News Update

Air India, Nippon Airways join hands for travel between India and Japan10 killed as two Malaysian Military copters crashGST - s.107(11) - There is no fetter on the powers of the appellate authority to modify the order passed u/s 130(2) by the adjudicating authority: HCSC grills Baba Ramdev & Balkrishna in misleading ad caseCBDT amends jurisdiction of Pr CCITs in many citiesGST - Statutory mandate of sub-section (4) of Section 75 is that a personal hearing should be provided either, if requested for, or if an order adverse to the taxpayer is proposed to be issued: HCCCI invites proposal for launching Market Study on AI and CompetitionGST - Documents with regard to service of notice could not be located; that impugned orders came be to be passed without an opportunity being granted to Petitioner to submit documents and being heard - Matter remanded: HCIndia initiates anti-dumping duty probe against import of Telescopic Channel drawer slider from ChinaAFMS, Delhi IIT ink MoU for collaborative research & trainingCX - The activity of waste water treatment is part of manufacturing activity and any activity which is directly or indirectly in relation to manufacture would be eligible for credit: CESTATDoP&T notifies fixation of Himachal IPS cadre strength and amendment in pay rulesIndia, Cambodia ink MoU for HRD in Civil ServiceBengaluru Airport Customs seizes 10 yellow anacondas from check-in baggageST - Appellant has collected some service tax from service recipient, which has been deposited with Department, same shall not be refunded to appellant: CESTATDelhi daily air traffic goes beyond 4.7 lakh paxGovt organizing National Colloquium on Grassroots Governance2 Telangana students killed in road accident in USI-T- Addl. Commr. or above ranking officer to probe how I-T portal reflected demand being raised against assessee, despite Revenue not having issued any notice or passed any order against assessee: HCAnother tremor of 6.3 magnitude visits Taiwan; shakes tall buildingsI-T- Donations given out of accumulated funds u/s 11(2) are not allowable as application of income for charitable or religious purposes and the same shall be deemed to be income of assessee : ITATYou are arrogant Mr Musk, says Australian PM over Sydney stabbing video banUnited Health reports theft of huge Americans’ dataI-T - Travelling conveyance expenses should be disallowed to extent of bills which were not verifiable and have no nexus with business of assessee: ITATEarth Day: Biden announces USD 7 bn grant for rooftop solar panelsOECD to release annual report on Tax Inspectors without Borders on April 29EU introduces easy Schengen Visa rules for IndiansI-T- Leasehold rights in land are not within purview of section 50C of Act : ITAT
 
Export of Bulk Cargo - CBEC complicates Procedure

DDT in Limca Book of Records - Third Time in a row

TIOL-DDT 2716
02 11 2015
Monday

GOODS can be cleared without payment of excise duty for export. The export can be under supervision and sealing of the packages or containers by the Central Excise officers and can also be under self sealing. The advantage of getting the containers sealed by the Central Excise Officers is that they are not normally further examined by the Customs at the port. It is easier and less expensive to deal with Central Excise officers than Customs officers.

It seems CBEC has received references from the trade as well as from field formations regarding problems faced by trade in sealing of Bulk Cargo for export under bond under Notification No.  42/2001-Central Excise  (N.T.), dated 26.06.2001. It has been pointed out that bulk cargo for e.g. coal, iron-ore, alumina Concentrate, heavy machinery etc. are difficult to seal in packages or container and hence a suggestion has been made that there is a need to prescribe procedure for export of such goods.

And so Board has prescribed a complicated procedure.

The Notification No. 42/2001-CE(NT) has been amended to stipulate that where the nature of goods is such that the goods cannot be sealed in a package or a container such as coal or ore, etc., exemption from sealing of package or container may be granted by the Principal Chief Commissioner or Chief Commissioner of Central Excise subject to safeguard as may be specified by him in the permission.

If you want to export without sealing this is how it happens.

1. Apply to the Principal Chief Commissioner/Chief Commissioner with a copy to Deputy Commissioner/Assistant Commissioner. And explain to them why the goods can't be sealed.

