasoning of the Commission appears to be not very convincing and moreover with this order, there is one more addition after the IRCTC order to the list of orders when the Commission has ruled in favour of the Govt. The present practice of exclusive arrangement between Air India and the Govt of India under the Leave Travel Concession scheme certainly gives no option whatsoever to the Govt employees to choose any other airlines for their travel purposes.

(See 2016-TIOL-04-CCI-CACT)

 


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.




Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.