News Update

Maneka Gandhi declares assets worth Rs 97 Cr and files nomination papers from SultanpurGlobal Debt & Fiscal Silhouette rising! Do Elections contribute to fiscal slippages?ISRO study reveals possibility of water ice in polar cratersGST - Statutory requirement to carry the necessary documents should not be made redundant - Mistake committed by appellant is not extending e-way bill after the expiry, despite such liberty being granted under the Rules attracts penalty: HCBiden says migration has been good for US economyGST - Tax paid under wrong head of IGST instead of CGST/SGST - 'Relevant Date' for refund would be the date when tax is paid under the correct head: HCUS says NO to Rafah operation unless humanitarian plan is in place + Colombia snaps off ties with IsraelGST - Petitioner was given no opportunity to object to retrospective cancellation of registration - Order is also bereft of any details: HCMay Day protests in Paris & Istanbul; hundreds arrestedGST - Proper officer should have at least considered the reply on merits before forming an opinion - Ex facie, proper officer has not applied his mind: HCSaudi fitness instructor jailed for social media post - Amnesty International seeks releaseGST - A Rs.17.90 crores demand confirmed on Kendriya Bhandar by observing that reply is insufficient - Non-application of mind is clearly written all over the order: HCDelhi HC orders DGCA to deregister GO First’s aircraftGST - Neither the SCN nor the order spell the reasons for retrospective cancellation of registration, therefore, they are set aside: HCIndia successfully tests SMART anti-submarine missile-assisted torpedo systemST - Appellant was performing statutory functions as mandated by EPF & MP Act, and the Constitution of India, as per Board's Circular 96/7/2007-ST , services provided under Statutory obligations are not taxable: CESTATKiller heatwave kills hundreds of thousands of fish in Southern VietnamI-T - Scrutiny assessment order cannot be assailed where assessee confuses it with order passed pursuant to invocation of revisionary power u/s 263: HCHong Kong struck by close to 1000 lightningI-T - Assessment order invalidated where passed in rushed manner to avoid being hit by impending end of limitation period: HCColumbia Univ campus turns into ‘American Gaza’ - Pro-Palestinian students & counter-protesters clashI-T - Additions framed on account of bogus purchases merits being restricted to profit element embedded therein, where AO has not doubted sales made out of such purchases: HCIndia to host prestigious 46th Antarctic Treaty Consultative MeetingI-T - Miscellaneous Application before ITAT delayed by 1279 days without any just causes or bona fide; no relief for assessee: HCAdani Port & SEZ secures AAA RatingI-T - Assessee is eligible for deduction u/s 54EC on account of investment made in REC Bonds, provided both investments were made within period of six months as prescribed u/s 54EC: ITATNominations for Padma Awards 2025 beginsI-T - PCIT cannot invoke revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263 when there is no case of lack of enquiry or adequate enquiry on part of AO: ITATMissile-Assisted Release of Torpedo system successfully flight-tested by DRDOI-T - If purchases & corresponding sales were duly matched, it cannot be said that same were made out of disclosed sources of income: ITATViksit Bharat @2047: Taxes form the BedrockI-T - Reopening of assessment is invalid as while recording reasons for reopening of assessment, AO has not thoroughly examined materials available in his own record : ITAT
 
I-T - Whether provisions of Sec 14A cannot be invoked, when investments made were in sister concerns, or after such investments those companies became sister concerns - YES: ITAT

By TIOL News Service

 

CHENNAI, JAN 08, 2016: THE issue is - Whether provisions of Sec 14A cannot be invoked, when investments made were in sister concerns, or after such investments those companies became sister concerns. YES is the answer.

Facts of the case

The assessee is engaged in the business of providing logistics services and supply chain management. It had declared loss. During assessment, the AO held that given the volume and portfolio of investment, the assessee should have incurred expenditure in the form of managerial, administrative and monitoring nature. Therefore, made a disallowance u/s 14A relying on the CBDT circular No. 5 of 2014 dated 11- 02-2014 which had clarified that even when there was no exempt income earned during the year, section 14A can be invoked. On appeal, the DRP confirmed the same and held that as there was an increase in investment of more than 38 crores which clearly indicates that there was a direct nexus in increase in investment and borrowed capital and interest on borrowed capital charges to P&L A/c.

The Tribunal held that,

++ the main contention of the assessee is that the investments were made for acquiring control of other companies which are in the similar business of the assessee and all those companies subsequent to acquisition of the shares has become the sister concerns of the assessee. Moreover, the investments made were out of non-interest bearing funds of the assessee company. We find that these facts were not taken into consideration by the Revenue before invoking the provisions of Section.14A in the case of the assessee;

++ since the Revenue has not examined these facts, in the interest of justice, we hereby remit back the matter to the file of AO, in order to verify whether the investments made by the assessee company were in its sister concerns, or after such investments those companies have become the sister concerns of the assessee company by virtue of such investments, and further such investments were made from the non-interest bearing fund of the assessee company, and if found so, grant relief to the assessee in the light of the decision of the Chennai Bench of the Tribunal mentioned herein above.

(See 2016-TIOL-49-ITAT-MAD)


POST YOUR COMMENTS