2. The Deputy Commissioner/Assistant Commissioner has 15 days to forward the application to the PC/Commissioner. He is supposed to send the application with due verification as needed. But Board doesn't say what is DUE and what is NEEDED.

3. The PC/Commissioner has three weeks to forward the application to the Principal Chief Commissioner/Chief Commissioner.

4. The Principal Chief Commissioner/Chief Commissioner will grant or reject the request for waiver of sealing of bulk cargo with in fifteen days of receipt of the application from the Principal Commissioner/Commissioner of Central Excise.

So, it may take you 51 days to know whether the permission has been granted or not and nobody will be responsible even if you don't get the communication from the Principal Chief Commissioner even after 50 days.

Export is supposed to be a National Priority and here is CBEC prescribing such a complicated procedure for granting exemption from sealing and giving its officers nearly two months time to grant or reject permission. And is the Chief Commissioner's order appealable or should you go to the High Court? What is the great achievement for CBEC in insisting on sealing unsealable goods? Why should the exporter be forced to seal the packages/containers?

It is really ridiculous to even imagine that the department wants 50 days to grant or reject permission. Is the exporter expected to wait for all these days for the great Indian bureaucracy to crawl through its administration? Will the foreign buyer move with the same snail's pace as the Indian Customs? Or will CBEC direct them also to wait for at least three months before something can be shipped from India?

If export is a priority, if facilitation is an avowed policy of the department and if ‘ease of doing business' is not an empty promise, why should the Board complicate matters? This Notification No.42/2001-CENT was issued more than 14 years ago - there was bulk cargo even then. Why should the Board suddenly wake up to create difficulties? When the whole thrust is on elimination of contact points, what is the need to create three contact points; now the exporter is required to follow up his request with the Assistant Commissioner's office, the Commissioner's office and the Chief Commissioner's office and papers don't move by themselves. In each of these offices, he will have to deal with an Inspector, a Superintendent and an Assistant Commissioner.

Export is a national priority - if permission of the Chief Commissioner is required, somebody from the Chief Commissioner's office should go and hand over the permission to the exporter within an hour of the application and ask him, “is there anything else the Chief Commissioner can do for you in facilitating this export?”. Will this ever happen in India?

And at the cost of repetition, why this sealing, why this exemption and why this permission? Whose interests are we trying to protect?

And in case it is absolutely required, why can't the Board identify some of the cargo and give a blanket permission without each exporter having to apply for it?

Notification No. 23/2015-Central Excise (N.T.), Dated: October 30, 2015 and CBEC Circular No. 1011/18/2015-CX, Dated: October 30, 2015

But what about balance of credit? Will CBEC act?

AND why can't the Board give clarification on the balance of education cess lying with the assessee on 1st March 2015 and 1st June 2015? That is really agitating the minds of concerned assessees. This should be an urgent problem for the Board to address.

Can Sardarji Jokes be Banned - SC to Hear

WHO creates Sardarji jokes - the Sardarji themselves:

There was a case in the Supreme Court on Friday - a writ petition to ban websites spreading jokes on sardars/Sikhs.

One of the judges said, "Sikh community is known for their sense of humour and they themselves might object to this petition." The other judge remarked that the Supreme Court was fortunate to have a Sikh judge and suggested that the petition be sent to him, to which the petitioner did not agree. The Judge asked Senior Counsel Abhishek Singhvi (who was in the court) for his opinion. Singhvi said, "Poland would be poor without Polish jokes and India would be poor without Sikh jokes".

Anti Dumping Duty on Float Glass - Provisional assessment

GOVERNMENT had imposed anti dumping duty on import of Clear Float Glass of nominal thickness ranging from 4 mm to 12 mm originating in or exported from Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and UAE by Notification No. 48/2014-Cus(ADD) dated 11.12.2014.

Tariq Glass Industries Limited, Pakistan (exporter) have requested for review in respect of exports of the goods made by them, and the designated authority has recommended provisional assessment of all exports of the goods made by the above party till the completion of the review by it.

So, the Government has ordered that pending the outcome of the said review by the designated authority, the subject goods, when originating in or exported from subject countries through the said exporter namely, M/s Tariq Glass Industries Limited, Pakistan and imported into India, shall be subjected to provisional assessment till the review is completed.

Notification No. 53/2015-Customs (ADD), Dated: October 30, 2015

When ITAT Doubts High Court Decision

IN a recent decision, the ITAT doubted the decision of the High Court on an issue before it. It was actually not a doubt, but a clear opinion different from that of the High Court.

What does the Tribunal do? ITAT held that it is bound by the decision of the High Court and decided the matter accordingly. The Tribunal observed, "the foregoing discussion which represents our humble opinion in the matter, is only to project the view point of Revenue, for consideration of the Hon'ble Court in appropriate proceedings."

This is judicial discipline - maybe the revenue officers should learn.

Hero Munjal is no more

IT was a childhood dream for many of us to have a Hero Bicycle - the Hero behind the Hero Honda success story Brijmohan Lal Munjal died yesterday at the age of 92. He started life selling spare parts of bicycles and went on to build the giant Hero empire.

A real hero indeed.

Macau Customs Chief kills herself

MACAU'S first Woman Customs Chief Lai Man Wa is reported to have committed suicide. She had slash wounds on both her wrists, swallowed sleeping pills and had a plastic bag wrapped over head.

Tariff Value of Gold, Silver Reduced

GOVERNMENT has decreased the Tariff value of gold and silver, and increased those of all other products including Brass Scrap but excluding areca nuts.

The Tariff values as on 15.10.2015 and with effect from 30.10.2015 are as under:

Table 1
S. No.
Chapter/ heading/ sub-heading/tariff item
Description of goods
Tariff value USD (Per Metric Tonne) from 15.10.2015
Tariff value USD (Per Metric Tonne) from 30.10.2015
(1)
(2)
(3)
(5)
(6)
1 1511 10 00 Crude Palm Oil 573 575
2 1511 90 10 RBD Palm Oil 612 617
3 1511 90 90 Others - Palm Oil 593 596
4 1511 10 00 Crude Palmolein 625 631
5 1511 90 20 RBDPalmolein 628 634
6 1511 90 90 Others - Palmolein 627 633
7 1507 10 00 Crude Soyabean Oil 705 754
8 7404 00 22 Brass Scrap (all grades) 3072 3117
9 1207 91 00 Poppy seeds 2648 2648
Table 2
S. No.
Chapter/ heading/ sub-heading/tariff item
Description of goods
Tariff value USD from 15.10.2015
Tariff value USD from 30.10.2015
1 71 or 98 Gold, in any form in respect of which the benefit of entries at serial number 321 and 323 of the Notification No. 12/2012-Customs dated 17.03.2012 is availed. 382 per 10 grams 373 per 10 grams
2 71 or 98 Silver, in any form in respect of which the benefit of entries at serial number 322 and 324 of the Notification No. 12/2012-Customs dated 17.03.2012 is availed. 518 per kilogram 517 per kilogram
Table 3
S. No.
Chapter/ heading/ sub-heading/tariff item
Description of goods
Tariff value USD (Per Metric Tons) from 15.10.2015
Tariff value USD (Per Metric Tons) from 30.10.2015
1 080280 Areca nuts 2662 2662

Notification No. 102/2015-Customs (NT), Dated: October 30, 2015

Until Tomorrow with more DDT

Have a nice day.

Mail your comments to vijaywrite@tiol.in


 RECENT DISCUSSION(S) POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
Sub: Export of bulk cargo

CBEC has proved once again that how egregious a notification can be. The time frame fixed for a decision is better suited to megalithic stone age and not for 21 st century. Are we traveling backward. This is yet another example of indifference to the need of easing procedures . This is high time Government to give training to the Officials on transparency accountability and the importance of time in business. In fact the need was to dispense with sealing in the case of bulk cargo and punitive measures for wrong doing

Posted by harinarayanan thekkekalathil
 

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.




Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.